The tragic shootings in Arizona have apparently provoked a catharsis in the different strata of American society. For this reason, at least for now, the aggressive campaign by the Republican Party, especially the tea party and its media, against the Obama administration had been scaled down. In other words, this is the time for self-control, in order to avoid blame and ensure that everything goes back to normal as soon as possible, with the idea of continuing in the near future with a strategy that has produced great electoral results. Heaven forbid anybody sees this unfortunate event as a consequence, in part, of a political action model based on tension, insults and the disqualification of opponents. I see a lot of parallels between American politics and the reality of Spanish politics, though fortunately, weapons are not for sale in Spanish supermarkets.
A review of certain Spanish radio, newspaper and television mediums will demonstrate that I am not exaggerating. Through these radio and television waves and papers that we consider right-wing (from the center that the PP says they occupy to the extreme right), hatred, contempt and insults wrapped in patriotic paper — and, in some cases, Christian ethics — are handed out generously.
El trágico suceso de Arizona parece haber provocado una catarsis en los distintos estamentos de la sociedad americana. Por ello se aplican a moderar, por un tiempo al menos, la agresiva campaña que desde el bando republicano, especialmente desde el Tea Party y sus medios, se ha venido haciendo contra la Administración de Obama. Es decir, ahora toca moderarse para que no se les señale y la situación vuelva a la normalidad lo antes posible y ya más adelante seguir con esa estrategia que da tan buenos resultados electorales. No sea que a alguien se le ocurra ver ese desgraciado suceso como consecuencia, en parte, de un modelo de acción polÃtica basado en la crispación, el insulto y la descalificación del contrario.
The message is unmistakable: there are no absolute guarantees and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests of powerful states.
If this electoral gridlock [in domestic policy] does occur, it may well result in Trump — like several other reelected presidents of recent decades — increasingly turning to foreign policy.
What happened to this performing arts center is paradigmatic of how Trump’s second presidency ... [is] another front in a war ... to impose an autocratic regime led by a 21st century feudal lord outside of international law.