“Westlessness,” the theme of this year’s Munich Security Conference that came to a close yesterday, drew attention to the deep divisions between Europe and the United States. The presidents of Germany and France suggested that this decline was primarily due to unilateralism and American withdrawal, something that the U.S. secretary of state disputed, calling the decline “grossly exaggerated.”
So is it really a decline or simply a rough patch? All civilizations are mortal. It’s written into the course of history, and the West will not escape it. The climate crisis, an aging population, the self-destruction of the educational system, the excessive exploitation of our natural resources, deindustrialization, the identity void, the transformation of democracy into technocracy, the victory of materialist ideology … nothing objectively portends happier tomorrows. And the attitude of “every man for himself” will only accelerate the degeneration that has been announced.
At best, our civilization will manage to slow its decline, but only if it works as one and is united. This requires peaceful relations with our partners, but also a new stage in the European establishment. More than ever, Europe must be capable of defending itself alone and making itself heard on the international scene by weighing in against the dangers coming from the East under the guise of Islamism, but also by way of the return of Russia and the rising economic power of China, two nations in the hands of authoritarian powers. It is all the more urgent because Americans are in the process of reconsidering their relationship with the old continent. In short, the world’s software is changing at a fast pace. The West must lead and guide this change, otherwise it will precipitate its own decline.
« Le déclin de l’Occident », le thème retenu cette année par la conférence de Munich qui s’est clôturée hier, a mis en évidence les divergences profondes entre l’Europe et les États-Unis. Les présidents français et allemand ont estimé que cet affaiblissement était d’abord lié au repli et à l’unilatéralisme américain, ce qu’a vivement contesté, le chef de la diplomatie US, jugeant que cette décadence « était grandement exagérée ». Alors déclin ou simple mauvaise passe ? Toutes les civilisations sont mortelles. C’est inscrit dans la logique de l’histoire. Et l’Occident n’y échappera pas. La crise climatique, le vieillissement de la population, l’autodestruction du système scolaire, l’exploitation outrancière de nos ressources naturelles, la désindustrialisation, le vide identitaire, la transformation de la démocratie en technocratie, la victoire de l’idéologie matérialiste, rien ne plaide objectivement en faveur de lendemains rieurs. Et le chacun pour soi ne fera qu’accélérer cette dégénérescence annoncée. Au mieux, notre civilisation parviendra à ralentir son déclin, mais seulement si elle est solidaire et unie. Ce qui passe par des relations apaisées avec nos partenaires, mais aussi par une nouvelle étape de la construction européenne. Plus que jamais, l’Europe doit être capable de se défendre seule, et de se faire entendre sur la scène internationale pour peser contre les dangers qui viennent d’Orient : sous les traits de l’islamisme, mais aussi à travers le retour de la Russie et la montée en puissance économique de la Chine, deux nations placées aux mains de pouvoirs autoritaires. Une nécessité d’autant plus urgente que les Américains sont en train de reconsidérer leurs relations avec le vieux continent. Bref le logiciel de lecture du monde est en train de changer en mode accéléré. Et l’Occident se doit de conduire et d’accompagner ce changement sous peine de précipiter son déclin.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
[The Democrats] need to find a campaign issue which will resonate beyond their liberal-metropolitan heartlands before the midterm elections in the fall of 2026.
[T]he president failed to disclose that subsidies granted by his government — in connivance with the Republican Party — artificially maintain the viability of fossil fuels.
In [Weiss'] articles, she attacked the alleged excesses of the left, criticized the 2017 Women's March against Trump and described intersectionality as a new caste system.
In [Weiss'] articles, she attacked the alleged excesses of the left, criticized the 2017 Women's March against Trump and described intersectionality as a new caste system.
Machado’s Nobel Prize is even more significant in light of recent U.S. military actions near Venezuela...A Nobel Prize that rewards peace should be viewed as a warning against military overreach.
Contempt for him is so great that, in this country, Trump is conceded little, and his successes are ignored. One of them is the peace plan for the Gaza Strip.
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.