Biden’s Double Success in the Middle East

Published in El País
(Spain) on 27 Febuary 2021
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Aislinn Mackey. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
The president of the United States take appropriate action against Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Joe Biden, who became president a little over a month ago, has made two important decisions this week, both correct, in one of the most complex areas of the international scene, the Middle East. The CIA report linking Saudi Arabia's leader, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, to the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who was kidnapped, murdered and dismembered at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in 2018, is a remarkable warning about the importance the U.S. is going to accord to respect for human rights, regardless of how prominent its allies. Biden emphasized this idea in a telephone call with Saudi Arabia’s King Salman.

There is no doubt about the historical importance of the alliance between Washington and Riyadh, nor is there any question about the human rights violations committed by the Saudi regime. It is appropriate that the Biden administration take a step such as disclosing the involvement of high-ranking Saudi figures in the murder of a dissident. It is desirable now that this disclosure marks the beginning of a more demanding policy with respect to the desert kingdom in the matter of human rights.

The other important decision is Biden's first public military order for an air strike in Syria against infrastructure controlled by Iranian-backed militias operating in that country. As it happens, Biden chose the most moderate of the three military options on the table, which, on the one hand, sent a firm signal to Tehran and at the same time, tried not to disrupt the rapprochement with the Ayatollah regime in the effort to reactivate the nuclear treaty that blew up when Biden’s predecessor unilaterally abandoned the agreement in 2018. The president of the United States has thus demonstrated his acute knowledge of the diplomatic scene.

Both of Biden's decisions exude transparency; safeguarding alliances and preferring diplomatic channels does not mean one has to hesitate in responding or look the other way when faced with excessive situations.


Doble acierto de Biden en Oriente Próximo
El presidente de EE UU actúa adecuadamente frente a Irán y Arabia Saudí

Joe Biden, que asumió la presidencia de Estados Unidos hace poco más de un mes, ha tomado esta semana dos importantes decisiones —ambas acertadas— en una de las zonas más complejas del escenario internacional como es Oriente Próximo. La publicación por parte de la CIA de un informe que vincula al hombre fuerte de Arabia Saudí, el príncipe Mohamed bin Salmán, con el asesinato del periodista Jamal Khashoggi —secuestrado, asesinado y descuartizado en el consulado saudí de Estambul en 2018— es una notable advertencia sobre la importancia que EE UU va a otorgar al respeto de los derechos humanos independientemente de la importancia de sus socios. Biden subrayó este concepto en una conversación telefónica con el rey saudí.

No cabe duda de la histórica importancia de la alianza entre Washington y Riad, como tampoco son indudables las violaciones de derechos humanos por parte del régimen saudí. Resulta oportuno que la Administración de Biden dé un paso como es el de hacer pública la implicación de altas personalidades saudíes en el asesinato de un disidente. Lo deseable ahora es que este aviso sea el comienzo de una política más exigente al Reino del Desierto en materia de derechos humanos.

La otra decisión importante es la primera orden militar pública de Biden con un ataque aéreo en Siria contra infraestructuras controladas por milicias que actúan en aquel país con el respaldo de Irán. Según ha trascendido, Biden escogió la más moderada de las tres opciones militares que tenía sobre la mesa con lo que, por un lado, envía una señal de firmeza a Teherán y al mismo tiempo trata de no romper la aproximación con el régimen de los ayatolás para lograr la reactivación del tratado nuclear que saltó por los aires cuando su predecesor lo abandonó unilateralmente en 2018. El presidente de EE UU demuestra así un acertado conocimiento del tablero diplomático.

Ambas decisiones de Biden rezuman transparencia; salvaguardar las alianzas o preferir las salidas diplomáticas no significa titubear en la respuesta o mirar hacia otro lado ante los desmanes.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: We Could Have Just Ignored Trump’s ‘Lake America’ Trolling

Canada: It’s Not Worth a Trade War To Save Ontario’s Foreign-Owned Car Plants

South Africa: Young Africans Like Trump Even Though They Do Not Trust Him

HOLD FOR NMERI

United States of America: North Korea, China and Taiwan: What Game Is Trump Playing?

Spain: To the Barricades

Topics

Australia: As the Iran War Flares, Donald Trump Looks for an Exit To Ease Mounting Political Pain

Canada: Ignore Donald Trump’s Trolling, What He Does Next Should Concern Us

Canada: A Dumb and Dumber Trade War

United States of America: Post-Constitutionalism

India: Sanctions, Strikes, Stalemate: Trump Tightens the Noose, Iran Refuses To Blink

Saudi Arabia: Trump, Putin and Exiting the War

South Africa: US Social Security Shortfall Offers Warning for South Africa

Related Articles

Austria: Trump Is Holding the Iranian People Responsible for His Failure

Japan: Half a Year of the Iran War: US Should Take an Honest Look at Failure

Austria: No Victory for Iran, but a Severe Defeat for the US

Egypt: War and Negotiations

India: Trump’s ‘Economic D-Day’ for Iran: Whose Clock Runs Out First?