Yes, We Can't

Published in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
(Germany) on 03 May 2009
by Andreas Ross - Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Albert Minnick. Edited by Bridgette Blight.
Guantánamo

Commentary

As radical as it was, like he promised and like the world wanted to believe, Obama just cannot break with the Guantánamo policy of his predecessor. Just after taking office, he suspended Bush’s trademark proceedings before the military commission. But now the public is getting prepared for the fact that there probably will not be any special tribunals after all.

Even someone like Obama cannot take a political risk that, for example, one of the Sept. 11, 2001 conspirators would have an easy time before a civil court because he would make a claim of illegal conditions of imprisonment or even torture. The government will get to work on modifying the one legal mechanism the president refused to deal with during the campaign.

If Obama still likes to distance himself from Bush frequently and go on and apologize for America's mistakes to both friend and foe, he will have to use some of his political capital to pay for this change in position. European governments and the U.S. Congress may, in good conscience, reflect on this course of action, but that does not mean that they have to abandon a solidly united and principled solution to the problems these tribunals pose.


Guantánamo

Yes, We Can't

So radikal, wie er es versprochen und wie es die Welt so gern geglaubt hatte,
kann Obama mit der Guantánamo-Politik seines Vorgängers nicht brechen. Kurz nach Amtsantritt ließ er zwar die Verfahren vor den Militärkommissionen Marke Bush aussetzen. Doch jetzt wird die Öffentlichkeit darauf vorbereitet, dass es ganz ohne die Sondertribunale wohl doch nicht gehe.

Auch ein Obama kann politisch nicht riskieren, dass beispielsweise ein Attentäter vom 11. September 2001 vor einem Zivilgericht leichtes Spiel bekommt, weil er unrechtmäßige
Haftbedingungen oder gar Folter geltend macht. Also macht sich die Regierung daran, jenes Rechtswerk nur zu modifizieren, das der Präsident im Wahlkampf noch rundweg abgelehnt
hatte.

Mag sich Obama noch so oft von Bush distanzieren und bei Freund und Feind für Amerikas Fehler entschuldigen, kraft seines Amtes hat er sie auszubaden. An diese Verantwortung
dürfen die Europäer Regierung und Kongress in Washington guten Gewissens erinnern – was nicht heißt, dass sie sich einer solidarischen Problemlösung grundsätzlich verweigern
müssten.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Palestine: Peace: Rest in Peace

Saudi Arabia: Can Trump Really Ban the Muslim Brotherhood?

Saudi Arabia: A Moment in the ‘Oval Office’

Egypt: Palestine and Western Public Opinion – A Battle That Continues

Israel: It Is Time To Confront the Muslim Brotherhood

Topics

Saudi Arabia: A Moment in the ‘Oval Office’

India: Head-on | White Christian Nationalism Can Return America to Its Third World Roots

Mexico: Maduro Warns US: ‘They Will Never Be Able To Remove Us’

Egypt: Palestine and Western Public Opinion – A Battle That Continues

Argentina: Argentina-US Agreement: The Real Context

Israel: It Is Time To Confront the Muslim Brotherhood

South Africa: Why Nothing Will Stop Trump from Throwing Mud at SA

Saudi Arabia: Can Trump Really Ban the Muslim Brotherhood?

Related Articles

Germany: The Epstein Curse Continues To Loom Large

Germany: Donald Trump vs. James Comey: A Legal Vendetta

Germany: Unfortunately, Reality Comes to Those Who Wait

Germany: A Software for Authoritarian Restructuring

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*