Be Aware of US Military Base in Darwin

Published in Waspada
(Indonesia) on 7 December 2011
by Ramli Lubis (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Yuliana Sari. Edited by Katya Abazajian.
The news about the U.S. plan to put a military base in Darwin, Northern Australia in 2012 has been rolling around. The U.S. government plans to put 2,500 marines in an area of only 820 kilometers, or 500 miles.

The discourse increases as some problems arise in Papua, where there is a U.S. gold mining company. Thus, various parties see the military base movement as a step taken by the U.S. to advance its interests in Indonesia. Others think this has relation with U.S. interests in the Timor Sea and in natural resources in Indonesia.

A.C. Manullang, an intelligence analyst, delivered a harsh view: “The U.S. military base in Darwin will be used to liberate Papua.” According to Manullang, the existence of the military base in Darwin will make it easier for the U.S. to send its troops to Papua by hiding behind the reason of spreading peace. “Human rights violations that occurred in Papua may be a reason for the U.S. to send troops to Papua through the UN,” he said.

The Indonesian government hurriedly declared that the U.S. military base will bring no harm to Indonesia. The Indonesian Head of the State Intelligence Agency, Lt. Gen. Marciano Norman, said that we do not have to worry about the presence of the U.S. military base. According to him, the Indonesian president himself has expressed the opinion that the existence of the military base in Darwin is a result of cooperation between the U.S. and Australia (one of the U.S.’s allies).

“Regarding the issue of U.S. troops in Darwin, I think Mr. President has expressed his view that we highly respect the decision of the two countries,” said Norman in the Indonesian House of Representatives in Jakarta on Nov. 29, 2011.

Nevertheless, many parties see the presence of the U.S. military base in Darwin as a potential threat to Indonesian sovereignty. For a short period, it probably will not be a threat to Indonesia, but in the long run, we have to be wary of it. Surely, the decision to develop the military base may be a result of a geopolitical study for at least the next 20 years. Therefore, as a sovereign nation, Indonesia must anticipate this possibility by making a long-term strategy through intense international diplomacy and leadership in the development of the ASEAN region that meets national interests.

Facing China

After the Australian government approved the development of the U.S. military base, Australian newspaper, the Sydney Morning Herald, delivered an analysis related to China’s domination. They mentioned that the U.S. military base will be a force to rival Chinese influence in the ASEAN region. The U.S. wants to make sure that the Chinese military does not control the ASEAN and the Pacific region.

The Chinese government has issued a statement that they are holding military exercises in Pacific Islands region. This statement came after the announcement of the U.S. plan. However, the Chinese Defense Ministry told Reuters on Nov. 24 that the exercises are not intended to deter other countries because they also respect international law.

As a quickly rising country, China has strengthened its military power. China has created new submarines and ballistic missile defense systems in the sea. In 2010, China was seen to appear in Japanese, Vietnamese and Philippine waters. This led to diplomatic tension between China and the three countries.

The relationship between the U.S. and China became strained after the U.S. expressed its plan to place troops in Australia. Barack Obama said the U.S. military will soon operate combat aircrafts and ships in Australian waters. China has objected the plan and has begun to question the purpose of placing the U.S. troops in Darwin.

The U.S. argues that the placement of troops in Darwin is a form of U.S.-Australian alliance that has existed for a long time. The troops’ placement will also assist neighbor countries in the event of a natural disaster. However, China considers the placement of 2,500 U.S. personnel in Darwin as a threat to peace in Southeast Asia, which can lead to a new tension. Some areas in the ASEAN region may potentially bring local tensions, for example the Sparty island group claimed by Vietnam, the Philippines, Brunei and Malaysia. However, the ASEAN zone tends to be a peaceful zone, not a conflicted area. Thus, the placement of U.S. marines is inappropriate.

Alert

What actually is the U.S. agenda for Indonesia, Southeast Asia and even the Pacific? Australian opposition does not believe that it will be a provocation against China. The spokesman for opposition in the immigration field, Scott Morrison, said that the expansion will only serve as a covenant relationship between Australia and the United States.

Perhaps the placement of the U.S. troops in Australia was intended for other purposes, such as to await political changes in Indonesia, especially in Papua. Geographically, Darwin lies closer than other Southeast Asian regions to Papua, which has become the movement area of China.

We realize that the local residents in Papua are resisting Freeport. The company is 97 percent owned by U.S. investors and has been in operation since the early 1970s. In recent weeks, the company was continuously rocked by anarchist activities. Some U.S. citizens have become victims. In addition to the Freeport problem, more local residents are supporting the struggle of the separatists, who want to liberate Papua.

In the U.S., there has been a lobby that supports Papua to become an independent state. However, the U.S. government has always officially declined any allegations that led to the conclusion that Washington is involved in the politics in Papua.

Earlier, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and President Barack Obama spoke in Bali about policy concerning the U.S. Marines in Australia. They also discussed the association of the new plan with oil reserves in the Timor Gap, and how the U.S. views Indonesia's rich natural resources and strategic location in the Asian Pacific region that caused the U.S. to move its base from Okinawa, Japan to Darwin. The Timor Sea region has proven to have large oil reserves. The U.S. has a great interest in the oil in the Timor Sea.

In addition to maintaining political stability and security in the ASEAN region, the U.S. is concerned about the oil reserve in the Timor Sea because of the future need of the world after the U.S. failed to conquer the oil countries in the Middle East. The choice of Darwin and not Timor Leste is because of available international cooperation, especially from economic and human resources standpoints. From an economic point of view, Timor Leste has limited natural and human resources. In addition, Timor Leste is still dependent on other countries such as Portugal, and of course Indonesia.

Conclusion

If the presence of the U.S. military base in Darwin has the purpose of facing China in the Asia-Pacific region, maintaining political stability and security in the ASEAN region, getting involved directly in the activities in the Asian Pacific region due to oil reserves, and even getting involved directly in Papuan problems, then Indonesia must inevitably be aware of the presence of the U.S. base, because it becomes a potential threat to the state sovereignty. The Indonesian government should not consider the presence of the military base in Darwin a trivial issue. We must take steps for long-term anticipation.


Oposisi Australia tidak mempercayai kemungkinan perluasan kehadiran militer Amerika Serikat di Australia yang merupakan tindakan provokasi terhadap China.

Wacana tentang rencana pemerintah Amerika Serikat menempatkan pangkalan militernya di Darwin, Australia Utara pada 2012 telah bergulir sedemikian rupa. Pemerintah AS rencananya akan menempatkan 2.500 marinir mereka di sana pangkalan tersebut—daerah yang hanya berjarak 820 km (500 mil).
 
Wacana ini seiring semakin mencuatnya persoalan di Papua, di mana ada perusahaan pertambangan emas Amerika Serikat yang beroperasi di sana. Maka berbagai pihak kemudian menangkap isu ini sebagai langkah AS untuk mengedepankan kepentingannya di Indonesia pada umumnya. Ada juga yang menangkap langkah AS ini terkait kepentingan mereka di Laut Timor dan sumber daya alam (SDM) Indonesia.
Setidaknya, pandangan keras disampaikan pengamat intelijen AC Manullang kepada media massa. “Pangkalan militer AS di Darwin akan digunakan untuk memerdekakan Papua,” katanya. Menurut Manullang, keberadaan pangkalan itu akan memudahkan AS mengirimkan pasukan ke Papua dengan alasan untuk perdamaian. “Pelanggaran HAM yang terjadi di Papua akan menjadi alasan AS melalui PBB mengirimkan pasukannya di Papua,” ungkapnya.
Meski pemerintah Indonesia telah buru-buru menyatakan bahwa pangkalan militer AS itu tidak berbahaya bagi Indonesia. Kepala Badan Intelijen Negara (BIN), Letnan Jenderal TNI Marciano Norman misalnya. Dia menyatakan, keberadaan pangkalan militer AS itu tidak perlu dicemaskan. Menurutnya, Presiden SBY sendiri sudah menyatakan pandangannya mengenai keberadaan pangkalan militer Amerika di Darwin adalah kerjasama diantara Amerika dan Australia--negara sekutunya.
"Soal pasukan Amerika yang ada di Darwin, saya rasa Pak Presiden telah menyampaikan pandangannya bahwa kita sangat menghormati keputusan kedua negara," ujar Marciano di DPR RI, Jakarta, Selasa 29 November 2011.
Tapi banyak pihak memandang keberadaan pangkalan militer AS di Darwin, merupakan potensi ancaman kedaulatan NKRI. Jika dalam jangka pendek kehadirannya bukan merupakan ancaman bagi Indonesia, namun dalam jangka panjang, maka itu adalah sebuah ancaman yang mesti diwaspadai. Karena tentunya, keputusan AS menempatkan pangkalan militer di Darwin sebagai hasil kajian geopolitik penguasaan kawasan dalam jangka panjang 20 tahun ke depan, dan bukan semata untuk kepentingan parsial saat ini. Maka sebagai bangsa besar yang berdaulat, Indonesia harus melakukan antisipasi strategi jangka panjang, melalui intensitas diplomasi internasional dan kepemimpinan pembangunan kawasan ASEAN yang berorientasi kepentingan nasional. 

Menghadang China
Ketika pemerintah Australia sudah menyetujui dibangunnya pangkalan militer AS di Darwin Koran Australia, Sydney Morning Herald menurunkan analisisnya yang terkait dominasi China. Pangkalan itu disebut-sebut akan menjadi kekuatan untuk menandingi China di kawasan ASEAN. AS, katanya, sangat berkepentingan agar ASEAN dan kawasan Pasifik tidak secara militer tidak dikuasai China.
Pemerintah China sendiri telah mengeluarkan pernyataan akan mengadakan latihan militer di wilayah Kepulauan Pasifik. Pernyataan ini muncul setelah rencana AS tersebut. "Latihan ini merupakan sebuah program rutin yang sudah direncanakan. Latihan ini tidak ditujukan untuk menghadang negara lain. Kami pun menghormati hukum internasional," ujar Departemen Pertahanan China, seperti dikutip Reuters, Kamis (24/11/2011).
Sebagai negara yang sedang “naik daun”, China telah memperkuat kekuatan militernya. China telah menciptakan kapal selam baru dan juga sistem pertahanan misil balistik di laut. Pada 2010 lalu, China juga tampak melintas di perairan Jepang, Vietnam, dan Filipina. Hal ini menyebabkan ketegangan diplomatik antara China dan ketiga negara itu.
Hubungan kedua negara menegang setelah AS mengutarakan rencana penempatan pasukannya di Darwin. Presiden AS, Barack Obama mengatakan, militer AS akan segera mengoperasikan pesawat dan kapal tempurnya di perairan Australia. China pun merasa keberatan atas sikap AS. China juga sudah mulai mempertanyakan maksud penempatan pasukan AS di Darwin.
AS beralasan bahwa penempatan pasukannya di Darwin merupakan bentuk dari aliansi AS dan Australia yang sudah terjalin sejak dulu. Penempatan pasukan itu juga ditujukan untuk membantu negara di wilayah yang bersangkutan dalam hal penanganan bencana alam.
Namun China menilai bahwa penempatan 2.500 personel Marinir AS di Darwin, sebagai ancaman bagi situasi damai di Asia Tenggara. Sebab, hal ini dinilai dapat menimbulkan ketegangan baru. Selama ini wilayah ASEAN merupakan zona damai dan bukan wilayah konflik. Sehingga penempatan marinir AS di sana dinilai tidak tepat. Namun ada wilayah yang berpotensi dapat menimbulkan ketegangan lokal, seperti masalah gugus pulau Spartly yang diklaim oleh Vietnam, Filipina, Brunei dan Malaysia.

Waspada
Apa sebetulnya yang menjadi agenda AS di Indonesia, Asia Tenggara bahkan Pasifik? Pihak oposisi Australia mengatakan mereka tidak mempercayai kemungkinan perluasan kehadiran militer Amerika Serikat di Australia yang merupakan tindakan provokasi terhadap China. Juru bicara oposisi bidang Imigrasi, Scott Morrison mengatakan perluasan tersebut hanya berfungsi sebagai hubungan persekutuan antara Australia dan Amerika Serikat.
Maka boleh jadi penempatan pasukan AS di Australia lebih dimaksudkan untuk kepentingan lain. Seperti untuk mengantisipasi perubahan politik yang bakal terjadi di Indonesia, khususnya di Papua. Sebab secara geografis, letak Darwin lebih dekat dengan Papua ketimbang wilayah Asia Tenggara yang menjadi daerah pergerakan China.
Kita menyadari bahwa sat ini di Provinsi Papua sedang muncul penolakan oleh penduduk setempat atas PT Freeport. Padahal perusahaan yang 97% sahamnya dimiliki investor AS itu, sudah beroperasi sejak awal 1970-an. Dalam beberapa pekan terakhir, Freeport juga terus digoyang oleh kegiatan bersifat anarkis. Warga AS sudah ada yang menjadi korban. Selain soal Freeport, penduduk lokal makin ramai mendukung perjuangan kelompok separatis yang mau memerdekakan Papua.
Di AS sendiri sudah lama terbentuk sebuah lobi yang menginginkan agar Papua didukung menjadi sebuah negara merdeka. Walaupun pemerintah AS secara resmi selalu membantah setiap tudingan yang mengarah kepada kesimpulan bahwa Washington ikut bermain politik di Papua.
Sebelumnya, Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dan Presiden AS Barack Obama di Bali, pekan lalu, sempat menyinggung kebijakan marinir AS di Australia. Terkait dengan cadangan minyak di Celah Timor serta bagaimana AS memandang Indonesia yang kaya Sumber Daya Alam dan strategis di Asia Pasifik sehingga menggeser pangkalan dari Okinawa, Jepang ke Tenggara di Darwin. Wilayah laut Timor memiliki cadangan minyak yang sangat tinggi dan Amerika Serikat memiliki kepentingan yang besar atas minyak di Laut Timor.

Selain untuk menjaga stabilitas politik dan keamanan di kawasan ASEAN, AS juga berkepentingan atas cadangan minyak di Laut Timor untuk kebutuhan dunia di masa datang setelah gagal menaklukkan negara-negara minyak di kawasan Timur Tengah. Mengenai pilihan ke Darwin dan bukan ke Timor Leste, dalam hubungan kerja sama internasional, selalu dilihat dari sudut pandang ekonomi dan sumber daya manusia maupun sumber daya alam yang dimiliki sebuah negara. Timor Leste dari segi ekonomi dan sumber daya alam maupun sumber daya manusia masih terbatas. Selain itu, dalam hubungan ketatanegaraan, Timor Leste juga masih bergantung pada negara lain seperti Portugal dan juga tentu Indonesia.

Kesimpulan
Jikapun kehadiran pangkalan militer AS di Darwin adalah untuk menghadang pergerakan China di kawasan Asia Fasifik--menjaga stabilitas politik dan keamanan di kawasan ASEAN-- apalagi untuk terlibat langsung di kawasan Asia Fasifik terkait cadangan minyak. Lebih menjurus lagi, jika kehadiran pangkalan militer itu untuk terlibat langsung pada persoalan di Papua.

Maka mau tidak mau, Indonesia harus mewaspadai kehadiran pangkalan AS itu, karena berpotensi menjadi ancaman kedaulatan negara. Pemerintah Indonesia tidak boleh menganggap sepele dengan kehadiran pangkalan militer di Darwin tetapi harus mengambil langkah-langkah untuk antisipasi jangka panjang.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Portugal: Kissinger: Beyond Good and Evil*

India: When Biden’s Away

U.A.E.: Why Xi and Biden’s G-20 Meeting Was a Masterclass in Deescalation

China: Long-Awaited Scene between China and the US Gives the World Relief