Facing Conflict Is the Only Way toward the Future

Published in Guangming Daily
(China) on 26 June 2019
by 林晓 (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Liza Roberts. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
Since the U.S. began clashing with China over economic and trade policies, the Chinese people have found strength in unity and self-confidence. They believe that managing their own situation well will be more than enough to let them realize their goals. Yet in online forums, there are still rumors that the trade war will bring about an inevitable loss for China; that the only way for China to survive is to surrender to the U.S.

Is the trade war really bringing about an inevitable loss for China? History is the best teacher. Since the establishment of New China, China has made great sacrifices for the sake of its ideals. Facing the flames of war on the shores of the Yalu River in 1949, in order to secure its surroundings, China fought hard and won partial peace for a few decades. This victory proved that the time in which Western invaders could seize eastern coastlines with only a few cannons was gone, never to return.

This year, in the face of nuclear blackmail from the U.S., China has not flinched and does not believe that survival depends on surrender. Instead, China relies on its 5,000-year history, leans on its own national strength, and has successfully built an atomic bomb, hydrogen bomb and artificial satellites as long-term safeguards of national security. Let’s take another look at the facts: In the case of the trade war, some Americans think the United States’ implementation of restrictive trade policies will lead to overwhelmingly positive results. But the reality is just the opposite. The United States’ hopes of a rapid victory in this trade war have already been destroyed, and the probability of the trade war lasting a long time has increased remarkably. The sound of wide-ranging international criticism of the U.S. echoes around the world.

Is the trade war really bringing about an inevitable loss for China? Let’s examine where China should have confidence in the clash with the U.S. The unavoidable truth is that the U.S. started and escalated the economic clash. The conflict has created noticeable short-term economic fluctuations in China, and the income of domestic production managers and some salespeople has been negatively impacted. These difficulties have increased economic pressure at lower levels. However, if we move away from the short-term economic fluctuations and look at the situation as a whole, we see a different situation and a different outcome.

First, the effects of the economic friction between China and the U.S. are manageable. In 2018, Chinese exports made up approximately 18.2% of the gross domestic product, but the importance of exports for the Chinese economy is gradually decreasing. Beginning this year, China’s economy is reaching a steadily improving state, meeting reasonable intervals approaching the most important economic targets.

Second, the trend of economic growth in China is unchanging. Even after the start of the trade war, the long-term trend of improvement in China’s economic development has not changed. The continued growth that supports the foundation and good conditions of the economy have not changed; the revisions to the economic structure have optimized the economic situation.

Third, China’s comprehensive superiority is clear. China has a population of 1.4 billion, a labor force of 900 million, some 170 million people that have received a higher education, and the world’s largest middle class, including more than 100 million market actors. China is the world’s No. 1 manufacturer, has an independent industrial and economic system, and is the only country in the world that meets all industrial classifications offered by the U.N. At present, China is able to withstand the risks of foreign influence because its model of consumer demand guides economic development. In 2018, the contribution rate of China’s domestic consumption to economic growth reached 108.6%. Of that, 76.2% was due to the contributions of consumer demand. Consumer demand has become the engine of economic improvement. In 2018, China was ranked second in the world for investments in research and development, and the innovation capabilities of China’s science and technology sector are increasing incessantly.

Fourth, China’s regulatory and control measures are effective. China maintains high-quality development, advancing supply-side structural reform. In response to this economic friction, there is adequate space for control in policies regarding public finance, currency, income, industry, science and technology, investment, etc.

Fifth, under the firm leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, the entire nation stands united as one. The clearly superior centralized power has been able to tackle important political matters even after the economic friction arose. The CCP can definitely respond to the challenge posed by the U.S., and see it as a path to opportunity.

China is already the world’s second largest economy, the biggest manufacturer, the biggest in material trade, the biggest country in the foreign-exchange reserves, and has substantially enhanced its national strength. These are all seen as huge development successes and are recognized worldwide. Should China express fear of America, bowing to those causing panic, or is it naive to ignore the power shift that has occurred between China and the U.S. over the last 100 years? It is naive to genuinely trust the false narrative that the U.S. is invincible, and sincerely believe China is fundamentally unable to respond to the U.S. trade war. Those spreading panic underestimate and misjudge China’s economic tenacity and political capabilities, and especially underestimate China’s determination to use its abilities to guard itself against what goes against its rights and interests.

In reality, the U.S. is not as untouchable as it imagines, and China is not as weak as the U.S. imagines. The Financial Times chief economics commentator Martin Wolf pointed out in an article that in the near future, the U.S.’s attempt to prevent China’s economic and technological rise is doomed to fail.
The negative influence of U.S. unilateralism, protectionism and bullying in the domestic and international arenas is becoming increasingly large. This influence is gradually becoming the strongest motivator behind diminishing the force of U.S. politics, and will eventually lead the U.S. to total isolation from the international community.

Every day, China continues to develop and grow in strength; it is not a lamb to be trampled on. Though some people in the U.S. attempt to take measures that bully China in order to suppress it and force China to submit to the United States, these are doomed and will be futile. They will do nothing but damage the interests of all parties, including the U.S.

China is not stirring up trouble, but it is also not afraid. Through the ages, Chinese people have not been afraid of empty threats, and have had the courage to dare to struggle and dare to win. While the U.S. government adopts a strategy of containment and suppression toward China, the Chinese nation has long since started down the path toward a great revival.


美国发起和升级对华经贸摩擦以来,中国人民众志成城、理性自信,相信只要把自己的事情办好,就一定能够实现自己的目标。然而,舆论场上也有极个别人发出杂音,称贸易战“打起来中国必然要输”“投降了还有可能生存”,恐美、认怂溢于言表。

  真的是打起来中国必然要输吗?历史是最好的教科书。新中国建立伊始,一张白纸,百废待兴,就是在这样困难的情况下,面对烧到鸭绿江边的战火,为了获得一个安全的周边环境,中国断然行动,“为有牺牲多壮志,敢教日月换新天”,赢得了局部周边几十年的和平。“西方侵略者几百年来只要在东方一个海岸线架起几尊大炮就可以霸占一个国家的时代一去不复返了。”当年面对美核讹诈,中国没有畏缩,更没有期望“投降了还有可能生存”,而是凭着“一万年也要搞出来”的志气,依靠自己的力量,成功制造“两弹一星”,为国家安全建立了长久保障。再看眼前的事实。在这场贸易战中,美国一些人认为,只要美国对华实施贸易限制措施,结果就会朝着有利于美国的方向“一边倒”。但事实正好与他们的判断相反,他们的贸易战“速胜”希望已经破灭,贸易战进入持久阶段的概率显著提升;而国际社会也广泛对美方发出批评之声。

  真的是打起来中国必然要输吗?不妨看看中国应对美方经贸摩擦的底气与实力到底何在。不必回避的是,美方发起和升级经贸摩擦,短期内的确对我国造成一定的经济波动,国内部分企业的生产经营和一些消费者的预期受到不利影响,增加了我经济下行压力。但是,如果我们跳出短期经济波动,不局限于一时之得失,以全局、长远和根本的眼光审时度势,就会看到不一样的形势,得出不一样的结论。

  第一,中美经贸摩擦对我影响总体可控。2018年,我国出口依存度仅为18.24%,出口对中国经济增长的影响在逐渐变小。今年以来,中国经济开局良好,主要经济指标保持在合理区间,稳中向好态势明显。第二,我国经济向好趋势不变。中美经贸摩擦发生以来,我国经济发展长期向好的基本面没有变,持续增长的良好支撑基础和条件没有变,经济结构调整优化的前景态势没有变。第三,我国综合优势明显。中国有近14亿人口、9亿劳动力、1.7亿受过高等教育和拥有技能的人才资源、全球最大的中等收入群体、1亿多户市场主体。中国作为世界第一制造业大国,拥有独立完整的工业体系和国民经济体系,是全世界唯一拥有联合国产业分类全部工业门类的国家。当前,内需主导型的经济发展模式成为中国抵御外贸风险的有力武器,2018年内需对经济增长贡献率达108.6%,其中最终消费贡献率达76.2%,消费已经成为拉动经济增长的主要引擎。2018年,中国研发投入全球排名第二,科技创新能力不断提高。第四,我调控手段充足。我们坚持高质量发展,推进供给侧结构性改革。应对经贸摩擦,我们在财政、货币、收入、产业、科技、投资等方面的政策,都存有充足的调控空间。第五,我们有中国共产党的坚强领导,集中力量办大事的政治优势将进一步凸显,经贸摩擦发生以来,全国人民团结一心、众志成城,一定能够妥善应对挑战、化挑战为机遇。

  中国已经是世界第二大经济体、制造业第一大国、货物贸易第一大国、外汇储备第一大国,综合国力大幅提高,巨大发展成就举世公认。发出恐美、认怂杂音者,要么是不明就里的幼稚病,对当前中美两国国力变化和世界百年未有之大变局缺乏清醒认识,真信了美国无往不胜的虚假神话,从心底认为中国根本无力应对美国的贸易战,要么是别有用心。这种杂音低估误判了中国的经济韧性和政治能力,更低估误判了中国捍卫自身正当权益的意志和决心。事实上,美国没有他们想象的那么无往不胜,中国也没有他们想象的那样弱小无力。《金融时报》首席经济评论员马丁·沃尔夫近期撰文指出,美国试图阻止中国经济和技术崛起注定会失败。美国单边主义、保护主义和贸易霸凌主义在国内国际形成不利影响越来越大,逐渐成为分化美国政治势力的重要力量,使美国在国际社会日益陷入道义孤立。中国是日益发展壮大的大国,不是任人宰割的羔羊,美国一些人试图以极限施压的霸凌手段来强压中国就范,注定徒劳无功,还会进一步损害包括美方在内的各方利益。

  中国不挑事、不惹事,但也不怕事,中国人民历来有着不怕鬼、不信邪、敢于斗争、敢于胜利的勇气。当前美国政府对中国的遏制打压,不过是中华民族伟大复兴进程中必须迈过的一道坎儿。我们不必妄自尊大,但更不要俯首认怂。狭路相逢勇者胜。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Topics

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Related Articles

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Australia: America’s Economic and Political Chaos Has Implications for Australia