There Is Already Enough Interest Rate Clamor in United States Stock Markets

Published in Toyokeizai
(Japan) on 25 April 2022
by Haruyoshi Mabuchi (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Henry Anthonis. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
How Serious Are Concerns about Rising Interest Rates?

The United States stock markets, as before, see continued interest rate disturbance.

On April 21, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell participated in an event sponsored by the International Monetary Fund, where his remarks moved the market.

Powell, who said while part of that International Monetary Fund panel, "It is appropriate in my view to be moving a little more quickly," and "I also think there is something to be said for front-end loading any accommodation one thinks is appropriate.... I would say 50 basis points will be on the table for the May meeting," will attend the Federal Open Market Committee meeting on May 3-4. [https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/21/us-bonds-treasury-yields-climb-ahead-of-remarks-by-fed-chair-powell.html]

The Dow was down 368 points, or 1.0%, from the previous day, as concerns about a rapid rate hike were interpreted as bad news, with investors fearing that a little faster pace than 0.5% would be 0.75%.

Unexplained 981-Point Drop in the Dow on April 22

Although the market's performance on April 21 was understandable, on the next day the Dow fell as much as 981 points, or 2.8%, from the previous day. This decline was attributed to Powell's comments on Thursday. However, if this interpretation is correct, it cannot be explained that the decline on April 22 was much larger than that on April 21.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average slid only slightly to start April 22, while the NASDAQ Composite Index, which is said to be weak against a rise in interest rates, rose around the opening. If the market was concerned about Powell's remarks on April 21, it would have been strange if the stock price had not declined substantially from the beginning of the market on April 22.

Above all, in the bond market, the country's 10-year government bond yield fell slightly (0.008 points) from the previous day on April 22. No, it's not just 10 years. Bond yields have fallen slightly from the previous day for most maturities, excluding 30-year bonds, such as three-month, one-year and five-year. Concerns about rising interest rates, which will lower government bond yields, must be some kind of joke.

The correction in United States stock prices over the weekend was probably due to some large position adjustments ahead of the weekend. The index fell sharply after Netflix announced on April 19 that its membership had started to decline.

This may have caused investors to wonder whether the stock prices of other stocks that had been supported by growth expectations were really safe.

The Turmoil Is Likely To Continue in the Short Term, but Will Be Overcome in the Long Run

Investors are probably fed up with this interest rate frenzy, feeling that enough is enough. However, the market is in the business of making noise; in the short term, stock prices will continue to move up and down in a random manner, regardless of whether interest rates rise or fall, then force a rationale from the interest rate perspective onto the movement.

Therefore, it is essential to invest in a relaxed manner and be philosophical about the current bumpy situation. There is no use in regretting the situation.

However, from a long-term perspective, it is expected that the markets will gradually reduce their fluctuations over interest rate concerns. This is where some content is repeated from the previous column, as follows.

First, from November of last year to early March of this year, the rise in international commodity prices proceeded while the market was still not sufficiently confident about the economic and corporate profits. The Fed started tapering in November, and in December as the tapering accelerated, it began to suggest that interest rates will rise soon.

The market was dominated by the view that the Fed was rushing to reduce easing in order to respond to inflation, even though the economy and corporate profits were not particularly remarkable. For this reason, rising interest rates hurt stock prices.

Indeed, the price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil futures, which is an international indicator of crude oil, has been more than $130 per barrel since early March, with the Russian invasion of Ukraine. But now the price is stable at around $100 a barrel.

The strength of the employment situation in the United States was also a cause for concern at first, with investors focusing only on wage inflation. Now, however, interest is turning to the strength of retail sales as wage growth supports consumer spending. In United States stock markets, consumer spending related stocks such as Visa, Walmart, Home Depot and Procter & Gamble have also been attracting attention from time to time.

Thus, it goes from the situation that the economy and corporate profits are not good, but inflation is conspicuous, so the interest rate rises, to one where the interest rate rises because the economy is good, namely that investors are gradually moving to the view that the interest rate rises because corporate profits are good and so stocks can be bought even if interest rates rise. Short term stock market turmoil is likely to continue, but gradually United States stock prices will overcome rising interest rates.

Investors aren't the only ones tired of saying enough is enough. We have heard that Fed officials are also feeling bitter about the behavior of the market, which is either making too much noise or not making any noise at all about what they are saying.

Therefore, it appears that the Fed officials will continue to emphasize the message that the United States economy is still strong while reiterating to the market that the Fed will continue to reduce its easing and accelerate its tightening.

The Yen Depreciation Fiasco Reflects the Seriousness of Japan’s Long-Term Situation

Meanwhile, the yen has been weakening rapidly in the foreign exchange market, and there is talk that this may not be beneficial yen depreciation. The author believes that the yen has already weakened too much based on an analysis of the price and interest rate differentials between the United States and Japan (a detailed discussion of such an analysis here would be quite lengthy, so I will refrain from going into it).

A United States investor recently said, "The yen's depreciation will not stop because Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda does not raise interest rates. Meanwhile, I suspect that Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's administration is very worried about Kuroda's stance due to fears that small and medium sized companies in Japan might lose support for the government because they were hit by a surge in yen denominated energy prices. Therefore, I expect the dismissal of Kuroda before the election of the House of Councilors. What do you think?"

Most of the time, I have experienced that such a sudden inquiry was a turning point in the market, judging from investor sentiment.

I do not expect that the yen will continue to depreciate in the long run, but the market sentiment is likely to be influenced by speculative yen selling. Therefore, it is likely that Japanese stock markets will continue to be battered by the yen's slump.

Originally, whether the yen appreciates or depreciates, each has its own merits and demerits, and it is not always a singularly bad thing. However, it is understandable that when the yen depreciates against the rising dollar denominated prices of international commodities, as is currently the case, there is a concern that corporate profits will be squeezed due to higher costs.

As Japan's economy is weak and demand is fragile, there is also a headache in that when firms pass on the increase in costs through price increases, sales will fall dramatically.

However, this does not mean that there is an effective way to push the yen higher. Although Finance Minister Shunichi Suzuki and other officials have been making statements to restrain the yen from weakening, investors seem not to be holding their breath, believing that even if they intervene, they will not be able to do anything in practice.

Even if they were to betray those investors' expectations, intervene in the currency markets and possibly modify monetary easing, they would not be able to continue their yen buying intervention forever, nor would they be able to raise interest rates in Japan at a pace that would exceed the pace of interest rate hikes in the United States. It is unclear whether they will be able to push back speculative yen selling.

The Only Way To Stop the Yen’s Depreciation Is To Become a Country Worth Investing In

The best way to roll the yen back to a strong position is to make Japan a country worth investing in. Japanese companies would become more profitable, and people would want to invest in Japanese stocks; the Japanese economy would boom as Japanese companies become more prosperous, and interest rates would naturally rise, making people want to invest in loans and bonds in Japan; and the value of real estate would increase as the economy expands, making people want to invest in Japan, either through J-REITs or direct purchases of real estate. If this happens, the yen will then naturally appreciate.

The reason this does not happen is because of the failure of Japanese companies and the Japanese economy, not because of the currency market.

Japanese companies will not be helped by fretting over whether a weak or strong yen will be a problem. What is important is to aim for a corporate structure that will increase profits regardless of what happens to the yen.

It is not about financial techniques (e.g., corporate finance departments hedging aggressively with currency futures), but about creating products and services that are so attractive that people around the world will line up to buy them, no matter what the price is. It can be the development of a new product or service, or the improvement of an existing product or service.

For example, there are many people who advocate an easy idea that if the government proposes some kind of fiscal policy, the Japanese economy will improve at once. However, the source of creating added value in the economy is corporate activity, and if Japanese companies are unable or unwilling to boldly create value, it is useless to come up with any economic policy. In addition, if corporate management is in such a state, it will be difficult for Japanese stock prices and the yen to rise significantly in the future.

What the Japanese government and the Bank of Japan should do is to get out of the way of forward-looking companies (i.e., no unnecessary fiscal contraction or monetary tightening), revise domestic laws and regulations that hinder the growth of motivated companies and entrepreneurs, focus funds on areas that will improve people's lives (e.g., earthquake resistance, disaster prevention, defense, information technology, environment improvement, support for positive education and basic research), and lobby foreign governments to change regulations that are detrimental to Japan.


米国株式市場の「金利騒ぎ」はもうたくさんだ
「金利上昇への懸念」はどこまで深刻なのか?

アメリカの株式市場は、相変わらずの金利騒ぎを続けているように見える。

4月21日には、ジェローム・パウエルFRB(連邦準備制度理事会)議長が、IMF(国際通貨基金)主催のイベントに参加したが、そこでの発言が市場を動かした。

パウエル議長は5月3〜4日に開催されるFOMC(連邦公開市場委員会)において「通常の倍の0.5%の利上げを検討している」が、「私の考えではもう少し速いペースで動くことが適切だ」とも語った。

「0.5%より『もう少し速いペース』は0.75%だろう」と解釈されたことから、急速な利上げ懸念が悪材料とされ、この日のNY(ニューヨーク)ダウは前日比で368ドル(1.0%)下がった。

説明がつかない「22日NYダウの981ドル安」

21日の動きはまだ理解可能だとしても、翌22日のNYダウは前日比で981ドル(2.8%)もの大幅下落を演じた。この下落の説明も、パウエル議長の木曜日の発言によるものだとされている。しかし、そうした解釈が正しいとすれば、発言当日の21日より22日の下落がはるかに大きくなったことは説明できない。

また、22日の滑り出しは、NYダウが前日比でごく小幅にしか下げていなかったし、金利上昇に弱いとされているナスダック総合指数は、寄り付きあたりは前日比で上昇していた。21日のパウエル発言を22日も市場が懸念していたとすれば、22日の市場の始まりあたりからすでに株価が大きく下げ続けていなければおかしいはずだ。

それより何より、肝心の債券市場において、同国の10年国債利回りは22日に前日比で小幅(0.008ポイント)ながらも低下している。いや、10年だけではない。3カ月、1年、5年など、30年債を除くほとんどの年限で、債券利回りは前日比で小幅低下している。「国債利回りが低下する金利上昇懸念」というのは、おそらく何かの冗談に違いない。

やはり、こうした先週末にかけてのアメリカの株価調整は、週末を控えて何らかの大きなポジション調整があったことなどによるものだろう。個別には、ネットフリックス株が19日に「会員数が減少に転じた」と発表し、そこから株価が大幅に下げていた。

このため、ほかの成長期待に支えられてきた銘柄についても、株価は本当に大丈夫なのかとの懸念が投資家の間で抱かれた、という面もあったと推察する。

短期的に騒ぎは続きそうだが、長期的には克服へ

こうした金利騒ぎについて、投資家は「もうたくさんだ」と、うんざりしているだろう。ただ、市場は騒ぐのが「商売」という点もあり、今後も短期的には、金利が上がろうと下がろうと株価がでたらめに上下動し、それに無理やり金利面からの理屈を後付けする、ということが続くだろう。

したがって、当面はドタバタとした相場つきに陥ると達観し、ゆったりと投資することが肝要だと考える。嘆いても仕方がない。

ただ、長期的に展望すると、金利懸念がアメリカの株式市場を揺らすことが徐々に少なくなっていく流れだと見込んでいる。それは、前回の当コラムと内容がダブるところがあるが、次のとおりだ。

まず、昨年11月から今年3月上旬にかけては、市場がまだ十分に景気や企業収益の先行きに自信を抱いていない中、国際商品市況の上振ればかりが進行した。そうしたインフレ懸念を受けて、連銀は11月にテーパリング(量的緩和の縮小)を開始し、12月にはテーパリングの加速とともに、「近いうちの利上げ」を示唆し始めた。

そこで市場は「とくに経済や企業収益が目覚ましくもないのに、インフレに対応するため、連銀が緩和縮小を急いでいる」との見解に支配された。このため、金利上昇が株価の痛手となった。

確かに、3月上旬以降はロシアのウクライナ侵攻に伴い、原油の国際指標であるWTI原油先物価格が一時1バレル=130ドルを超えて肝を冷やした。だが現在は1バレル=100ドル前後でやや落ち着いている。

また、アメリカにおける雇用情勢の強さも、当初は賃金インフレばかりに投資家の目が集まって懸念要因となっていた。ところが今は、賃金の伸びが個人消費を支えるとして、小売売上高の堅調さに関心が向かうようになっている。アメリカの株式市場でも、ビザ、ウォルマート、ホーム・デポ、P&Gなど、個人消費関連銘柄が物色される局面も、時折ではあるが生じている。

こうして、「景気や企業収益がよくないのに、インフレばかりが目立つので金利を上げる」という状況から、「景気がよいから金利が上がるのだ」、すなわち「企業収益はよいのだから、金利が上がっても株式を買ってもよい」という方向へ徐々に投資家の見解が変化しつつあるのだろう。短期的な株式市況の動揺は続きそうだが、次第にアメリカの株価は金利上昇を克服していこう。

なお、「もうたくさんだ(Enough is enough)」とうんざりしているのは、投資家だけではない。連銀高官も、自分たちの発言を針小棒大に騒いだり、まったく騒がなかったりする、市場の振る舞いについて、苦々しく感じていると聞いている。

このため、今後の連銀高官の発言については、引き続き緩和縮小ないし引き締めの加速を繰り返し市場に織り込ませつつも、「それでもアメリカの景気の腰はしっかりしている」とのメッセージについても一段と強調することが検討されているようだ。

「円安騒ぎ」は長期的な日本の深刻さを映し出している

一方、為替市場でも円安が急速に進行し、これが「悪い円安」ではないかと話題になっている。筆者は、日米間の物価対比、金利差対比の分析では、すでにかなり円安が行きすぎていると考える(そうした分析を詳細にここで述べるとかなり長くなるので、割愛する)。

また、先日はあるアメリカの投資家から「日本銀行の黒田東彦総裁が頑固に金利を上げないため、円安が止まらない。一方、岸田政権は国内の中小企業が円建てエネルギー価格の高騰で打撃を受け、政権への支持を失いかねないと、黒田総裁の姿勢に苦虫をかみつぶしているのではないか。したがって、参議院選挙前にでも黒田総裁の更迭があると見込むが、どう思うか」との問い合わせを受けた。

大概、こうした突飛な問い合わせがある局面は、投資家心理から推し量ると相場の転機であった、との経験が多い。

このように、筆者は長期的に円安がどんどん進むとは予想していないが、投機的な円売りの仕掛けが入りやすい地合いではある。そのため、日本の株式市場が「円安騒ぎ」でドタバタすることは今後もあるだろう。

もともとは、為替が円高になろうと円安になろうと、それぞれメリットもデメリットもあり、一方的に悪いことばかりというわけではない。ただ、現状のように国際商品市況のドル建て価格が上がっているところに円安が乗ると、コスト高により企業収益が圧迫されるという不安が出ることは理解できる。

もともと日本経済の腰が弱く需要が脆弱なので、企業がコスト増を価格に転嫁すると売れ行きががグンと落ちるという点も、頭痛の種となっている。

ただし、だからといって、円高方向に押し込む有効な手があるとは考えにくい。足元では、鈴木俊一財務相などから円安を牽制する主旨の発言がなされているが、投資家は「口先介入しても、実際にはどうせ何もできないだろう」と高をくくっているようだ。

その投資家の見込みを裏切って、実弾介入や場合によっては金融緩和の修正を行ったとしても、円買い介入をずっと続けるわけにもいかないだろうし、アメリカの利上げペースを上回るような利上げを日本で行えるわけでもない。投機の円売りを押し戻せるかは不透明だ。

円安を止めるには「投資に値する国になる」しかない

では、どうすれば円高方向に巻き戻せるかといえば、日本が「投資に値する国」になればよい。日本企業が収益力を高め、日本株に投資したくなる、日本企業の隆盛により日本経済が盛り上がって自然体で金利が上がり、日本に融資や債券投資したくなる、また景気拡大により不動産の価値が向上してJ-REITもしくは不動産を直接買う形で、日本に投資したくなる、という状況になれば、自然に円高に向かうだろう。

そうならないのは、日本企業や日本経済がダメだからであって、為替市場が悪いからではない。

日本企業も「円安だと困る、円高でも困る」と頭を抱え、おろおろしても、何の足しにもならない。重要なのは、円相場がどうなろうと収益を増大させるような企業体質を目指すことだろう。

それは、財務面でのテクニック(例えば、企業の財務部が機敏に為替先物でヘッジする、など)によるものではなく、世界の人々が、価格がいくらであっても、列をなし買い求めるような、魅力ある製品やサービスを生み出すことだ。それは新規の製品やサービスの開発でもいいし、既存製品・サービスの改善でもいい。

例えば何かの財政政策を政府が打ち出すと、それで日本経済は一発改善、といったような、安易な考えを唱える向きも多い。しかし、経済で付加価値を創造する源泉は企業活動であり、日本企業が大胆な付加価値創造をできない、あるいはやる気がないのであれば、どのような経済政策を打ち出しても無駄だ。また、企業経営がそうした体たらくなら、日本の株価も円相場も今後大きく上がることは難しくなる。

日本政府や日銀がするべきことは、前向きな企業の邪魔をせず(いたずらな財政縮小や金融引き締めを行わず)、やる気がある企業や起業家の成長の邪魔になる国内の諸法令・諸規則を改正し、国民生活を向上させる分野(耐震化、防災、防衛、IT環境の整備、前向きな教育や基礎研究の支援など)に資金を集中し、諸外国の日本に不利な規制を外国の政府に働きかけて変更させる、ということだろう。

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Topics

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Related Articles

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

Israel: Trump Successfully Weakens the Dollar and Creates Danger for the US Economy

Afghanistan: Defeat? Strategic Withdrawal? Maneuver?

Austria: Trump’s Tariff Pause Isn’t Out of Good Will, He Is Fighting for Trust