Pollution in the Grand Canyon

Published in El Mundo
(Spain) on 15 January 2011
by Ricardo Gonzalez (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Drew Machowicz. Edited by Sam Carter.
Without doubt, one of the greatest wonders that the United States offers to its visitors is the Grand Canyon. Few landscapes in the world can match the beauty of this of this enormous gorge carved out over millions of years by the Colorado River.

Despite the cold winter temperatures, thousands of tourists flock each week to be able to observe its sharp cliffs and steep hills. Without doubt, the Grand Canyon presents its best face at dawn, when the rise of the sun highlights the red color of the mountains. For several minutes, the changing of the tone of light is constantly changing the colors of the landscape.

Although the thermometer drops to a morning low of -15 degrees Celsius, the famous spectacle of a sunset in the Grand Canyon is well worth a little pain and suffering. However, the day that I got up early, the entire canyon was covered in a dense fog, which blurred the colors of the landscape.

The day was clear, without a single cloud in the sky, and I imagined the fog was the product of the cold. However, I was mistaken. In the tourist center, a friendly park ranger informed us that it wasn’t a blanket of fog that covered the Grand Canyon but pollution, especially from the cities of Las Vegas, Los Angeles and Phoenix.

Curiously enough, the same day, the newspaper carried an article about the dispute around the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the United States. The agency intends to introduce limits on the emission of greenhouse gasses, but an alliance of Republican and Democratic representatives from states with large coal mines have conspired to prevent it. The debate regarding the EPA revolves mainly around climate change. Does it really exist? And if it exists, is it the cause of human action?

Looking across the stunning Grand Canyon, under a dirty smog, one wonders if the only argument for limiting greenhouse gas emissions really is the existence of climate change. It is a pity that pollution is ruining a landscape as captivating as the Grand Canyon, but even worse is the damage it does to our lungs.

Unfortunately, as our politicians do not seem interested in acting, it will be a question of continuing to refill our dear inhalers, currently the only way to avoid an asthma attack.


Flagstaff (Arizona).-Sin duda, una de las grandes maravillas que ofrece Estados Unidos a sus visitantes es el Gran Cañón del Colorado. Pocos paisajes en el mundo pueden igualar en belleza esta enorme garganta excavada durante millones de años por el río Colorado.

A pesar de las frías temperaturas invernales, miles de turistas acuden cada semana para poder observar sus escarpados montes y afilados acantilados. Sin duda, el Gran Cañón presenta su mejor cara en el alba, cuando el ascenso del Sol resalta el color rojizo de las montañas. Durante varios minutos, el cambio del tono de la luz va modificando constantemente los colores del paisaje.

Aunque el termómetro por la noche baja de los -15 C, el célebre espectáculo de un crepúsculo en el Gran Cañón bien vale la pena un poco de sufrimiento. Sin embargo, el día que me tocó madrugar para verlo, cubría todo el Cañón una densa neblina, que difuminaba los colores del paisaje.

El día era claro, sin una sola nube en el cielo, e imaginé que la niebla era producto del frío. No obstante, estaba equivocado. En el centro para los turistas, un amable guarda forestal nos informó que no era niebla el mantel que cubría el Gran Cañón, sino polución, proveniente sobre todo de las ciudades de Las Vegas, Los Angeles, y Phoenix.

Curiosamente, ese mismo día, el periódico llevaba un artículo sobre la disputa alrededor de la EPA, la agencia de control ambiental de EEUU. La agencia pretende introducir límites a la emisión de gases contaminantes, pero una alianza de republicanos y demócratas representantes de estados con importantes explotaciones de carbón se han conjurado para evitarlo. El debate respecto a la EPA gira sobre todo en torno al cambio climático. ¿Existe realmente? ¿Y si existe, es fruto de la acción del hombre?

Sentado frente el impresionante Gran Cañón, y bajo una asquerosa nube tóxica, uno se pregunta si, realmente, el único argumento para limitar la emisión de gases contaminantes es la existencia del cambio climático. Es una pena que la contaminación llegue a arruinar un paisaje tan arrebatador como el Gran Cañón, pero aún es peor el daño que hace a nuestros pulmones.

Por desgracia, como nuestros políticos no parecen demasiado interesados en actuar, será cuestión de continuar cargando siempre con el querido inhalador, de momento, el único capaz de evitar los ataques del asma.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Topics

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?