US China Strategy: Seeking Coexistence Despite Antagonism

Published in Tokyo Shimbun
(Japan) on 17 March 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dorothy Phoenix. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
How should China be dealt with? This challenge was the theme of a recent meeting of cabinet members between the U.S. and Japan. Even while there is antagonism toward China, we must not forget to strive for coexistence. Solidarity of liberal nations is also necessary for achieving this goal.

In a joint statement from the Japan-U.S. Security Consultative Committee security discussions (also known as a "two plus two"), foreign and defense cabinet members from the U.S. and Japan censured China, stating that the alliance is "committed to opposing coercion and destabilizing behavior toward others in the region, which undermines the rules-based international system."

After attending the two plus two in Japan, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin will visit South Korea. Just before this round of visits, the first Indo-Pacific region online summit meeting was held with the U.S., Japan, India and Australia, at the appeal of the U.S.

The aim of President Joe Biden's administration, which has demonstrated such rapid action, is to refine and coordinate a policy toward China with allies and friendly nations that share the values of democracy, human rights and rule of law.

In a joint statement from the leaders of the four nations at the Indo-Pacific region summit, the nations affirmed that they are "united in a shared vision for the free and open Indo-Pacific."

The Biden administration is positioning the framework of this so-called "Quad" of nations as the basis of its Indo-Pacific policy. On the other hand, India, which has traditionally been a "non-aligned" country, was concerned that the Quad would be interpreted as besieging China, and thus was hesitant about holding the summit. India's inclusion is thus significant.

However, rather than antagonism in the Indo-Pacific region, the ocean must be open to coexistence and mutual prosperity. No one profits from increased tension in Asia, which is at the center of world economic growth. The Quad must work to fulfill the role of ensuring stability in the region.

We hope to see the Biden administration emphasizing relationships with allies and coordinating its views with allied nations. This is not the time for the U.S., a significant national power, to forcibly coerce allies into cooperation. We would like for the nations to jointly refine a strategy toward China with a long-term perspective.

The unfolding power struggle between the U.S. and China in all fields, including trade, military and high tech, has been called the "New Cold War."

Biden views China as the "most serious competitor to the U.S."

At the same time, Biden has shown a cooperative stance toward China on global issues such as climate change and infectious disease.

We hope that the U.S. will strive to maintain the balance between "competition and cooperation."


米国の中国戦略 対抗しつつ共存を図れ

中国とどう向き合っていくのか。日米両国が開いた閣僚会議のテーマはこの難題だった。中国とは対抗しながらも共存を図ることを忘れてはならない。自由主義諸国の結束はそのためにも必要だ。

 日米の外務・防衛担当閣僚による安全保障協議委員会(2プラス2)は共同文書で、中国について「ルールに基づく国際体制を損なう、地域の他者に対する威圧や安定を損なう行動に反対する」と批判した。

 2プラス2に出席したブリンケン国務長官とオースティン国防長官は日本に続いて韓国を訪問する。この歴訪の直前には、米国の呼び掛けでインド太平洋地域の日米豪印四カ国による初の首脳会議がオンライン形式で行われた。

 こうした矢継ぎ早の動きを見せるバイデン米政権の狙いは、民主主義、人権、法の支配という価値観を共有する同盟国・友好国と、対中政策をすり合わせて足並みをそろえることである。

 日米豪印四カ国の首脳会議は共同声明で、四カ国が「自由で開かれたインド太平洋のための共通のビジョンの下で結束している」とうたった。

 この「クアッド」と呼ばれる四カ国の枠組みを、バイデン政権はインド太平洋政策の基盤と位置付ける。

 一方、伝統的に「非同盟」の立場のインドは、クアッドが「対中包囲網」と受け取られることを懸念し、首脳会議の開催を渋っていた。そのインドを引き込んだ意味は大きい。

 ただし、インド太平洋は対立よりも共存・共栄の大洋でなくてはならない。世界経済の成長センターであるアジアで緊張が高まることは誰の得にもならない。クアッドは地域の安定を担う役目を務めるべきだ。

 バイデン政権が同盟関係を重視し、同盟国と意見調整を重ねることを歓迎したい。ずぬけた国力の米国が同盟国を強引に付き従わせるような時代ではない。長期的視点に立った対中戦略を共に練り上げてほしい。

 通商、軍事、ハイテクなどあらゆる分野で繰り広げられる米中の覇権争いは「新冷戦」とも呼ばれる。バイデン大統領は中国を「最も重大な競争相手」と見なす。

 同時に気候変動、感染症という地球規模の問題では中国と協力していく姿勢も見せる。

 米国はこうした「競争と協力」のバランスを崩さぬよう心掛けてほしい。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Topics

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats