Unimaginative Middle East Policy

Published in die Presse
(Austria) on 3 November 2011
by Wieland Schneider (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by June Polewko  .
In order to get the peace process moving again, U.S. leadership is much needed.


No one expected anything otherwise: Palestine's acceptance as a member of UNESCO — before it had even become a state — had hardly happened before Israel fired back. Prime Minister Netanyahu ordered the pace of settlement building in East Jerusalem and the West Bank to be accelerated. The motto there seems to be if you make trouble for me, you'll get it right back. Obviously not a strategy designed to solve Middle East problems.

Settlement expansion fits right into the strategy Netanyahu has long been pursuing despite international criticism. The only difference is that he now intends to pursue that strategy even more rigorously. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas handed him the pretext to do so.

By getting Palestine accepted as a full member of UNESCO, Abbas put pressure on Israel but didn't get any closer to his main goal of gaining statehood for Palestine. That can come about only at the negotiating table, but it now seems less likely that Palestinians and Israelis will ever assemble around that table.

Forcing both sides back into negotiations will require more leadership from the United States, but there is not a single trace of that leadership at present. What happened with UNESCO should be a wake-up call. A road map for negotiations has to be quickly put together. It is in the best interests of the Palestinians who want and deserve their own country; it's also in Israel's best interests in order to halt its rapid slide into global isolation.



Fantasielose Nahostpolitik
Von WIELAND SCHNEIDER

Um Friedensgespräche wieder in Gang zu setzen, bräuchte es mehr Leadership der USA.



Es war nicht anders zu erwarten: Kaum hatten die Palästinenser die Aufnahme ihres – noch nicht existierenden – Staates in die Unesco durchgesetzt, schoss Israels Regierung zurück. Premier Netanjahu gab die Order, den Ausbau der Siedlungen in Ostjerusalem und im Westjordanland zu beschleunigen. Nach dem Motto: Du machst mir Schwierigkeiten, also wische ich dir eines aus. Zur Lösung des Nahost-Problems trägt das freilich gar nichts bei.

Der Siedlungsausbau passt genau in Netanjahus Strategie, an der er schon bisher trotz internationaler Kritik festhielt. Nur dass er nun meint, diese Strategie noch härter umsetzen zu können. Palästinenserpräsident Abbas lieferte ihm den Vorwand dafür.

Mit Palästinas Aufnahme in die Unesco hat Abbas internationale Aufmerksamkeit zurückgewonnen und Israel unter Druck gesetzt. Dem großen Ziel eines von allen anerkannten Palästinenserstaates ist er aber nicht merklich nähergekommen. Das ist nur am Verhandlungstisch zu erreichen, doch derzeit sieht es nicht so aus, als würden Israelis und Palästinenser in nächster Zeit dort wieder Platz nehmen.

Um beide Seiten zu ernsthaften Gesprächen zu zwingen, bräuchte es mehr Leadership der USA. Aber davon ist derzeit keine Spur. Was in der Unesco geschah, sollte als Weckruf dienen. Die Weichen Richtung Verhandlungen müssen rasch gestellt werden. Im Interesse der Palästinenser, die ihren Staat wollen und verdienen. Und im Interesse Israels, das immer mehr in die Isolation zu rutschen droht.

("Die Presse", Print-Ausgabe, 03.11.2011)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Ireland: Real Legacy of Elvis May Be Contested, but His Story Recalls a Better America

Australia: Oil Markets Can’t Bank on Deal-Maker Donald Trump in the Middle East

Australia: Defying Donald Trump and Stepping out of the Shadows, Mojtaba Khamenei Ascends

Mexico: The Empire Gone Mad

Topics

South Korea: Strike on Elementary School Kills 175, Trump Blames Iran without Evidence

Mexico: The Empire Gone Mad

Egypt: When Americans Finally See What We Always Knew

Saudi Arabia: US Attempting To Pass the Buck to its Gulf Allies

Ghana: Ghana Must Choose Diplomacy over Alignment in the Israel-Iran Crisis

Saudi Arabia: Paradoxes of the Holy War

Australia: Iran, Not the US, Currently Has the Strategic Upper Hand

Australia: How Donald Trump and JD Vance Are ‘Philosophically a Little Bit Different’ on Iran

Related Articles

Austria: The Tariff Ruling Impacts Several Pillars of Trump’s Political Agenda

Austria: Jeff Bezos Is Not Solely To Blame for The Washington Post’s Decline

Austria: In His Blunt Manner, Vance Comes to Netanyahu’s Aid

Austria: Trump’s Solo Dream Is Over

Austria: The Harvard President’s Voluntary Pay Cut Is a Strong Signal

1 COMMENT

  1. I disagree that the U.S. is not providing leadership in the Middle East, but to see that leadership perhaps requires different eyes than those normally used, as it comes backed up by a big stick and out of the barrel of a gun. I submit that the U.S. is still under the control of neocon imperialists, bent on any type of domination necessary, including aggressive war, to secure American economic interests worldwide. However, I ask that peoples around the world not be deceived by the propaganda that has duped so many Americans over the years to support this agenda, or think that all Americans today agree with it. Recently, public figures like Ron Paul, Andrew Napolitano, Noam Chomsky, and Jesse Ventura have gained a few more ears with their reasoning and evidence that the U.S. has indeed gone astray from its own roots and own law. While public sentiment is changing, unfortunately it is not doing so fast enough to put Paul in office. In the short term, that is the only thing that will change the course my country is on. But in the long term, as the education of the American public undertaken by people like those above continues, things may change. If it is in time to prevent another war, probably with Iran, I doubt, but I agree with Elie Wiesel when he says we must live by hope.