Obama Should Be Consistent

Published in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
(Germany) on 15 April 2009
by Reinhard Müller (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by Patricia Simoni.
It’s obviously not an easy task for President Obama to shake off the legacy he inherited from George W. Bush. His administration has filed suit against a judicial order stating that prisoners held at the Bagram military installation in Afghanistan are entitled to a review of their incarceration by the American court system. The Department of Justice fears that the ruling could compromise military operations. In the case of prisoners of war, the civilian court system wouldn’t have jurisdiction in any event.

But the prisoners held at Bagram weren’t captured in Afghanistan; they were just brought there for interrogation. They are, like the prisoners held at Guantanamo (which Obama intends to close), prisoners of the global and unlimited war on terror. The usual rules of war may be difficult to apply to this conflict, but that shouldn’t be used to justify the systematic violation of basic liberties. Obama needs to be consistent.



In Bagram
Von Reinhard Müller
15 April 2009


So einfach ist es offenbar für den amerikanischen Präsidenten Obama nicht, das Erbe der Bush-Ära abzuschütteln. Seine Regierung hat sich jetzt gegen eine gerichtliche Entscheidung gewandt, nach der Gefangene auf dem amerikanischen Militärstützpunkt Bagram in Afghanistan eine Überprüfung ihrer Haft durch amerikanische Gerichte verlangen können. Das Justizministerium fürchtet, militärische Operationen könnten dadurch gefährdet werden. Handelte es sich um Kriegsgefangene, wären ordentliche Gerichte ohnehin nicht zuständig.

Doch wurden die in Bagram Inhaftierten gar nicht in Afghanistan aufgegriffen, sondern nur zu Verhören dorthin gebracht. Sie sind somit, wie die Insassen in Guantánamo (dieses Lager will Obama schließen), Gefangene im weltweiten und unbegrenzten „Krieg gegen den Terrorismus“. Dieser Konflikt lässt sich zwar mit den überkommenen Kriegsregeln nur schwer bewältigen. Er kann aber die systematische Verletzung grundlegender Freiheitsrechte nicht rechtfertigen. Obama sollte konsequent sein.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Topics

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Related Articles

Germany: Unfortunately, Reality Comes to Those Who Wait

Germany: A Software for Authoritarian Restructuring

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*

Germany: Can Donald Trump Be Convinced To Remain Engaged in Europe?

Germany: Friedrich Merz’s Visit to Trump Succeeded because It Didn’t Fail

Previous article
Next article