Cornerstone of US-China Relations Is Laid, Yet Stabilizing Pillar Is Still Needed

Published in The People's Daily
(China) on 24 June 2015
by Jia Xiu Dong (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Chase Coulson. Edited by Eva Langman.
On June 23 and June 24, the seventh round of the Strategic and Economic Dialogue between the U.S. and China took place in Washington, D.C. Concurrently, the sixth round of high-level cultural exchange talks also commenced. On the eve of the discussions, the fifth U.S.-China Strategic Security Dialogue also began. In preparation for the dialogues, a number of senior officials from the U.S have visited China in succession over the past several months. Acting as liaisons for the Chinese were three delegates: Vice Premier Wang Yang, Vice Premier Liu Yandong and State Council Member Yang Jiechi. In America, three noted publications respectively published popular articles, the focal point being (the authors’) hopes and opinions about the dialogues, exchanges and collaborations. Therefore, it is plain to see that both sides have placed tremendous value on this round of talks and the conclusions that can be drawn from the negotiations.

The predecessors of the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue were the Senior Dialogue and the Strategic Economic Dialogue. The first U.S.-China Strategic Dialogue was 10 years ago, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s second term. Two years later, the two sides began the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue. After the White House changed captains, the Obama administration instituted sweeping reforms of the Bush administration’s domestic and foreign policy; however, the administration did not abandon its predecessor’s strategic dialogue mechanism. On the contrary, it made the decision to upgrade and merge the two together into the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, and initiated the U.S.-China High-Level Consultation on People-to-People Exchange.

Through this process, due to working relationships, this author has experienced what it is like to stew over the preparations for these talks and to be on pins and needles when they actually begin. I have experienced firsthand the importance of the role the aforementioned dialogues play in the relations between our two countries. For a decade, Sino-American relations may have experienced a lot of bumps, but the mechanism for discussion has always remained consistent, and the topics have broadened, the discussions have deepened, and the gains have been more plentiful.

Something New Is in Store for U.S.-China Dialogues This Year

Firstly, this September, President Xi Jinping is going to make an official state visit, with the core task of this dialogue being to make preparations and pave the way for the talks. President Xi’s visit to America is a matter of paramount importance, as our two heads of state will once again have an open dialogue about strategic matters after the California meeting in 2013 and the 2014 Beijing Center talks in Yingtai. Through this round of dialogues, the two parties will likely reach a consensus in terms of important areas of cooperation — if the talks are to bear fruit and be surrounded by a positive, collaborative atmosphere.

Secondly, America is drawing gradually closer to election time, which is the background surrounding the next phase and cannot be avoided. This round of talks needs to make its own contribution to the stability of U.S.-China relations during election time. Over the past decade, during every election or midterm, U.S.-China relations have inevitably become bogged down by the rhetoric of elections, which often takes the form of publications by special interest groups in [the U.S.] that are trying to promote an agenda that implicates China in some way — which to a certain degree has had a negative impact on bilateral relations. Both sides should uphold the dialogues and do whatever it takes to avoid exerting pressure on the other through mudslinging in the media.

Thirdly, the dialogues are a source of new innovation that add new issues to the agenda, like a river’s torrents rushing out to sea, filling U.S.-China relations with new vitality. For example, both sides are going to open a dialogue specifically meant to address the issue of maritime security. The ocean belongs within the realm of new international territory. Both China and the U.S. are maritime powers, and America is actually a maritime superpower. For the past several years, China has put forth maritime strategies that will increase confidence and dispel suspicions through bilateral dialogues, and in the meantime ensure each nation’s oceanic interests, essentially making contributions toward the ethical protection of the sea for the benefit all of mankind. Both sides will conduct discussions about issues such as technology and innovation, green ports and shipping, as well as how to crack down on the illegal trade of wild animals and plant life.

Fourthly, advancing old issues to bring forth new developments will take both nations to new heights in vital areas of cooperation. For instance, a great consensus was reached on the issue of global warming. The heads of both nations published a joint declaration on climate change, thereby underscoring the fact that through these dialogues, it is quite possible to resolve thorny issues that have divided our two nations. Both states are considering how to strengthen their collaboration, and are striving to reach an agreement at the [United Nations] Climate Change Summit in Paris. Additionally, during the past several rounds of dialogues on issues like energy, investment and Asia-Pacific security, both countries have come to constructive agreement. This round of dialogues will serve to build new developments atop the already existing foundation, bringing about new benefits and new gains.

Of course, the central mission of the aforementioned dialogues is to negotiate and assure the direction of the development of U.S.-China relations. To guarantee the forging of [positive] trade relations, a cornerstone must be laid to stabilize the two countries’ trade, and to advance the search for an effective stabilizing pillar with which to correctly manage certain issues like bilateral estrangement and avoid the head-on conflicts that often occur when sailing through stormy seas. U.S.-China relations should be patterned after the old Chinese adage, which says, “When a melon ripens, it falls off the vine by itself;”meaning, all problems will work themselves out with time.


海外版望海楼:中美关系,有了“压舱石”,还需“定海针”

贾秀东
2015年06月24日03:26 来源:人民网-人民日报海外版


  6月23日至24日,第七轮中美战略与经济对话在美国华盛顿举行,第六轮中美人文交流高层磋商也同期举行,在此前夕还举行了第五次中美战略安全对话。过去几个月,美方多位高级官员相继访华,为本轮对话做准备。对话开幕之前,作为中方代表团的3位牵头人,汪洋副总理、刘延东副总理和杨洁篪国务委员在美国3家知名媒体分别发表署名文章,重点阐述对中美对话、交流与合作的看法和期待。由此,双方对本轮对话磋商的重视可见一斑。

  中美战略与经济对话的前身是中美战略对话以及中美战略经济对话。10年前,在小布什总统第二任期之初,首次中美战略对话举行;第二年,双方又开启了中美战略经济对话。白宫易主之后,奥巴马政府对布什政府的内外政策进行了大刀阔斧的改变,但中美双方不仅没有放弃上述战略性对话机制,反而决定将上述对话合并升格为中美战略与经济对话,并启动了中美人文交流高层磋商。

  在此过程中,由于工作关系,笔者亲历了多轮对话的酝酿、筹备和举行,体会到上述对话磋商对两国关系的重要意义。10年来,中美关系经历了不少磕磕碰碰,但这些对话磋商机制不仅从未中断,而且议题更加广泛,讨论更加深入,成果更加丰富。

  中美对话年年有,今年对话有不同。

  首先,今年9月,习近平主席将对美国进行国事访问,本轮对话的核心任务就是为此访做准备和铺垫。习近平访美是今年中美关系的头等大事,是继两国元首2013年加州庄园会晤和2014年北京瀛台夜话之后,又一次两国元首战略沟通。通过本轮对话,双方将有可能就重要领域合作形成一系列共识,为中美元首会晤提炼成果,并为元首会晤营造积极氛围。

  其次,美国逐渐进入大选季,这是下阶段中美关系绕不开的背景,本轮对话需要为中美关系平稳度过美国大选季做出贡献。过去10年,每逢美国大选和中期选举,中美关系问题都免不了进入选举议题,美国一些利益集团会拿涉华议题做文章,对中美关系或多或少会造成一些消极影响。双方应坚持对话,力避靠炒作向对方施压。

  第三,对话推陈出新,加入了一些新议题,这为中美关系的发展注入新活力。例如,双方将在战略对话框架下举行以“保护海洋”为主题的特别会议。海洋属于国际新疆域,中美都是海洋大国,而美国是海洋强国,中国近几年推出了海洋战略,两国通过对话,可以增信释疑,在确保各自国家海洋利益的同时,为人类保护海洋做出应有贡献。双方还将就科技与创新、绿色港口和船舶、打击野生动植物非法交易等议题进行磋商。

  第四,推动老议题取得新进展,使两国在重要领域的合作更上一层楼。比如,去年,中美在气候变化问题上取得重大共识,两国元首发表了气候变化联合声明,凸显两国完全可以通过对话解决双方存在巨大分歧的棘手问题。两国正在考虑如何进一步携手,为世界巴黎气候大会达成新协议而做出努力。此外,两国过去几轮对话在能源、投资、亚太安全等问题上达成过建设性共识,本轮对话要在过去进展的基础上,力争取得新成果。

  当然,上述对话、磋商的最大使命仍然是把握好中美关系发展大方向,确保两国在铸牢经贸“压舱石”基础上,进一步寻觅到有效管控分歧,避免狂风暴雨中“迎头相撞”的“定海针”,让中美建设新型大国关系“瓜熟蒂落”。

  (作者为本报特约评论员、中国国际问题研究院特聘研究员)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Horror Show in Oval Office at Meeting of Merz and Trump

Austria: Whether or Not the Tariffs Are Here to Stay, the Damage Has Already Been Done*

Poland: Donald Trump’s Delusions about South Africa

Japan: Will the Pressure on Harvard University Affect Overseas Students?

Topics

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Germany: Peace Report 2025: No Common Ground with Trump

Australia: America’s Economic and Political Chaos Has Implications for Australia

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Turmoil in Los Angeles: Key Test of Trump’s Power

Germany: Friedrich Merz’s Visit to Trump Succeeded because It Didn’t Fail

Russia: This Can’t Go On Forever*

Related Articles

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Australia: America’s Economic and Political Chaos Has Implications for Australia

Germany: Friedrich Merz’s Visit to Trump Succeeded because It Didn’t Fail

Australia: The US’s Biggest Export? Trump’s MAGA Mindset

Previous article
Next article