Televised Debates

Published in La Vanguardia
(Spain) on 4 October 2012
by José Antich (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Bianca Fierro. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
The U.S. presidential election is a little more than a month away; the election will be November 6. President Barack Obama and the Republican candidate, Mitt Romney, have faced each other in the first televised debate out of the scheduled three. It is a sound democratic exercise since it permits a contrast of programs and the opportunity for each candidate to punish the weaker sides of his adversary, as has happened in more than one occasion since the first televised debate which took place between Kennedy and Nixon in 1960.

Different democracies have continued to incorporate this new situation, almost as a rule, to the point where the person who has refused it has been placed in a bad position before public opinion. In Spain, we had to wait until 1993 for there to be a televised debate — the candidates were Felipe González and José María Aznar — and even today there have only been five of them. In Catalonia, not even that: Pujol, Maragall and Montilla have systematically denied participating in any two-person debate on television, and only accepted in 2003 then-candidate Mas Maragall's taking the stage in a debate for which La Vanguardia had exclusive media coverage.

In this election, obviously, the debate is going to repeat itself; that is why one should appreciate that the First Secretary of the Socialist Party of Catalonia opened debate proposing an innovative formula given the peculiar multiparty in Catalonia, in which the weight of the second party is not in Spain. Navarro has proposed a three-way debate between Convergence and Union, the Socialist Party of Catalonia and the People’s Party, and has even chosen the channel: 8tv. The offer has been accepted by the President of the People’s Party, Alicia Sánchez-Camacho. Let’s hope that in the next couple of days the organizers of the campaign for Convergence and Union and Mas will also accept.


CUANDO falta algo más de un mes para las elecciones presidenciales en EE.UU. -los comicios serán el 6 de noviembre-, el presidente Barak Obama y el aspirante republicano, Mitt Romney, se habrán visto las caras esta madrugada en el primer debate televisado de los tres que hay previstos. Es un ejercicio democrático saludable ya que permite contrastar programas y da la oportunidad a los candidatos de castigar los flancos más débiles de su adversario, como ha pasado en más de una ocasión desde el primer debate televisado que tuvo lugar entre Kennedy y Nixon en 1960. Las diferentes democracias han ido incorporando casi como una norma esta nueva situación hasta situar en una muy mala posición ante la opinión pública a los que se han negado a ello. En España hubo que esperar a 1993 para que hubiera un cara a cara televisado, y lo protagonizaron Felipe González y José María Aznar, y hasta la fecha sólo han tenido lugar cinco. En Catalunya, casi ni eso: Pujol, Maragall y Montilla se negaron sistemáticamente a protagonizar ningún debate a dos en televisión, y tan sólo aceptaron en el 2003 los entonces aspirante Maragall y Mas a protagonizar uno en La Vanguardia para su exclusiva publicación en el diario. En estas elecciones, obviamente, el debate se va a volver a repetir y por eso es de agradecer que el primer secretario del PSC haya abierto el fuego proponiendo una fórmula novedosa dada la peculiaridad multipartidista de Catalunya, en que el peso del segundo partido tampoco es como en España. Navarro ha propuesto un debate a tres entre CiU, PSC y PP, y ha escogido incluso el canal: 8tv. El guante ya lo ha recogido Alicia Sánchez-Camacho, que ha aceptado. Esperemos que en los próximos días los responsables de campaña de CiU acepten y Mas también diga que sí.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Topics

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Germany: We Should Take Advantage of Trump’s Vacuum*

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?