US Military Aims to Be Greener

Published in Die Zeit
(Germany) on 12 April 2012
by Marlies Uken (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Sidonie Straughn-Morse. Edited by Peter McGuire.
When it comes to calculations for fuel and electricity for its troops, the American defense secretary would surely like to dispense with the numbers: The Pentagon estimates expenses of $150 billion over the next decade. The U.S. military is the world’s largest consumer of energy. In 2010 alone, the U.S. armed forces used 125 million barrels of oil. In comparison, all of Germany used about 911 million barrels that year, according to the CIA Factbook.

Yet dependency on oil leaves one open to attack. In 2007, attacks on tanker trucks in Afghanistan accounted for more than a third of Army incidents; in Iraq it was 12 percent.

That has led to a new and remarkable alliance: From now on, the U.S. eco-lobby and the military will be cooperating. The U.S. Army aims to increase its share of green energy to around 25 percent by 2025. For this they will receive approximately $7 billion. The military will use these funds to finance the development of more powerful power transformers, more efficient batteries and solar parks.

So what should we think about these developments? Klaus Topfer, former Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Program, regularly states that climate policy is, above all, peace policy. With these reports, that message takes on a whole new meaning.


Auf die Tank- und Stromrechnung seiner Truppen würde der amerikanische Verteidigungsminister sicher gerne verzichten: 150 Milliarden US-Dollar veranschlagt das Pentagon für das nächste Jahrzehnt. Das US-Militär gilt als größter Energieverbraucher der Welt, allein im Jahr 2010 verbrauchte es 125 Millionen Barrel Öl (zum Vergleich: Ganz Deutschland verbrauchte in dem Jahr laut CIA Factbook rund 911 Millionen Barrel).

Doch die Ölabhängigkeit macht angreifbar. Allein in Afghanistan waren im Jahr 2007 mehr als ein Drittel der Armee-Unfälle Anschläge auf Tanklaster, im Irak waren es zwölf Prozent.

Daher kommt es jetzt zu einer neuen, bemerkenswerten Allianz: Die Ökolobby in den USA und das Militär kooperieren zukünftig. Bis 2025 will die US-Armee ihren Ökostromanteil auf rund 25 Prozent erhöhen. Dafür nimmt sie in den kommenden Jahren rund sieben Milliarden US-Dollar in die Hand. Damit finanziert das Militär etwa die Entwicklung von leistungsstärkeren Stromtransformatoren, von effizienteren Batterien und Solarparks.

Tja, was ist jetzt von solchen Entwicklungen zu halten? Klaus Töpfer, Ex-Chef des Umweltprogramms der Vereinten Nationen, spricht ja regelmäßig davon, dass Klimapolitik vor allem auch Friedenspolitik sei. Das bekommt bei solchen Meldungen eine ganz neue Bedeutung.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Israel: Trump’s Illusion: From Tehran 2026 to Munich 1938

Australia: Can 1 Optimal Pathway Have 2 Lanes? When It Comes to AUKUS Submarines, Apparently Yes

Kenya: Planned US Ebola Quarantine Center a Typical Case of Ethical Dumping

Germany: Trump Has Miscalculated Again Regarding US Arms Sales to Taiwan

Germany: US Imperial Outpost in Space

Topics

South Africa: US World Cup Shenanigans Exposes FIFA’s Double Standards

Saudi Arabia: The Pro-Israel Lobby and US Military ‘Cooperation’

India: US, China Playing Dangerous Gen Z Game in Nepal

Germany: What the National Guard Is Really Contributing in Washington*

Germany: US Imperial Outpost in Space

Brazil: Terrorism To Suit the Customer’s Taste*

Jordan: War for the Occupation

South Africa: Where’s My Phone? My Golden Trump Phone!

Related Articles

Germany: Trump’s Fatal Signal to Putin*

Austria: Trump Punishes Merz but Also Weakens His Own Country

South Korea: Trump’s Move To Cut Troops in Germany Must Not Affect Korean Peninsula

Poland: Polish PM Donald Tusk Questions US Loyalty in Financial Times, Targeting Both Parties

Germany: Europe Must Not Allow Itself To Be Drawn into Trump’s War