The U.S.-China Entente

Published in el Periodico
(Spain) on 23 January 2011
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Gabriel Floud. Edited by Hoishan Chan.
The visit by the President of China, Hu Jintao, to the United States has shown that friction in the relationship between the two great powers is not only inevitable but an inseparable part of the roles they play in the world order. Neither the tendency to avoid the Chinese regime’s lack of respect for human rights nor the insistence in underlining China’s strategic limitations neutralizes the ineludible fact that there is no mechanism capable of competing with a literally brutal* economic growth. That is how the President of the United States, Barack Obama, seems to have understood it when he didn’t hold back in his ideological criticism of China in Hu’s presence and accepted the challenge of drawing up a partnership, within which, in one way or another, the future of Taiwan, the conflict between both Koreas and, in general, all that pertains to Asia’s future will be affairs that require a joint administration by both powers.

Obama’s use of realism was necessary. The price of energy and raw materials, international commerce, the sovereign debt market, the investments in about 30 African countries and the moderation of the collective psychosis in the face of the challenge of global terrorism are chapters in which China is a determining player. The cool welcome which Congress gave to Hu is as understandable as it is unproductive: What is for sure is that for the first time since the end of the Cold War, the United States must share responsibilities on an equal footing; the tone cannot be the same one which was used with China when it was no more than a future promise.

*Translator’s note: The author used the word “brutal,” which presents a possible play on words with the word “extraordinary.”


La visita a Estados Unidos del presidente de China, Hu Jintao, ha certificado que los roces entre las dos grandes potencias son, más que inevitables, consustanciales con el papel que desempeñan en el orden internacional. Ni la tendencia a soslayar la falta de respeto del régimen chino por los derechos humanos ni la insistencia en subrayar las limitaciones estratégicas de China neutralizan el dato ineludible de que no hay mecanismo capaz de competir con un crecimiento económico literalmente brutal. Así lo ha entendido el presidente estadounidense, Barack Obama, al no ahorrar las críticas ideológicas en presencia de Hu y aceptar el reto de articular unas relaciones en las que, de una u otra forma, el futuro de Taiwán, el conflicto de las dos Coreas y, en general, cuanto atañe al futuro de Asia sean asuntos que requieran una gestión conjunta de ambas potencias.


Edición Impresa Versión en .PDF Información publicada en la página 6 de la sección de Opinión de la edición impresa del día 23 de enero de 2011 VER ARCHIVO (.PDF)
El ejercicio de realismo de Obama era necesario. El precio de la energía y de las materias primas, el comercio internacional, el mercado de la deuda soberana, las inversiones en una treintena de países africanos y la moderación de la psicosis colectiva ante el desafío del terrorismo global son capítulos en los que China es un actor determinante. La frialdad de la acogida dispensada por el Congreso a Hu es tan comprensible como estéril: lo cierto es que, por primera vez desde el final de la guerra fría, EEUU debe compartir responsabilidades en plano de igualdad; el tono no puede ser el mismo que el que empleaba con China cuando esta no era más que una promesa de futuro.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Tactically Right, Morally Clear

Saudi Arabia: Washington’s Smartest Move Is To Keep Israel out of the War

South Korea: Approving Saudi Uranium Enrichment and Imposing Tariffs: The US Hits a Nerve

South Africa: Saudi Arabia Signing ‘Abraham Accords’ Spells Doom for Palestinians

Nigeria: Trump’s Commendation, NSA and War Against Terror

Topics

India: The new Middle East Calculus: Trump’s Israel Condition Threatens US-Saudi Nuclear Deal

Egypt: Bibi Goes to Washington Again: This Time, Washington Sets the Terms

Nigeria: Trump’s Commendation, NSA and War Against Terror

South Korea: Approving Saudi Uranium Enrichment and Imposing Tariffs: The US Hits a Nerve

Poland: Trump Won’t Back Down in His Global Trade War

Japan: Argument for Dissolution of the ICC: The US Administration Is Wrongfully Exerting Pressure

Saudi Arabia: Washington’s Smartest Move Is To Keep Israel out of the War

South Africa: Saudi Arabia Signing ‘Abraham Accords’ Spells Doom for Palestinians

Related Articles

Saudi Arabia: Washington and Europe… A Rupture Confirmed by War

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides