Did Natural Medicine Kill Steve Jobs?

Published in El Mundo
(Spain) on 16 October 2011
by Pablo Pardo (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Arie Braizblot. Edited by Heidi Kaufmann.
Ramzi Amri, a physician from Harvard University, has proposed an idea, even though it is mere speculation: If Steve Jobs had accepted chemotherapy treatment and a possible surgical operation when his cancer was detected in October 2003, he could still be alive today.

Instead, he waited nine months while he tried to fight the illness through a diet plan.

Amri is clear when he writes, “a PERSONAL title, and this is my PERSONAL opinion,” given that no one knows the details of Jobs’ illness. But he has posted his analysis on Quora, a very popular website in Silicon Valley, an area south of San Francisco where the American technology industry is concentrated, including the headquarters of companies like Hewlett-Packard, Google, Yahoo!, eBay, Adobe, Oracle and, of course, Apple. And what he said is emphatic: “Jobs allegedly chose to undergo all sorts of alternative treatment options before opting for conventional medicine.” As a consequence, “it seems sound to assume that Mr. Jobs' choice for alternative medicine has eventually led to an unnecessarily early death.”

For Amri, Jobs had a very benign type of cancer. However, at the end of July 2004, when he yielded to the evidence and agreed to have his pancreas and spleen removed at Stanford University, the tumor had already spread dangerously.

According to the doctor, Jobs therefore committed another fatal error by “opt[ing] to dedicate his time to Apple as the disease progressed, instead of opting for chemotherapy or any other conventional treatment.”

The thesis has been tremendously controversial. On the one hand, Jobs was incredibly protective of his private life; therefore, it is difficult to know whether he used chemotherapy, especially during his two long sick leaves from Apple. On the other hand, Amri is not a recognized expert in pancreatic cancer, although he does have experience in pancreatic cancer treatment and in other types of malignant tumors. At the least, the analysis is a reminder of the importance of routine checks for the types of cancer that are easiest to diagnose (breast, prostate, colon …), among which pancreatic cancer is not found.


¿Mató la 'medicina natural' a Steve Jobs?

16 OCT 2011 16:44

Ramzi Amri, médico de la Universidad de Harvard, ha lanzado la idea, aunque se trata de una mera especulación: si Steve Jobs hubiera

aceptado un tratamiento de quimioterapia y una posible operación quirúrgica cuando su cáncer fue detectado, en octubre de 2003, acaso

estaría vivo ahora. En vez de eso, esperó nueve meses en los que trató de combatir la enfermedad por medio de una dieta.

Amri deja claro que escribe “a título PERSONAL y que ésta es mi opinión PERSONAL” (en mayúsculas en el original), dado que nadie sabe los

detalles de la enfermedad de Jobs. Pero ha colgado su análisis en Quora, una web muy popular en Silicon Valley, que es la zona al sur de San

Francisco donde se concentra la industria tecnológica de EEUU, con la sede de empresas como Hewlett-Packard, Google, Yahoo!, eBay,

Adobe, Oracle y, por supuesto, Apple. Y es rotundo: “Jobs presuntamente decidió seguir todo tipo de tratamientos antes de optar por la

medicina convencional”. Como consecuencia, “parece lógico asumir que la elección de la medicina alternativa le costó una muerte prematura”.

Para Amiri, Jobs tenía un tipo de cáncer extremadamente benigno. Pero, cuando a finales de julio de 2004 se rindió a la evidencia y accedió a

que le extirparan en páncreas y el bazo en la Universidad de Stanford, el tumor ya se había extendido peligrosamente.

Según el médico, Jobs cometió entonces otro error fatal: “Optó por dedicar su tiempo a Apple a medida que la enfermedad progresaba, en vez

de elegir quimioterapia u otros tratamientos convencionales”.

La tesis ha sido tremendamente controvertida. Por una parte, Jobs era increíblemente celoso de su vida privada, por lo que no es fácil saber si

también usó quimioterapia, sobre todo durante sus dos largas bajas por enfermedad de Apple. Por otra, Amri no es un experto reconocido en

cáncer de páncreas, aunque sí tiene experiencia en el tratamiento de éste y otros tipos de tumores malignos. En todo caso, el análisis queda

al menos como un recordatorio acerca de la importancia de llevar a cabo chequeos regulares en los tipos de cáncer más fáciles de diagnosticar

(mama, próstata, colon..), entre los cuales no se encuentra el de páncreas.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Topics

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?