Yes, We Can't

Published in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
(Germany) on 03 May 2009
by Andreas Ross - Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Albert Minnick. Edited by Bridgette Blight.
Guantánamo

Commentary

As radical as it was, like he promised and like the world wanted to believe, Obama just cannot break with the Guantánamo policy of his predecessor. Just after taking office, he suspended Bush’s trademark proceedings before the military commission. But now the public is getting prepared for the fact that there probably will not be any special tribunals after all.

Even someone like Obama cannot take a political risk that, for example, one of the Sept. 11, 2001 conspirators would have an easy time before a civil court because he would make a claim of illegal conditions of imprisonment or even torture. The government will get to work on modifying the one legal mechanism the president refused to deal with during the campaign.

If Obama still likes to distance himself from Bush frequently and go on and apologize for America's mistakes to both friend and foe, he will have to use some of his political capital to pay for this change in position. European governments and the U.S. Congress may, in good conscience, reflect on this course of action, but that does not mean that they have to abandon a solidly united and principled solution to the problems these tribunals pose.


Guantánamo

Yes, We Can't

So radikal, wie er es versprochen und wie es die Welt so gern geglaubt hatte,
kann Obama mit der Guantánamo-Politik seines Vorgängers nicht brechen. Kurz nach Amtsantritt ließ er zwar die Verfahren vor den Militärkommissionen Marke Bush aussetzen. Doch jetzt wird die Öffentlichkeit darauf vorbereitet, dass es ganz ohne die Sondertribunale wohl doch nicht gehe.

Auch ein Obama kann politisch nicht riskieren, dass beispielsweise ein Attentäter vom 11. September 2001 vor einem Zivilgericht leichtes Spiel bekommt, weil er unrechtmäßige
Haftbedingungen oder gar Folter geltend macht. Also macht sich die Regierung daran, jenes Rechtswerk nur zu modifizieren, das der Präsident im Wahlkampf noch rundweg abgelehnt
hatte.

Mag sich Obama noch so oft von Bush distanzieren und bei Freund und Feind für Amerikas Fehler entschuldigen, kraft seines Amtes hat er sie auszubaden. An diese Verantwortung
dürfen die Europäer Regierung und Kongress in Washington guten Gewissens erinnern – was nicht heißt, dass sie sich einer solidarischen Problemlösung grundsätzlich verweigern
müssten.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Topics

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Related Articles

Germany: Unfortunately, Reality Comes to Those Who Wait

Germany: A Software for Authoritarian Restructuring

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*

Germany: Can Donald Trump Be Convinced To Remain Engaged in Europe?

Germany: Friedrich Merz’s Visit to Trump Succeeded because It Didn’t Fail