Who’s Afraid of China-Africa Cooperation?

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 5 December 2015
by Cui Shoujun (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Yuzhi Yang. Edited by Paul Lynch.
The rapid economic development of China has had an indelible impact on the China-Africa relationship in the 21st century. One obvious sign is the expanding economic and trade cooperation between the two areas. Trade volume has grown from $10 billion in 2000 to more than $220 billion in 2014, at a growth rate of 21 times. Chinese investment in Africa has also grown from $500 million in 2000 to more than $32 billion in 2014, which is a growth rate of 63 times. At the same time, the African economy has achieved continuous growth. In the past 10 years, growth of average GDP in the African region is at more than 5 percent, one of the fastest in the world. It can be said that China has become an important impetus in the growth and revitalization of the African economy.

Yet the huge gains achieved by the China-Africa relationship has also created panic among Western nations. Articles [that stipulate] “China is looting African resources” are frequently published, with writers claiming that China is committing “new imperialism” in Africa. While China has imported large amounts of petrolatum, minerals and original materials from Africa, [it has also] exported industrial products to Africa, which is common practice in international trading. China is only one of the buyers; it has never tried to monopolize African countries’ economic lifelines or control their political processes. In fact, “South-South cooperation” is the heart of China’s African policy, with equality and mutual benefit at the core.

In a fundamental way, China-Africa trading is no different from America-Africa and Europe-Africa trading. China is buying from the international market at a reasonable market rate; it has never tried to squeeze the prices with African countries. The quantities China imports from Africa are also not more than those by Europe and America. Take crude oil for example: According to data released in 2014 by the American Energy Research and Development Administration, the total amount of crude oil China imported from Sub-Saharan Africa is at 22 percent of the region’s total, while Europe imported 28 percent of the total. Due to impact from the shale gas revolution, America has increased its own supply of petroleum recently, but 13 percent of the crude oil from Sub-Saharan Africa was still exported to America. If one takes into account the oil-export quotas from Libya and Algeria in North Africa (more than 70 percent of their crude oil is sold to Europe), China actually imports less than 20 percent of crude oil from Africa.

In order to grow, Africa has looked to the West for the past 50 years with no success. The prescription the West gave Africa has repeatedly been the Washington Consensus; it has asked African countries to develop according to its standard and system. Africa has not benefited from it, but has instead fallen into severe political, economic and social crises. Now, Africa is looking to the East, using a system put in place via the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation in 2000, and putting the China-Africa relationship on the fast track.

Unlike the past, the three engines powering the quick development of the China-Africa relationship are trade, investment and infrastructure-building. Self-generated economic growth in Africa has far outshone its over-dependence on external Western aid. For the people of Africa, China-Africa cooperation has shown benefits in many areas, such as infrastructure-building, medical care, education, housing and more. The cooperative mechanism between the two regions has benefited African countries in physical and psychological ways. China’s success in Africa should make Western countries reflect and not conduct a moral critique.

The “new imperialism” theory the West has espoused reflects a defensive emotion, a demonstration of the passive mentality of the zero-sum game. Western media has not looked to Africa’s growth and development, but rather saw China as a political competitor in Africa. According to data released in 2015 from the Pew Research Center, more than 70 percent of Africans welcome Chinese investment, which shows that for Africa, China is not one of the feared “new imperialists,” but a new development opportunity.


进入新世纪以来,中国经济高速发展对中非关 系产生深远的影响,这种影响的突出表现之一就是经贸合作规模的不断扩大。中非贸易额从2000年的100多亿美元上升到2014年的2200多亿美元,增 长了21倍;中国对非投资存量从2000年的5亿美元上升到2014年的320多亿美元,增长了63倍。与此同时,非洲经济也获得了持续性的发展。在过去 十年,非洲地区的年均GDP增长率达到5%以上,成为全球增长最快的地区之一。可以说,中国已经成为非洲经济增长乃至非洲复兴的重要推动力。

  然而,中非关系取得的巨大成果也引起了西方国家的“恐慌”,类似“中国掠夺非洲资源”之类 的批评在西方媒体不绝于耳,说中国在非洲搞“新殖民主义”。中国固然从非洲进口了大量石油、矿产和原材料,并向非洲出口工业产品,但应看到这种贸易方式也 是国际贸易的常态之一。而且中国只是买家之一,中国从未谋求对非洲国家的经济命脉进行垄断、政治进程进行把控,恰恰相反,“南南合作”是中国非洲政策的核 心,平等互惠是中国非洲政策的要义。

  从本质上看,中非贸易的性质与美非、欧非贸易并无不同,中国是以合理的市场价格从国际市场上予以购买,并未对非洲国家进行“价格压榨”。从数量上看,中国从非洲进口资源的总量也并不比欧美更多。以原油为例,根据美国能源情报署2014年公布的数据,中国从撒哈拉以南非洲进口原油数量占到这些国家出口总量的22%,而欧洲从该地区进口原油数量则占28%。由于受到“页岩油气革命”的影响,美国石油自给度不断提高,但撒哈拉以南非洲国家13%的原油仍然出口到美国。如果再加上北非地区的石油出口国利比亚和阿尔及利亚(原油出口70%以上销往欧洲)的出口份额,中国从非洲进口原油的份额实际上低于20%。

  为谋求发展,非洲曾“向西”看了50年,但并不成功。西方给非洲开出的“药方”是千篇一律 的“华盛顿共识”,在提供金融援助的同时,要求接受援助的非洲国家按照西方的标准和制度发展。非洲并未因此受益,反而陷入了严重的政治、经济与社会危机。 于是非洲开始 “向东看”,依托2000年设立的“中非合作论坛”机制,中非关系驶入“快车道”。

  不同于以往,贸易、投资和基础设施建设是拉动中非关系快速发展的三大引擎,非洲自 发性的经济增长远胜于对西方外部援助的过度依赖。而且在老百姓层面上,中非合作让不少非洲国家在基建、医疗、教育、住房等诸多领域受益。中非之间的合作机 制让非洲国家从物质上和精神上都得到了实惠。中国在非洲的成功经验应当引起西方社会思考而不是道德批判。

  西方的“新殖民主义”论调,折射出来的是一种防御性情绪,是一种“零和竞争”消极 心态的体现。西方舆论的着眼点并不是非洲的增长与发展,而是从地缘政治对手的视角看待中国在非洲的地区存在。2015年美国皮尤研究中心调查数据显示,有 70%以上的非洲人对中国投资持欢迎态度。这表明,对非洲而言,中国并不是令人惧怕的“新殖民主义”,而是一种全新的发展机遇。(作者是中国人民大学国际 关系学院副教授、国家战略与发展研究院研究员)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Topics

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

Related Articles

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?