The United States May Ease North Korea Policy

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 27 May 2009
by Wu Zhi Hao (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nicholas van Heyst. Edited by Louis Standish.
North Korea's announcement on the 25th of a second successful nuclear weapons test has attracted “Huanqiu”'s utmost attention. During an early morning interview, Shen Dingli, current vice-president of Fudan University's International Affairs Research Institute, indicated that North Korea's strategy may once again succeed in pushing the Obama administration into toning down its position on North Korea, and that Japan may use this as an opportunity to enhance its military or relax restrictions on its defense policy.

Shen Dingli stated that since the Lee Myung-bak administration came to power, policies concerning North Korea have experienced a major change. As a result, North Korea has been continuously critical of South Korea's substantial regression. Meanwhile, after a brief period of observation, North Korea has accused the Obama administration of being nearly identical to the Bush administration, and that it is very likely that they will overturn the policy to keep in contact with North Korea.

In this type of situation, North Korea believes that the threat to their nation’s safety from America and South Korea is becoming increasingly great, and therefore it is necessary to increase its nuclear deterrence capability in order to maintain security. Shen Dingli believes that the basic reason behind the North's nuclear test has resulted from a lack of trust between nations. “If there is not a change in the existing view on national security from all the countries involved, North Korea will definitely continue to conduct more nuclear tests up until they become a nuclear weapons nation.”

“In response to the actions made by the North Koreans, America is of course giving off the appearance that they are in staunch opposition,” Shen Dingli said, “but the United States government is very realistic; in their minds, they have already come to the understanding that North Korea, which has come to posses nuclear capability over night, will not be persuaded to willingly call it quits – unless North Korea experiences a change in leadership.”

Back at the time when the four-party talks mechanism was in place, there was an argument that North Korea was near collapse, but until now the six-party talks have been convening for several years and the North Korean state is, as before, still very stable. “You could therefore say that the United States is very clear that they have no choice but to gradually accept the reality that North Korea has nuclear weapons. And this nuclear test could very well increase the rate at which the Obama administration lightens up their policy on North Korea.”

Relative to the U.S., Japan's attitude might be much more unyielding, and one should not eliminate the possibility that Japan will use this as an opportunity to increase its military power or to amend its defense policy. A subordinate committee group of Japan's ruling party, the Liberal Democratic Party, recently suggested that the Japan Self-Defense Forces should have the capacity to launch a preemptive military attack against hostile military sites. And now in light of yet another North Korean nuclear test, this suggestion may receive a much greater response.

In addition, shortly after the second weapons test by the North Koreans, the Japanese government stated that they would request the United Nations Security Council to discuss new sanction resolutions on North Korea. After North Korea's first nuclear weapons test in October of 2006, the Security Council unanimously passed resolution number 1718 with regards to the issue of the North Korea’s nuclear weapons test, denouncing the country’s actions and demanding that they give up their plans for nuclear weapons and their nuclear program.

Shen Dingli believes that there is a good chance that the Security Council will pass a new resolution sanctioning North Korea, but it is difficult to say whether or not it will have any effect. “After resolution number 1718 appeared on the stage, North Korea absolutely did not experience any substantial blow.”

In comparison, the current world situation and that of 2006 have not seen any fundamental changes; therefore, North Korea will rest assured that even if the Security Council passes new sanction resolutions, they will still be unable to affect the pace of North Korea's development.



□晨报记者 吴志浩

  朝鲜25日宣布成功进行了第二次核试验,引起全球高度关注。复旦大学国际问题研究院常务副院长沈丁立就此接受晨报采访时表示,朝鲜的战略可能再次奏效,迫使美国奥巴马政府松动对朝立场。日本则有可能借机要求提高军力,或放宽防卫政策的有关限制。
沈丁立表示,韩国李明博政府上台以后,对朝政策发生了很大转变。朝鲜因此一直批评韩方大幅退步。同时,经过一段时间的观察,朝鲜又判断奥巴马政府与布什政府没什么不同,美国很可能再次推翻对朝接触政策。


  在这种情况下,朝鲜觉得美韩对其国家安全构成的威胁越来越大,有必要通过增强核威慑力来保证安全。沈丁立认为,朝鲜进行核试验的根本原因在于国家间的不信任。 “如果有关国家都不改变现有的国家安全观,朝鲜肯定还会进行更多的核试验,直到成为核武国家。 ”


  “对于朝鲜的这些举动,美国表面上当然坚决反对。 ”沈丁立说,“但美国政府是很现实的,他们心里早就断定,一旦朝鲜拥有了核能力,是无法说服其主动放弃的,除非朝鲜发生政权更迭。 ”

  早在朝核问题还是四方会谈机制时,就有论调说朝鲜即将崩溃,但直到六方会谈进行了多年,朝鲜政权依然稳固。 “所以说,美国很清楚,自己将不得不逐步接受朝鲜有核的现实。这次核试验,很可能加速奥巴马政府对朝政策的松动。 ”


  相对于美国,日本的态度则可能更加强硬,不排除日本借此机会加强军力或修改防卫政策。日本执政党自民党下属的一个委员会小组近日提议,日本自卫队应该拥有对敌方军事基地发动“先发制人”军事打击的能力。在朝鲜再次进行核试验的背景下,这一提议也许会得到更多响应。
另外,日本政府在朝鲜二次核试验后不久即表示,将要求联合国安理会讨论新的对朝制裁决议。朝鲜2006年10月进行第一次地下核试验后,安理会一致通过关于朝鲜核试验问题的第1718号决议,对朝鲜核试验表示谴责,要求朝方放弃核武器和核计划。


  沈丁立认为,安理会通过对朝新制裁决议的可能性较大,但制裁有没有效果就很难说了。“1718号决议出台后,朝鲜并没有受到实质性打击。 ”


  当前的国际形势与2006年相比,没有发生根本性改变,因此朝鲜会相信,即使安理会通过了新制裁决议,也仍然无法影响朝鲜发展的步伐。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Topics

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Related Articles

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem