Why Not Wei Jingsheng?

Published in The United Daily News
(Taiwan) on 10 October 2009
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Amy Przybyla. Edited by Jessica Boesl.
The unexpected winner has surprised most people. U.S. President Obama has received the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. Starting with the sound of surprise on site when of the list of nominees was publicly announced, this announcement was as if a super tsunami rapidly drew the entire world into an awkward situation in which one is unable to laugh or cry.

The typical reaction is to recognize that Obama is perhaps a very popular person, but does he actually have the qualifications to win the Nobel Peace Prize? Since being established in 1901, this may be the Nobel Prize's greatest controversy.

Not mentioning others, the worst part of this prize is that it rewards a person who has only had remarkable achievement in the preceding year. Yet, Obama assumed the office of the American president only nine months ago. Did the Nobel Prize committee count even his campaign as an “achievement”? The committee said the reasons Obama won the prize included “strengthening international communication” and “promoting cooperation between different ethnic groups.” Relying upon these words alone, which contain only vagueness and generalities, does this even count as Obama’s feat?

Obama's identity as the first African American president does indeed represent racial peace. But what led him to his status today is the U.S.'s democratic system and the voters. Therefore, today, the qualifications needed to obtain the Nobel Peace Prize are those of the 2008 U.S. presidential election, but not Obama himself.

Sometimes, the Nobel Peace Prize's list of names is quite stirring, including names like the International Campaign to Ban Landmines in 1997 and Muhammad Yunus for his “poor person bank” in 2006. These kinds of prize winners were not great people, but their achievements stirred people and moved their hearts. This year's peace prize unexpectedly hit this “audiences all ask why Obama" phase because the big name has brought big doubts.

Wei Jingsheng has continued to be unable to obtain the Nobel prize or have the committee look upon his name in favor. The committee members ought to think attentively about what happened 30 years ago. China had just ended Mao Zedong’s 30 year turmoil when a middle school graduate and inglorious electrician wrote “the Fifth Modernization.” Once more, his thoughts represented the voice of several billion common people (in what became the Wei Jingsheng speech). Although it is not accepted by the Chinese Communist Party, it is actually the real driving force behind China's current “reform and open door policy.”


為何不是魏京生?
大爆冷門、跌破眼鏡。美國總統歐巴馬獲得二○○九年諾貝爾和平獎,從名單公布現場的一陣驚訝聲開始,如超級海嘯一般迅速將整個世界捲入啼笑皆非。

典型的反應是:歐巴馬或許是個受歡迎的人,但他究竟有什麼資格獲得諾貝爾和平獎?這恐怕是諾貝爾獎自一九○一年成立以來的最大爭議。

不說別的,該獎的最消極條件,是獎勵在前一年相關領域中有卓越成就者。但歐巴馬就任美國總統僅九個月,諾貝爾獎難道連他競選的「成就」也計算在內。該委員會說,歐巴馬得獎的理由是「加強國際間的交流」、「促進不同族群間的合作」;就憑這幾句空泛的語言,就算是歐巴馬的功績了?

歐巴馬做為第一位非裔美國總統的身分,確實是種族和平的象徵;但造成他今日身分者,是美國的民主制度與選民,所以今天有資格得到諾貝爾和平獎者,應是美國二○○八年的那場總統大選,而不應是歐巴馬。

諾貝爾和平獎的名單,有時相當震撼人心;如一九九七年的國際反地雷組織,與二○○六年孟加拉尤努斯的「窮人銀行」。這類得獎者都不是大人物,卻皆有撼動人心的表現。今年的和平獎竟相中了這位「眾皆曰為什麼」的歐巴馬,反而因「大名字」帶來了大疑惑。

魏京生一直得不到諾貝爾獎的垂青。評審委員應當細讀三十幾年前,中國剛結束毛澤東三十年的動亂,那個中學畢業的無名電工所寫的「第五個現代化」,再想一想他所代表的數億平民的「呼聲」(魏京生語),雖不受中共容納,卻正是催促今日中國「改革開放」的真正動力!
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Peace Report 2025: No Common Ground with Trump

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Mexico: Big Tech and the Police State

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Turmoil in Los Angeles: Key Test of Trump’s Power

Topics

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Mexico: Big Tech and the Police State

Related Articles

Taiwan: 2 Terms Won’t Satisfy Trump

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Taiwan: A Brief Look at Trump’s Global Profit Grab

Taiwan: Taipei Must Act To Soften Trade Blows