Radar Construction Begins: Disclose Information to Locals

Published in Kyoto Shimbun
(Japan) on 28 May 2014
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Courtney Coppernoll. Edited by Kyrstie Lane.
Construction has begun on the “Kyogamisaki Communication Site” in Kyotango, Tangocho. This site will become the sole U.S. military base in the Kinki region.

There are plans here to deploy “X-band radar,” which is used for the purpose of ballistic missile detection. Beginning construction marks a critical juncture in this project's progress, yet the ministry of defense contacted local residents about it only yesterday afternoon. This incident abruptly illustrated the difficulties of making sure the U.S. military, the partner in this venture, reflects the desires of locals.

Apparently, though, the “advance notice” that had been requested by the prefecture and Kyotango was not complied with. Prefectural Governor Keiji Yamada and local city Mayor Yasushi Nakayama have said the ministry of defense has a responsibility to strongly and persistently see to it that information is honestly disclosed.

In the event of an attack on countries like Guam, such as North Korea firing missiles, the X-band radar could be established as an early warning system. At a summit meeting between Japanese and American leaders in February last year, the two countries reached an agreement on a second mobile communication site being deployed in Aomori prefecture.

In September, the prefecture and city received an announcement, which stated that they could expect that local residents' safety and security was guaranteed. From there, while the government continued with procuring the site, locals proposed seven points to the ministry of defense. These points included things like “publishing the results of preliminary investigations into electromagnetic waves, water quality and noise,” and “a presentation on restricted areas and flight paths.” However, they have yet to receive sufficient answers from the ministry.

With regard to construction information, the ministry of defense promised speedy transmissions to locals, but in addition to “damaging the relationship of mutual trust with the U.S.,” the ministry also failed to clarify the day for beginning construction. Mayor Nakayama said he accepted these dealings with the U.S. on “good faith,” but that these proceedings are incomprehensible. Together with Governor Yamada, he had stated that “if we have no guarantee of safety, it's probable that we'll call for repeal.” Such a remark should not be forgotten.

It has been made clear that the Kyogamisaki Communication Site will not be jointly instituted with Japan's Self-Defense Forces; it will be the exclusive domain of the U.S. military.

Due to the fact that Japan is hampered by the Japan-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement, examples of the U.S. military's tendency to not inform locals about their proceedings are not unusual. Last fall there was an opposition movement against the U.S. military in Iwakuni, Yamaguchi over their failure to identify the flights paths for Osprey training in Takeshima. Also in Iwakuni, the U.S. military began the construction of military residences and didn't notify local residents until just prior to starting.

In the future, since confidentiality is so high on the U.S. military's part, we should refrain from taking in radar systems or starting operations for bases. Even if we assume there is some secrecy for security reasons, keeping everything a secret and appearing to ignore the local area's concerns will only increase people's distrust. Wanting to have a guarantee of safety during construction is perfectly natural. A local liaison committee established by the city and prefecture governments, prefectural police and the ministry of defense would adequately serve the purpose. There is a need for such a committee to attempt to problem solve and to disclose accurate information.

Previously, areas that have military bases have raised concerns over scandals relating to U.S. military personnel, and these areas are earnestly seeking a review of the Japan-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement. Kyoto is also affected by this issue. The Japanese government should not be timid in putting strong effort toward drastic reform in this area.


レーダー着工  地元に情報を開示せよ

近畿地方唯一となる米軍基地「経ケ岬通信所」の工事が京丹後市丹後町で始まった。

 弾道ミサイル探知に向けて「Xバンドレーダー」を配備する計画だが、着工という節目にもかかわらず、防衛省からの地元への連絡は前日午後だった。米軍相手に地元の意思を反映させることの難しさをいきなり突き付けられた形だ。

 府と京丹後市が要望してきた「早めの事前通達」は聞き入れられたとはいえない。山田啓二知事と中山泰市長は防衛省に対して、誠意を持って情報開示に努めるよう粘り強く求める責任がある。

 レーダーは北朝鮮のミサイルを想定し、グアムなどへの攻撃に備えて設ける。昨年2月の日米首脳会談で合意、青森県の米軍車力通信所に次ぐ2番目の配備になる。

 府と市は9月、「住民の安全安心が確保される見通しがついた」として受け入れを表明した。以降用地確保が進んだ一方で、地元が防衛省に投げかけた「電磁波、水質、騒音の事前調査の結果公表」「立入禁止区域や飛行制限区域の提示」など7項目の申し入れには十分な回答が得られないままだ。

 防衛省は工事情報に関して、速やかな伝達を地元に約束していたが、「米との信頼関係を損なう」として、いつ着工日をつかんでいたのかも明らかにしなかった。中山市長は国の対応を「誠実」と評価したが、理解に苦しむ。山田知事とともに「安全確保がなければ撤回要請もありうる」と発言してきたことを忘れてはならない。

 経ケ岬通信所が自衛隊との共同利用施設ではなく、米軍専用区域であることも明らかになった。

 日米地位協定に阻まれ、米軍の動向が地元に伝えらない例は珍しくない。昨秋の高島市でのオスプレイの訓練では飛来ルートが明かされず、反対運動のあった山口県岩国市の米軍住宅着工も事前連絡は直前だったという。

 今後、より機密性が高いレーダーの搬入や基地の運用開始が控える。安全保障上の機密があるとしても何でも秘密にしたり、地元要望をないがしろにするようでは住民の不信感は募るばかりだ。工事中の安全確保はもちろん、市と府、府警、防衛省と設けた現地連絡会を十分機能させ、正確な情報開示や課題解決を図る必要がある。

 先行して基地を抱える地域では米兵らによる不祥事に悩み、日米地位協定の見直しを切望している。京都も無関係ではいられない。抜本的な改定に向けた努力を政府は惜しんではならない。

[京都新聞 2014年05月28日掲載]
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Europe Last

Venezuela: Neither State of the Union nor Commonwealth nor Bolivarian Republic: The Republic of Venezuela

     

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump’s Tariffs: EU/US Trade Deal under Pressure

Saudi Arabia: King’s Visit Takes the Edge off Strained UK-US Relationship

Topics

Saudi Arabia: Iran War: Cup Moving Toward the Lip?

South Africa: UN Security Council’s Veto Powers Bite back the US

Austria: Trump Punishes Merz but Also Weakens His Own Country

Austria: Trump Can’t Destroy NATO

South Korea: Trump’s Move To Cut Troops in Germany Must Not Affect Korean Peninsula

Germany: Europe Last

Japan: Attack on Iran: Ending the Battle Is the Main Priority

Related Articles

India: How US Is ‘Rediscovering’ Japan to Check China

Taiwan: As US-China Discuss New World Order, What Deterrence Can a Hollowed-Out Taiwan Find?

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Nigeria: 80 Years after Hiroshima, Nagasaki Atomic Bombings: Any Lesson?

Taiwan: Trump’s Japan Negotiation Strategy: Implications for Taiwan