As Republicans in Congress continue to block U.S. aid, Ukraine may soon go under. Not even Europe can make up for U.S. funding.
Three things are needed to wage a war, as the Hapsburg general, Raimondo Montecuccoli, explained to his emperor in the 17th century: money, money, and more money. It’s a maxim that still applies today, particularly to Ukraine. For the last two years, the country has had to defend itself from an aggressor whose economic prowess may only be equivalent to that of Spain but that invests a substantial portion of its budget in weapons.
The U.S. in particular has kept Ukraine alive until now. In absolute terms, the United States has sent almost three times as much aid as Germany. But since Donald Trump’s lackies in Congress have been blocking further aid for the past several months, Ukraine is slowly but surely running out of weapons.
So, U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin didn’t bring much more than words of perseverance when he arrived at Ramstein Air Base in Germany on Tuesday for a meeting with other Ukraine supporters. He did not respond to a question about how Europe is supposed to quickly offset the United States’ lapse in funding. That is probably because there is no answer.
Vladimir Putin, meanwhile, is having a good laugh. Donald Trump’s supporters have proven to be his most valuable secret weapon. The longer they block aid to Ukraine, the better for Russia. Already, Kyiv barely has enough ammunition left to keep the Russians from advancing. This spring, Putin’s troops will probably go on the offensive again. And no one knows where they will stop. All the money that has flowed to Ukraine until now was for nothing.
Trumps Getreue sind Putins stärkste Geheimwaffe
Weil die Republikaner im Kongress weiterhin US-Hilfen blockieren, droht der Ukraine bald die Luft auszugehen. Das US-Geld kann auch Europa nicht kompensieren
Drei Dinge brauche es, um Krieg zu führen, erklärte der habsburgische Feldherr Montecuccoli im 17. Jahrhundert seinem Kaiser: Geld, Geld und noch mehr Geld. Ein Diktum, das bis heute gilt. Auch und vor allem für die Ukraine. Seit zwei Jahren muss das Land einen Aggressor abwehren, dessen Wirtschaftskraft zwar gerade einmal jener Spaniens entspricht, der dafür aber einen Gutteil seines Budgets in Waffen investiert.
Bisher haben vor allem die USA die Ukraine am Leben erhalten: In absoluten Zahlen hat das Land fast dreimal so viel Hilfe geschickt wie etwa Deutschland. Weil Donald Trumps Lakaien im Kongress aber seit Monaten weitere Hilfen blockieren, gehen der Ukraine langsam, aber sicher die Waffen aus.
Viel mehr als Durchhalteparolen hatte US-Verteidigungsminister Lloyd Austin daher auch nicht im Gepäck, als er am Dienstag beim Treffen der Unterstützer im deutschen Ramstein eintraf. Eine Antwort auf die Frage, wie Europa so schnell den Wegfall der USA kompensieren soll, blieb er schuldig. Vermutlich, weil es keine gibt.
Wladimir Putin lacht sich derweil ins Fäustchen. Trumps Getreue erweisen sich als seine wertvollste Geheimwaffe. Je länger sie blockieren, desto besser für Russland. Schon jetzt verfügt Kiew kaum mehr über genügend Munition, um den russischen Vormarsch aufzuhalten. Im Frühling dürften Putins Truppen erneut in die Offensive gehen. Und niemand weiß, wo sie stoppen. All das Geld, das bisher in die Ukraine geflossen ist, war dann umsonst. (Florian Niederndorfer, 19.3.2024)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.