Trump’s Contradictions on Supply Management

Published in Le Devoir
(Canada) on 5 September 2018
by Marcel Perron (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Beth Holding. Edited by Nkem Okafor.
As I write these words, we still do not know the results of negotiations concerning the latest draft of the North American Free Trade Agreement. It seems, however, that U.S. negotiators have targeted supply management, a dispute resolution mechanism, as well as cultural exemptions. If a compromise must be reached in these areas, Quebec will come out the loser.

When it suits him, Donald Trump is quick to contradict himself to win the bet. Consider the commercial politics imposed on his neighbors: tariffs on softwood lumber, acid, aluminum, imported vehicles and so forth. Don’t such protectionist measures aim to protect U.S. employment and economy from foreign competitors? Doesn’t supply management pursue the same objectives for Quebec? By seeking to protect milk, eggs and chicken from foreign adversaries, these sectors strive to maintain job security and safeguard the survival of their industries. If it’s good for Trump, it must be good for Quebecois dairy farmers and producers.

In this sparring match, Trump wishes to choose the opposing players, set the rules of the game, appoint the umpires and accuse the competition of cheating. In this climate of confusion and contradictions, doesn’t Trump risk falling prey to his own trap, his desire to win the advantage at all costs, in his judgment and in his behavior?




Au moment où ces lignes sont écrites, on ne connaît pas encore les résultats de la négociation concernant une nouvelle mouture de l’ALENA. Il semble cependant que les négociateurs américains ont ciblé la gestion de l’offre, l’exception culturelle ainsi que le règlement des différends. S’il devait y avoir des compromis sur ces questions, le Québec en sortirait perdant.

Lorsque cela fait son affaire, Trump n’hésite pas à se contredire pour gagner la mise. Quelle politique commerciale applique-t-il envers ses voisins : tarifs sur le bois d’oeuvre, sur l’acier, sur l’aluminium, sur l’auto, etc. Ces mesures protectionnistes n’ont-elles pas pour but de protéger les emplois et l’économie américaine quant aux concurrents étrangers ? La gestion de l’offre ne vise-t-elle pas les mêmes objectifs pour le Québec ? En voulant soustraire le lait, les oeufs et le poulet de la concurrence étrangère, ces secteurs veulent maintenir une stabilité de l’emploi et permettre la survie de leurs industries. Si c’est bon pour Trump, cela devrait l’être aussi pour les producteurs du Québec.

Dans cette joute, Trump désire choisir les joueurs adverses, fixer les règles du jeu, nommer les arbitres et accuser ses adversaires de tricherie. Dans ce climat de confusion et de contradictions, Trump ne risque-t-il pas de compter dans son propre filet, tellement sa volonté de gagner à tout prix le biaise dans son jugement et dans ses comportements ?
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Turkey: Yes, the US Will Shrink Back into Its Shell

Japan: National Guard Shooting in US Capital: Misguided Incitement of Anti-Foreign Doctrine

Israel: The Problem Is US Warm Ties with Turkey and Qatar

Spain: Trump’s Anti-Europe Doctrine

Canada: Ron DeSantis Says Florida Tourism Is Doing just Fine without Doug Ford

Topics

Japan: US National Security Strategy: New Concerns about Isolationism

Spain: Trump’s Anti-Europe Doctrine

El Salvador: A Pardon with Geopolitical Significance: Trump, Hernández and the Honduran Right Wing

Spain: A Warning That’s Impossible To Ignore

Germany: One Should Take It as an Honor

Ireland: Trump’s Disturbing National Security Strategy Should Be Required Reading

Saudi Arabia: Pro-Israel Influences Targeting US Churches

Related Articles

Japan: US National Security Strategy: New Concerns about Isolationism

El Salvador: A Pardon with Geopolitical Significance: Trump, Hernández and the Honduran Right Wing

Germany: One Should Take It as an Honor

Ireland: Trump’s Disturbing National Security Strategy Should Be Required Reading