European parties that share similar ideologies may be flattered by U.S. attempts to woo them. But they should be aware that the U.S. government is motivated solely by its own interests.
It feels a bit like belated revenge for the fact that “Europe” would have preferred the Democrat Kamala Harris as U.S. president. As reported by Defense One, an allegedly longer version of the U.S. security strategy indicates that the U.S. government aims to support politically like-minded “parties, movements and … figures” in Europe. The document specifically identifies Austria, Hungary, Italy, and Poland as countries that the U.S. should “work more with … with the goal of pulling them away from the [European Union].”
It is reasonable to assume that in Austria, the term “like-minded” refers to the Freedom Party of Austria. For years, Donald Trump has been a role model and source of inspiration for the FPÖ, with the party having established strong ties with the MAGA movement, primarily through Harald Vilimsky, who often visits the U.S. Events like election parties and far-right conferences surely serve as venues for open debate about topics such as Islamification, excessive wokeness and onerous civil rights.
An Established Collaboration
In any case, close collaboration between patriotic movements and MAGA is nothing new, nor is the U.S. strategy of opting to make agreements with individual states rather than taking on the EU as a whole, which is at least economically powerful.
At first glance, all of this may seem advantageous for right-wing, anti-EU parties. Ultimately, however, they should soon wake up to the fact that the U.S. government’s interference in Europe is motivated solely by its own interests.
Für Trump ist die FPÖ Mittel zum Zweck
Dass die USA gleich gesinnte Parteien in Europa umwerben, mag denen schmeicheln. Sie müssen aber wissen, dass die US-Regierung nur ihre eigenen Interessen verfolgt.
Es fühlt sich ein wenig wie späte Rache dafür an, dass „Europa“ lieber die Demokratin Kamala Harris als US-Präsidentin gehabt hätte. In einer angeblichen längeren Fassung der US-Sicherheitsstrategie will nämlich laut „Defense One“ die US-Regierung in Europa „Parteien, Bewegungen und Persönlichkeiten“ unterstützen, die politisch gleich gesinnt sind. Konkret nennt das Papier Österreich, Ungarn, Italien und Polen, mit denen die USA „verstärkt zusammenarbeiten sollten, um sie aus der EU herauszulösen“.
Die Vermutung liegt nahe, dass mit „Gleichgesinnten“ in Österreich die FPÖ gemeint ist. Donald Trump ist für die Freiheitlichen seit Jahren Vorbild und Ideengeber, es bestehen hervorragende Kontakte zur MAGA-Bewegung, primär über Harald Vilimsky, der häufig die USA bereist. Auf Wahlpartys oder ultrarechten Konferenzen ließe sich sicher freimütig über Islamisierung, unzumutbare Wokeness oder lästige Bürgerrechte debattieren.
Bekannter Schulterschluss
Ein Schulterschluss zwischen patriotischen Bewegungen und der MAGA-Bewegung ist jedenfalls nichts Neues – auch nicht die US-Strategie, lieber mit Einzelstaaten Vereinbarungen zu treffen, als es sich mit der zumindest wirtschaftlich mächtigen EU als Ganzes anzulegen.
Das alles mag rechten, EU-feindlichen Parteien auf den ersten Blick ins Konzept passen. Letztlich sollten sie sich aber rechtzeitig bewusst machen, dass die US-Regierung allein ihre eigenen Interessen verfolgt, wenn sie sich in Europa einmischt.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
European autonomy - military, technological, economic, and financial - is beginning to take shape as Europe hedges against current and future fluctuations in [U.S.] policy.
Here was the American president, surrounded by an ultimately submissive team, deciding to go to war on gut feeling and with no visible concern for what it would mean beyond [U.S.] borders.
America’s Achilles’ heel is internal. If it loses this war, it will likely be because much of the media, politicians, and even some of Trump’s allies do not fully understand his policies.
Israel must reduce its military dependence on the United States as much as possible and deepen its technological, military and moral value in American eyes.
European autonomy - military, technological, economic, and financial - is beginning to take shape as Europe hedges against current and future fluctuations in [U.S.] policy.
The shift now underway is unlikely to take the form of a dramatic collapse of American power in the Gulf. It is more likely to be subtler and, for the region, more unsettling.
Here was the American president, surrounded by an ultimately submissive team, deciding to go to war on gut feeling and with no visible concern for what it would mean beyond [U.S.] borders.
America’s Achilles’ heel is internal. If it loses this war, it will likely be because much of the media, politicians, and even some of Trump’s allies do not fully understand his policies.
Israel must reduce its military dependence on the United States as much as possible and deepen its technological, military and moral value in American eyes.
European autonomy - military, technological, economic, and financial - is beginning to take shape as Europe hedges against current and future fluctuations in [U.S.] policy.