Immigration: Washington’s Closed

Published in La Jornada
(Mexico) on 1 July 2014
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Laura L. Messer. Edited by Bora Mici.
Through its Speaker John Boehner, the United States House of Representatives delivered a blow to Barack Obama yesterday by warning him there will not be any immigration reform for the rest of this year. It is understood that the refusal includes the leader’s request to Congress to approve additional funds in order to repatriate the thousands of Central American minors who have been detained for entering U.S. territory without documents.

In order to put the phenomenon into context, it is worth remembering that since last October, our neighboring country’s authorities have arrested over 52,000 children, who attempted to cross the border on their own. For its part, the Mexican National Institute of Migration affirms having rescued over 10,000 who were passing through national territory. Such figures may represent only the tip of the iceberg in a much larger flow, whose current increase lacked an accurate explanation, until now.

It has been said that the growing number of those underage migrants originated from a misunderstanding of U.S. government regulations in Central America; it has also been confirmed that organized crime groups spread the false rumor that Washington would grant entry to children whose parents reside in the United States. Even further, Republican factions in the Capitol have accused the White House of having instigated the wave as a way of pressuring Congress to approve a legal framework oriented toward the legalization of millions of undocumented immigrants and toward legalizing new ingresses of foreigners to the country.

Independently of the circumstantial causes that favored the increase in the migration of minors, the structural roots of migratory flow from Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras toward the U.S. are misery, violence and a general lack of prospects for life, work and safety, which affect a good part of the population of these fellow countries. In the gestation of those conditions, Washington has an enormous historical responsibility for its policies of intervention, boosting oligarchic dictatorships, armed conflicts and economic depredation.

Following the signing of the peace agreements in El Salvador and Guatemala, the respective American embassies imposed ironclad, neoliberal policies on docile rulers that caused the same social and institutional disasters they have caused in other nations, plus another—criminal violence, which is explained not only by poverty, inequality and the traditional causes that are unresolved and aggravated by war, but also by the proliferation of weapons and unemployment, without more workforce preparation than military training. The finishing touch was the counterproductive war on drugs, another directive imposed by the United States on various Latin American nations, and the indiscriminate approval of free trade agreements, which inaugurated the unrestricted movement of capital and merchandise, but vetoed that of people.

In short, the so-called human crisis of migration springs from social hells designed in Washington. With this fact in mind, the least that could be asked of the U.S. executive and legislative branches is that they receive the disaster refugees. However, following his reelection the year before last, Obama let the opportunity pass by to consistently push for immigration reform, such that the Capitol has definitively closed the door, at least for this year.

From what can be seen, under such circumstances, the White House will not be able to send the detained minors back to their countries of origin, nor will it have any other option than to toughen its border surveillance and intensify police persecution of immigrants, both adults and minors. As a consequence, an unknown number of minors will remain trapped in the warehouses set up as jails in the south of U.S. territory, and dangers will multiply for those exposed when attempting to cross the border between our country and the northern power. The times demand that the Mexican government act with a humanitarian and fraternal understanding. It is expected to do so.


Por medio de su presidente, John Boehner, la Cámara de Representantes de Estados Unidos dio ayer un varapalo a Barack Obama, al advertirle que en lo que queda de este año no habrá reforma migratoria. Se entiende que la negativa abarca la petición del mandatario al Legislativo de aprobar fondos adicionales para repatriar a los miles de menores centroamericanos que han sido detenidos por internarse en territorio estadunidense sin documentos.

Para poner el fenómeno en contexto, cabe recordar que desde octubre pasado las autoridades del país vecino han arrestado a más de 52 mil niños que intentaban pasar la frontera por cuenta propia. Por su parte, el Instituto Nacional de Migración (INM) afirma haber rescatado a más de 10 mil que transitaban por el territorio nacional. Tales cifras podrían representar sólo la punta del iceberg de un flujo mucho mayor cuyo incremento coyuntural carece, hasta ahora, de explicación precisa.

Se ha dicho que el crecimiento en el número de esos migrantes menores se originó por un mal entendimiento, en Centroamérica, de disposiciones gubernamentales estadunidenses; se ha afirmado también que grupos de la delincuencia organizada han difundido la especie –falsa– de que Washington daría entrada a niños cuyos padres residieran en Estados Unidos. Más aún, sectores republicanos en el Capitolio han acusado a la Casa Blanca de haber instigado esa oleada como forma de presionar al Congreso para que aprobara un marco legal orientado a regularización a millones de indocumentados y a regular nuevos ingresos de extranjeros al país.

Independientemente de las causas circunstanciales que propiciaron el incremento de la migración de menores, las raíces estructurales del flujo migratorio de Guatemala, El Salvador y Honduras hacia Estados Unidos son la miseria, la violencia y, en general, la falta de perspectivas de vida, trabajo y seguridad que afecta a buena parte de las poblaciones de esos países hermanos. Y en la gestación de esas condiciones Wa-shington tiene una enorme responsabilidad histórica por sus políticas de injerencia, impulso a las dictaduras oligárquicas y conflictos bélicos, y depredación económica.

Tras las firmas de los acuerdos de paz en El Salvador y Guatemala, las respectivas embajadas estadunidenses impusieron a gobernantes dóciles férreas políticas neoliberales que provocaron los mismos desastres sociales e institucionales que han causado en otras naciones, más otro: una violencia delictiva que se explica no sólo por la pobreza y la desigualdad tradicionales, irresueltas y agravadas por la guerra, sino también por la proliferación de armamento y de desempleados sin más capacitación laboral que el entrenamiento militar. Las puntillas fueron la contraproducente guerra contra las drogas –otra directiva impuesta por Estados Unidos a diversas naciones de América Latina– y la aprobación indiscriminada de tratados de libre comercio que inauguraron el tránsito irrestricto de capitales y de mercancías, pero vetaron el de las personas.

La llamada crisis humana de la migración deriva, en suma, de infiernos sociales diseñados en Washington. Con ese dato en mente lo menos que cabría pedir al Ejecutivo y el Legislativo de Estados Unidos es que recibieran a los refugiados del desastre. Sin embargo, Obama dejó pasar el momento derivado de su relección, el año antepasado, para impulsar en forma consistente la reforma migratoria a la que el Capitolio ha cerrado la puerta en forma definitiva, al menos para este año.

En tales circunstancias, la Casa Blanca no podrá, a lo que puede verse, ni siquiera enviar de vuelta a sus países de origen a los menores detenidos, ni tendrá más opción que endurecer su vigilancia fronteriza e intensificar la persecución policial contra los migrantes, adultos y menores. En consecuencia, un número incierto de menores quedarán atrapados en las bodegas instaladas como cárceles en el sur del territorio estadunidense y se multiplicarán los peligros a los que están expuestos quienes pretenden cruzar la línea fronteriza entre nuestro país y la potencia del norte. El momento demanda que el Estado mexicano actúe con sentido humanitario y fraterno. Cabe esperar que lo haga.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Russia: Bagram Absurdity*

   

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Thailand: Southeast Asia Amid the US-China Rift

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Topics

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Related Articles

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Mexico: US Pushes for Submission

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Afghanistan: Defeat? Strategic Withdrawal? Maneuver?