Trump’s Contradictions on Supply Management

Published in Le Devoir
(Canada) on 5 September 2018
by Marcel Perron (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Beth Holding. Edited by Nkem Okafor.
As I write these words, we still do not know the results of negotiations concerning the latest draft of the North American Free Trade Agreement. It seems, however, that U.S. negotiators have targeted supply management, a dispute resolution mechanism, as well as cultural exemptions. If a compromise must be reached in these areas, Quebec will come out the loser.

When it suits him, Donald Trump is quick to contradict himself to win the bet. Consider the commercial politics imposed on his neighbors: tariffs on softwood lumber, acid, aluminum, imported vehicles and so forth. Don’t such protectionist measures aim to protect U.S. employment and economy from foreign competitors? Doesn’t supply management pursue the same objectives for Quebec? By seeking to protect milk, eggs and chicken from foreign adversaries, these sectors strive to maintain job security and safeguard the survival of their industries. If it’s good for Trump, it must be good for Quebecois dairy farmers and producers.

In this sparring match, Trump wishes to choose the opposing players, set the rules of the game, appoint the umpires and accuse the competition of cheating. In this climate of confusion and contradictions, doesn’t Trump risk falling prey to his own trap, his desire to win the advantage at all costs, in his judgment and in his behavior?




Au moment où ces lignes sont écrites, on ne connaît pas encore les résultats de la négociation concernant une nouvelle mouture de l’ALENA. Il semble cependant que les négociateurs américains ont ciblé la gestion de l’offre, l’exception culturelle ainsi que le règlement des différends. S’il devait y avoir des compromis sur ces questions, le Québec en sortirait perdant.

Lorsque cela fait son affaire, Trump n’hésite pas à se contredire pour gagner la mise. Quelle politique commerciale applique-t-il envers ses voisins : tarifs sur le bois d’oeuvre, sur l’acier, sur l’aluminium, sur l’auto, etc. Ces mesures protectionnistes n’ont-elles pas pour but de protéger les emplois et l’économie américaine quant aux concurrents étrangers ? La gestion de l’offre ne vise-t-elle pas les mêmes objectifs pour le Québec ? En voulant soustraire le lait, les oeufs et le poulet de la concurrence étrangère, ces secteurs veulent maintenir une stabilité de l’emploi et permettre la survie de leurs industries. Si c’est bon pour Trump, cela devrait l’être aussi pour les producteurs du Québec.

Dans cette joute, Trump désire choisir les joueurs adverses, fixer les règles du jeu, nommer les arbitres et accuser ses adversaires de tricherie. Dans ce climat de confusion et de contradictions, Trump ne risque-t-il pas de compter dans son propre filet, tellement sa volonté de gagner à tout prix le biaise dans son jugement et dans ses comportements ?
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Culture War in the US: Ruling against the 1.8% Who Are Transgender

Japan: New York State Legislature Bill Abolishing the Writing of Mother and Father Is Strange

Egypt: Egypt and the United States: Building the Next Generation of Strategic Partnership

Saudi Arabia: Could There Be a NATO Without the US?

Topics

Mexico: The End of the USMCA: A Turning Point for Emancipation

Japan: New York State Legislature Bill Abolishing the Writing of Mother and Father Is Strange

Saudi Arabia: Could There Be a NATO Without the US?

Saudi Arabia: NATO’s Photo-Op in Ankara

Poland: Europe Hears ‘Enough’ from the US: Clever Poles Refuse To Believe It

China: South Korea Must Reflect on America’s Untrustworthiness

Austria: Birthright Citizenship: They Won the Battle, but Not the War

United Arab Emirates: Were Trump’s Military Powers Revoked?

Related Articles

Italy: Resurrecting the Red Scare*

Luxembourg: Trump Doesn’t Care about the Rules, and Everyone Is Playing Along

Saudi Arabia: Could There Be a NATO Without the US?

Saudi Arabia: NATO’s Photo-Op in Ankara

United Arab Emirates: Were Trump’s Military Powers Revoked?