A look into the Basic Law might be helpful. Article 16 says, “Persons persecuted on political grounds shall have the right of asylum.” The constitution then goes on to specify some conditions.
But the core statement remains. So the courts will check his activities — that is, if Snowden is actually serious about his German asylum application. Doubts about that are permitted.
Despite all the criticism of the conditions in America and the systematic devaluation of human rights driven by the U.S., for example in Guantanamo Bay prison, President Barack Obama is not really heading a dictatorship. In America there are plebiscites and local referendums.
But one thing is also sure: The U.S. is no longer a perfect democracy. The attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 are no excuse for spy actions of epoch proportions. At least in a moral sense, Snowden did the right thing. The problem is that Washington’s arm is too long.
Regardless of which country takes him in, he must constantly protect himself from attacks by U.S. intelligence agencies. Polls within the U.S. are asking the government in Washington if it might put an end to Snowden’s activities, with violence if necessary.
The debate that has flared up in Berlin as to whether or not the “whistleblower” can seek asylum in Germany is heavily colored by the election campaign. The fact remains that in Germany, courts decide how the constitution is interpreted. They do not offer complete protection.
A look into the Basic Law might be helpful. Article 16 says, “Persons persecuted on political grounds shall have the right of asylum.” The Constitution then goes on to specify some conditions.
But the core statement remains. So the courts will check his activities—that is, if Snowden is actually serious about his German asylum application. Doubts about that are permitted.
Because despite all the criticism of the conditions in America and the systematic devaluation of human rights driven by the U.S., for example in Guantanamo Bay Prison, President Barack Obama is not really heading a dictatorship. In America there are plebiscites and local referendums.
But one thing is also sure: The U.S. is no longer a perfect democracy. The attacks of September 11, 2001 are no excuse for spy actions of epic proportions. In a moral sense, at least, Snowden did the right thing. The problem is that Washington’s arm is too long.
Regardless of which country takes him in, he must constantly protect himself from attacks by U.S. intelligence agencies. Polls within the U.S. are asking if the government in Washington might put an end to Snowden’s activities, with violence if necessary.
The debate that has flared up in Berlin as to whether or not the “whistle blower” can seek asylum in Germany is heavily colored by the election campaign. The fact remains that in Germany, courts decide how the Constitution is interpreted. They do not offer complete protection.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
Even Jake Sullivan, former United States president Joe Biden’s national security adviser, said “the Washington Consensus is a promise that was not kept[.]”
Senator Ted Cruz's warning to the Christian establishment about the rise of antisemitism on the American Right applies equally to the Israeli establishment. This poison is spreading among young Christians who will form America's leadership in the next generation.
Even in the earlier "Deal of the Century," Benjamin Netanyahu steered Donald Trump toward a Bar-Ilan-style bear hug: first applying Israeli law to parts of the territories, and only afterward offering a "minus Arab state."
The two men—the older one from glitzy Manhattan, the younger upstart from fashionably upmarket Brooklyn—have built formidable fanbases by championing diametrically opposed visions of America.