Anxious Moon Jae-in Visits US Bearing Gifts

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Fiona McAllister. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in is currently on a five-day visit to the United States. He chose the U.S. as the destination for his first visit since coming to power. South Korea, regardless of who is in power, always considers the U.S. to be its superior; the only difference between them is a matter of degree among different South Korean leaders.

Moon Jae-in could be anxious on this trip because his list of issues to discuss are different from those of Trump. With potentially totally different positions, it is not known whether or not it will be possible to obtain Trump’s understanding or approval during talks. Regarding whether or not he will be able to put his global strategy into effect relates to whether or not he can implement his plan to govern the country.

The two thorniest issues are the North Korean nuclear problem and the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system issue.

The North Korean nuclear problem is the focus this time. South Korea and the U.S. are of one mind on this: to pressure North Korea to renounce its nuclear weapons in order to make the peninsula nuclear-free. But South Korea and the United States’ methods of achieving this are not the same. Trump is not currently threatening military strikes, but instead of tightening the screws of sanctions, he is naturally demanding that South Korea play a bigger role in this situation. Moon Jae-in advocates using dialogue as well as sanctions, and places particular emphasis on talks. During an interview with American media, he has even said he would like to draw North Korea back to the negotiation table by the end of this year. One side wants to increase sanctions; the other has its eye on dialogue. Clearly, these two ways of thinking are heading in different directions. They are incompatible, and attention is not being paid where it is needed. What Moon Jae-in must do this time, I’m afraid, is to discover what Trump really means and look behind what he says. We will have to see how much Trump permits him to do this.

The White House has said that THAAD is not the main topic of discussion between the U.S. and South Korea, and this has allowed Moon Jae-in to breathe a sigh of relief. Trump is being completely unyielding regarding the stationing of THAAD in South Korea and has even threatened to withdraw U.S. troops from South Korea, while China and Russia unflinchingly oppose the stationing of THAAD in South Korea. Both sides are resolute, but neither side can afford to offend the other. Moon Jae-in is currently being equivocal. The decision to delay for a year on the grounds of an environmental impact assessment could be called the best alternative under the circumstances.

South Korean scholars believe that previous South Korean governments have handled U.S.-South Korean and Sino-South Korean relations according to the U.S.-South Korean alliance framework. Moon Jae-in seems to be leaning in the direction of treating South Korean-U.S. relations on a level equal to South Korean-China relations to achieve a dual-track system.

This, of course, is a rational choice. But if they do not send THAAD away, President Moon’s only real course of action will be to try to make Trump empathize with South Korea’s difficulties, and tell him that the fact is that half of South Korea’s population opposes the deployment of THAAD, state that it is hard to support THAAD because it will make enemies out of China and Russia, point out to him that THAAD will weaken South Korea’s superior status in Northeast Asian geopolitics, and that this is inconsistent with benefitting U.S. strategically, etc. There may not be the opportunity, or it may be inconvenient, to say this to Trump. Someday in the future, there will be open communication channels through which he will listen. At some point in the future, this could create the proper conditions and lay the groundwork to discuss the THAAD issue.

The trade deficit and the stationing of U.S. troops in South Korea at South Korea’s expense are the two main sources of friction in U.S.-South Korea bilateral relations. The U.S. is always a party in the trade deficit; demonstrating an upward trend last year, the trade deficit increased to $300 billion. South Korea has unexpectedly had to dig deep to pay the expenses of U.S. troops stationed there. On both these points, Trump has ripped off South Korea on more than one occasion, claiming that trade between the countries is unreasonable and needs to change and that he cannot tolerate South Korea wanting security from the U.S. without having to come up with the money for it.

Moon Jae-in knows that the leaders of foreign countries all want to meet with Trump, regardless of whether the meetings take place in the U.S. or whether they meet during Trump’s foreign visits. There must be enough repeated meetings and gifts, as is apparently already the custom. He also knows that issues that can be solved with money are not really considered issues. Moon Jae-in took many well known South Korean entrepreneurs with him on his visit to the U.S. and had prepared to deliver a considerable gift. According to South Korean media reports, Samsung Electronics Co., LG Electronics Co., Hyundai, SK Conglomerate, Doosan Corporation, CJ Group, etc., all announced, one after another, their plans to invest in the United States. The entrepreneurs are deciding about investing $12.8 billion in America in the next five years. These businesses are also preparing to spend $22.4 billion on U.S. gas supplies and aircraft, among other things.

Moon Jae-in has repeatedly emphasized his aim of establishing close relations with President Trump to increase mutual trust in one another and to strengthen the U.S.-South Korean alliance. In his opinion, both sides firmly trust one another, and the concrete issues are easy to handle. With this in mind, it seems likely he will achieve his goals on this visit to the United States.


文在寅带着厚礼心怀惴惴访美国

韩国总统文在寅正在对美国进行为时5天的访问。上任后首次出访选定美国,这符合出来混先得拜老大的江湖规则。韩国不论谁当政,都把美国奉为盟主,放在心目中最重要的位置,只是程度不同而已。
  文在寅此行可用“心怀惴惴”来形容,因为在会谈清单上列出的问题中,好些个他同特朗普看法不一,或立场迥异,而能否通过会谈得到特朗普的谅解与认可,事关他的地缘战略能不能推行,关乎其治国抱负能否得以施展。
  最棘手的问题有两个:朝核问题和萨德问题。
  朝鲜核问题是这次会谈的重点。韩美双方对此大方向一致,即压朝鲜弃核,实现半岛无核化。但达到目标的手段不同。特朗普近来虽然不再作“斩首”和“军事打击”的宣示,但对朝制裁的螺丝却越拧越紧。他自然要求韩国在其中发挥更大的作用。文在寅则主张对朝鲜制裁与对话两手并用,侧重对话。他在接受美国媒体采访时,甚至说要在今年年底前把朝鲜拉回到谈判桌。一方要加大制裁,一方着眼于对话,两种想法显然不对茬,难兼容,用俗话说是“尿不到一个壶里”。文在寅此番要做的,恐怕主要是探探特朗普的口风,看看他在多大程度上允许这么做,力争特朗普不发禁令,让他在这条路上走下去。
  白宫说,萨德不是美韩首脑会谈的主要议题,这让文在寅能多少松口气。特朗普对萨德在韩落地态度十分强硬,甚至以韩国不部署萨德美国就从韩国撤军相威胁,而中国与俄罗斯反对美国在韩萨德的立场坚定不移。两边都态度坚决,两边都得罪不起,眼下文在寅持模棱两可态度,以环评为由将这个问题的最后决断推迟一年,可谓是无可奈何的最佳选择。
  韩国学者认为,以往韩国历届政府对待韩美关系与韩中关系的思路,基本上都是在韩美同盟框架下处理韩中关系。文在寅政府则趋向于将韩美关系和韩中关系放在同等重要的位置上,实现双轨并行。
  这当然是理性的现实的选择。但要想不让萨德葬送自己上述构想,文总统唯一现实的作法是设法让特朗普体谅韩国的苦衷,给他介绍近半数的韩国民众反对部署萨德的事实,陈述因萨德同中俄交恶,是韩国难以承受之重,向他指出因萨德而恶化韩国在东北亚地缘政治优势,也不符合美国的亚洲战略利益,如此等等。这样的话这次可能没机会和不便跟特朗普讲,日后应通过各种渠道说给他听。这可以为有朝一日妥善处理萨德问题创造条件,埋下伏笔。
  在韩美双边关系中,主要磨擦是贸易逆差和驻韩美军费用分摊问题。美国一直是贸易逆差一方,去年逆差增加到300多亿美元,呈上升趋势。驻韩美军费用韩国不想多掏。对这两点,特朗普不止一次敲打韩国,声称两国贸易不合理现象必须改变,不能容忍韩国只想安全不想出保护费的现象继续存在。
  文在寅知道,外国领导人要见特朗普,不论是在美国还是在特朗普访问的国家,必须要送上足够重的见面礼,这似乎已成惯例。他同样明白,在特朗普那里,能用钱解决的问题就不算问题。文在寅这次访美带了个有众多韩国著名企业家在内的代表团,准备了一个很可观的“大礼包”。据韩媒报道,包括三星电子、LG电子、现代集团、SK集团、斗山集团、CJ集团等韩国大企业纷纷公布在美投资计划。这次随访的企业家决定在未来5年向美国投资128亿美元。除此之外,这些企业人士还准备未来5年拿出224亿美元从美国购买液化天然气和客机等。
  文在寅总统一再强调,他此行的目的主要是同特朗普总统建立私人关系,增强彼此的互信,鞏固韩美同盟关系。在他看来,双方有了牢固的信任关系,具体问题就容易处理。如此看来,他这次访问美国可以达到目的。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Topics

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Related Articles

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary