Will the US and Russia Go from Cold War to Hot in 2023?

Published in Takungpao
(Hong Kong) on 29 December 2022
by Zhou Bajun (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Matthew McKay. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
As 2022 draws to a close, former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has again called for a truce between Russia and Ukraine, without which the world will be plunged into a major war. Kissinger advocated that the truce lines be drawn at the geographical coordinates of Feb. 24 – the date Putin launched his “special military operation” – and that during the negotiations between the two sides, Ukraine would be able to make its territorial and sovereignty claims over Donbas and Crimea. Such a proposal, very much in Ukraine’s favor, was nonetheless rejected by both Ukraine and Russia.

According to sources quoted by the U.S. press, the U.S. plans to approve the supply of Patriot anti-aircraft missile systems to Ukraine in the near future. The spokesman for the U.N. secretary-general stated publicly that what the U.N. wants to see is not a Ukraine that is the recipient of an increasing number of weapons, but one in which an early peace can take hold. This view is clearly unfavorable to the U.S. and the West, so it comes as no surprise that the West would insist on rejecting it.

In an interview with the media not long ago, Aleksandr Dugin, often referred to as “Putin’s brain,” publicly predicted the prospects of the Russia-Ukraine conflict: Either Russia will win or the world will be destroyed. Western scholars have put forward similar sentiments in the past, suggesting three possible scenarios: Either Russia will win; the stalemate will last; or Russia will lose. But if Russia were to lose, the U.S. and the West would be faced with a dire situation, implying the world would be plunged into nuclear war.

As we bid farewell to 2022 and enter 2023, it is hard to deny that humanity is headed toward the brink of a third world war. Despite the declassification of various files on the great power struggles of the second half of the 20th century, the superpowers have had the option to use nuclear weapons for more than half a century, ever since the U.S. dropped two atomic bombs on Japan. However, with the exception of the U.S. and the Soviet Union, both of whom shocked the world when they openly broached the prospect of nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis, there has been no cause for alarm over other uses of nuclear weapons, if only because they have been kept secret. The fact that the world is now actually witnessing the approach of nuclear war call for the utmost vigilance.

The Cuban Missile Crisis in the 1960s quickly abated because the U.S. and the Soviet Union were the only belligerents. The two countries found a way to compromise, though, and the crisis came to a natural end. However, in the current intensifying conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the U.S. and the West are determined to defeat Russia by supporting Ukraine, whereas during the Cuban Missile Crisis, neither the U.S. nor the Soviet Union had any intention of killing each other. The U.S. and the West are bound together with Ukraine, and it will not be easy to reach an agreement with Russia on a truce, let alone on peace.

The most recent example of the situation comes from French President Emmanuel Macron. Macron told French television station TF1 that he visited the U.S. and met with President Joe Biden to discuss the American and European need to prepare their “future security architecture” due to the situation in Ukraine. He also hinted that, in future negotiations to bring the Russia-Ukraine conflict to an end, Russia needed “security guarantees.”

Ukraine and other European countries have questioned Macron’s remarks. Ukraine reacted strongly, with Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, saying that it was the world that needed Russia’s security guarantees, and that Russia ought to be held accountable for providing them. The three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, as well as Poland and Slovakia, have also officially objected to Macron’s comments to the French government. In light of these events, France has been forced to reiterate its firm support for Ukraine.

Europe Facing Serious Security Challenges

With the U.S. and the West bent on wanting to bring Russia to its knees, an interview with former German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Die Zeit is further compelling evidence that the voices of reason must be silenced. In discussing the Russia-Ukraine issue, Merkel said that Germany and France had pushed for the 2014 Minsk Protocol in order to “buy time” for Ukraine to “build up its military strength,” and that “it was clear to everyone that the conflict was at a provisional stalemate. The problem has not been resolved,” she said, “but it gives Ukraine valuable time.”

Yet a few months ago, Merkel publicly stated that one should take Putin’s views seriously, and she repeatedly stressed that she had no regrets about having developed economic ties with Russia during her tenure as chancellor. Her latest comments therefore clearly cater to the intensely anti-Russian stance of the U.S. and the West, and it can be shown from this one aspect that the conflict between Russia and Ukraine will further escalate, bringing us closer to the precipice of a third world war.

Once again, the Russia-Ukraine conflict has shown that the main threat to world peace lies in Europe, because the nuclear powers have not entered into direct conflict in other geopolitical hotspots, such as the Middle East or the Korean Peninsula. So far, the U.S. has been pitting itself against Russia through indirect involvement in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but it is moving toward direct intervention. This is why the U.N. secretary-general’s office has made it clear that it does not want an increasing amount of weapons to be sent to Ukraine. If the U.S. ignores the call, it will be tantamount to blowing the lid off any pretense to indirect involvement.

During last century’s Cold War, the nuclear powers did not merely avoid conflict under the doctrine of “mutually assured destruction;" the division of powers established by World War II also prevented the superpowers from being at odds with each other. Today, the world is undergoing changes not seen in a century, with the center of gravity shifting from the West to the East. And the U.S. is not just resisting – it is threatening world peace with its words and deeds.


2023年美俄会由冷战变热战?

周八骏

2022-12-29 04:24:37

2022年即将结束的时候,美国前国务卿基辛格再次呼吁俄乌停战,否则世界将陷入大战。基辛格主张停战线划在2022年2月24日普京发起“特别军事行动”时的经纬度,乌克兰方面可以在双方谈判时提出关于顿巴斯和克里米亚的领土和主权申索。这样的提议倾向乌克兰,却不能为乌方所接受,更遭俄方拒绝。

对于美国媒体引述消息称,美国计划近期批准向乌克兰提供“爱国者”防空导弹系统。联合国秘书长发言人公开表示,联合国希望看到的不是越来越多的武器被运输至乌克兰,而是乌克兰早日实现和平。有关意见明显不利于美西方,为后者所坚拒是意料之中的。

不久前,有俄罗斯总统普京智囊之称的杜金接受媒体访问时对俄乌冲突前景公开发表预测——不是俄罗斯胜,便是世界毁灭。类似的观点,稍早时西方学者也提出过,他们提出三种可能的场景——或者俄罗斯胜,或者保持僵局,或者俄罗斯败;但若俄罗斯败,则美西方将面临可怕局面,亦即含蓄地表示,世界将陷入核大战。

不能不指出,人类在告别2022年、踏入2023年之际,正走向第三次世界大战的悬崖。尽管关于二十世纪下半叶大国争斗的各类档案解密显示,自美国在日本投掷两枚原子弹之后,过去逾半个世纪超级大国都有动用核武器的方案,但是,除美苏两国在古巴导弹危机时公开走近核战争边缘而令世人震惊外,其他都因为保密而没有惊动世人。必须十分警惕的,是当下世人目睹核大战一步步逼近。

上世纪六十年代的古巴导弹危机很快平息,是因为对立双方只是美国与苏联。两国找到妥协的下台阶,危机自然终止。但是,目前正在不断加剧的俄乌冲突,美西方支持乌克兰,决意打败俄罗斯,不同于古巴导弹危机时美苏双方皆无意置对方于死地。美西方与乌克兰捆绑一起,不容易达成与俄罗斯停战的协议,遑论谈和。

最近的事例是,法国总统马克龙早前接受法国电视一台(TF1)采访时表示,他访问美国时与总统拜登会晤,讨论了美欧为乌克兰局势准备“未来安全架构”的必要性,并且暗示,在未来结束俄乌冲突的谈判中,“俄罗斯需要得到安全保障”。

马克龙有关言论受到乌克兰及其他欧洲国家质疑。乌克兰作出强烈反应,乌克兰总统办公室顾问米哈伊洛.波多利亚克(Mykhailo Podolyak)称,是世界需要俄罗斯提供安全保障,俄罗斯应该对此负责。波罗的海三国爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛,以及波兰和斯洛伐克亦向法国政府正式表达对马克龙言论的反对。面对如斯局面,法方不得不重申对乌克兰的坚定支持。

欧洲面临严峻安全挑战

美西方笼罩必欲置俄罗斯于死地而后快的氛围,使理性的声音不得不消声的另一个有力佐证,是德国《时代周报》早前发表德国前总理默克尔的专访。在谈论俄乌问题时,默克尔称,德国和法国推动2014年明斯克协议谈判,是为了“争取时间”让乌克兰“增强军事力量”,“所有人都清楚,冲突已暂时冻结,问题还没有得到解决,但这给了乌克兰宝贵的时间”。

但在几个月前,默克尔却公开表示,应当重视普京的观点,一再强调她不会为其德国总理任内与俄罗斯发展经济联系而后悔。默克尔最新言论,显然是迎合美西方强烈的仇俄反俄立场。这从一个侧面证明,俄乌冲突将进一步升级而离第三次世界大战的悬崖更近。

俄乌冲突再次显示,世界和平的最主要危险区是欧洲。因为,其他地缘政治热点包括中东、朝鲜半岛等等,核大国没有直接冲突。俄乌冲突至今美国以间接参与方式同俄罗斯较量,但是,正趋于直接介入。故此,联合国秘书长发言人才表明不希望越来越多的武器被运输至乌克兰。如若美国无视呼吁,就等同撕破那幅间接参与的遮羞布。

上世纪“冷战”时期,核大国不仅因为“相互确保摧毁”而避免冲突,而且,二战确立的大国分据格局使超级大国不至于势不两立。如今,世界百年未有之大变局是世界重心由西方向东方转移,美国不单抗拒,其所作出的种种言行,更令世界和平面临威胁。

资深评论员、博士
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Germany: Trump’s False Impatience

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?