The New Attack Against Human Rights

Published in Milenio
(Mexico) on 10 July 2019
by Carlos Puig (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Patricia Simoni. Edited by Arielle Eirienne.
Yesterday, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador once again said that he does not have much respect for the National Human Rights Commission,* which does not have "moral authority" because, according to him, "they kept silent" in the past. An example of that supposed silence is the case of the night of Iguala and the students of Ayotzinapa.** He said the commission seems hypocritical; this, after the unprecedented response of the Welfare Secretariat to the CNDH recommendation regarding the detention of children and, a month ago, López Obrador being the first president in almost 30 years not to attend the annual report of the commission.

Needless to say, this time, López Obrador does not have the data. Just read the CNDH’s research on Iguala or look at the record of hundreds of recommendations and investigations on multiple human rights violations.

The CNDH is one of those institutions that functions. And it functions well. But these are different times, bad for human rights and for the gains made in recent decades. And for the world.

In the United States, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has convened a commission with the goal of narrowing the U.S. perspective on the global promotion of human rights, with an adjustment that recognizes “natural law”: law in accord with the religious groups of a particular country.

Secretary Pompeo said, “I hope that the commission will revisit the most basic of questions: What does it mean to say or claim that something is, in fact, a human right? How do we know or how do we determine whether that claim, that this or that, is a human right? Is it true, and therefore, ought it to be honored? How can there be human rights, rights we possess not as privileges we are granted or even earn, but simply by virtue of our humanity belong to us? Is it, in fact, true, as our Declaration of Independence asserts, that as human beings, we - all of us, every member of our human family - are endowed by [our] Creator with certain inalienable rights?”

These are dark times for the defense of human rights.



*Translator’s note: The Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos (CNDH) is Mexico’s national human rights institution and is accredited by the United Nations with "A" status by the International Coordinating Committee of National Human Rights Institutions.

**Translator’s note: On September 26, 2014, 43 male students from the Ayotzinapa Rural Teachers' College were kidnapped and murdered in Iguala, Guerrero, Mexico. Suspects included municipal police and organized crime.


Ayer, el presidente Andrés Manuel López Obrador, volvió a decir que no le tiene mucho respeto a la Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos, que no tiene “autoridad moral” porque según él “guardaron silencio” en el pasado. Incluyó en ese supuesto silencio, por ejemplo, el caso de la noche de Iguala y los estudiantes de Ayotzinapa. Dijo que le parecía hipocresía. Esto, después de la inaudita respuesta de la Secretaría de Bienestar a la recomendación de la CNDH sobre el caso de las estancias infantiles o de que hace un mes López Obrador fuera el primer presidente en casi 30 años en no asistir al informe anual de la Comisión.

No sobra decir que López Obrador, en esta ocasión, no tiene los datos. Basta leer la investigación de la CNDH sobre Iguala o buscar en la página los cientos de recomendaciones e investigaciones sobre múltiples violaciones de derechos humanos.

La CNDH es de esas instituciones que sí funciona. Y muy bien. Pero son estos otros tiempos, malos para los derechos humanos y lo que se ha conquistado en las últimas décadas. Y lo son en el mundo.

En Estados Unidos, el secretario de Estado, Mike Pompeo, ha convocado una comisión con el fin de hacer más limitada la visión de aquel país en la promoción mundial de los derechos humanos y ajustarla a una que tenga que ver con “la ley natural”, es decir, la que tiene que ver con los grupos religiosos de aquel país.

Dijo el secretario Pompeo: “Espero que la comisión vuelva a las preguntas más básicas: ¿Qué significa decir o afirmar que algo es, de hecho, un derecho humano? ¿Cómo sabemos o cómo determinamos si esa afirmación de que esto o aquello es un derecho humano es cierta y, por lo tanto, debería ser respetada? ¿Cómo pueden existir derechos humanos, derechos que poseemos, no como privilegios que nos otorgan o incluso ganamos, sino que simplemente por virtud de nuestra humanidad nos pertenece? De hecho, ¿es cierto, como afirma nuestra Declaración de Independencia, que, como seres humanos, nosotros, todos nosotros, todos los miembros de nuestra familia humana, estamos dotados por nuestro creador de ciertos derechos inalienables?”

Son tiempos oscuros para la defensa de losde los derechos humanos. 

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Trump’s Threat of Violence against Allies Will Be Felt for a Long Time*

Australia: The ‘Striking’ Difference in How Trump and Xi Used Their Invisible Summit

Mexico: Comrade Trump

Iraq: US and Its Imagined Enemy

Australia: From Foes to ‘Great Friends’ in a Year — Has China’s Xi Jinping Tamed Donald Trump?

Topics

Japan: The ICC and US-Japan: The Missing Element in the Prime Minister’s Speech

Germany: Trump’s Threat of Violence against Allies Will Be Felt for a Long Time*

Cuba: The Plague’s Address

United Arab Emirates: US vs. US

Australia: China Is No Longer Playing by American Rules as Xi Jinping Looks to His Next Term

Australia: The Reserve Bank of Australia Has No Choice but To Hike Rates as US Currency Crown Slips

Ireland: Donald Trump Acts as Putin’s Puppet for Reasons Shrouded in Secrecy

Related Articles

Canada: While Canada Fights Trump, Mexico Is Preparing To Eat Our Lunch

Mexico: A Pat on the Back and a Kick in the Shins: The Relationship with the US

Mexico: Mexico: Neo-Coupism Is on the Horizon

Mexico: Why Support Cuba?

Mexico: Who Will Defend Us?