In its relationship with the government of President Felipe Calderón, the administration of Barack Obama has been consistent in three positions from the start:
1. To recognize and applaud the efforts of the Mexican state and its leader in the fight against organized crime.
2. In discourse, admit that Washington is responsible for the growth of the phenomenon, but in practice provide very little help through the much-publicized Merida Initiative and do almost nothing to fix the lack of arms control.
3. To express their concerns, through formal or informal channels, about the delicate situation in the country and make it clear that, although the U.S. applauds the efforts of the Mexican government, these efforts are not sufficient.
While Barack Obama seeks to commend Felipe Calderón by comparing him to Elliot Ness, the Pentagon leaks that Mexico is a “failed state." While Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security for the United States, states that she is filled with confidence and trust for the Mexican Army, Navy, and the Attorney General, our neighbor’s military is concerned about the "narco-insurgency." Days after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared herself a “fan” of the Mexican president, the Under Secretary of the Army, Joseph Westphal, said that the traffickers would overthrow the federal government. In addition, he declared that the U.S. Army would have to send troops into Mexico soil (one day later, a government official distanced Obama’s government from such "personal" assessments and apologized for what was said. But the fact remains that what was said, was said.)
One does not even have to mention America’s distrust of the Mexican authorities exposed by WikiLeaks, or that this week Washington has arrived at a total of 14 citizen travel advisories to avoid travel or to exercise extra caution in 14 Mexican states.
A few days before the scandalous statement made by Under Secretary Westphal, Janet Napolitano made a speech directed at the Mexican criminal cartels, which warned them to not even think of bringing their violent methods into U.S. territory, because they would be fought against with all the State’s strength.
Just a few hours after Westphal's apology, Napolitano argued before the U.S. Congress that there is a large risk and possibility that terrorist organizations, like al-Qaida, could work with Mexican criminal groups such as Los Zetas.
The stick and the carrot. Again and again. The kiss and the slap. The Mexican government only manages to get indignant when they get the devastating diagnosis. Then they smile for the photo when they come knocking on the door with flowers.
En su relación con el gobierno del presidente Felipe Calderón, la administración de Barack Obama ha sido consistente en tres posturas desde el inicio:
1. Reconocer y aplaudir el esfuerzo del Estado mexicano y su primer mandatario en la lucha contra el crimen organizado.
2. Admitir en el discurso la parte de responsabilidad de Washington en el crecimiento del fenómeno, pero hacer casi nada en la realidad para enmendar la omisión en el control de armas y aportar muy poco en ayuda mediante la tan publicitada Iniciativa Mérida.
3. Expresar su preocupación, por vías oficiales u oficiosas, por la delicada situación que vive el país y dejar en claro que, pese a que aplaude los intentos del gobierno mexicano, éstos no son suficientes.
Cuando Barack Obama busca elogiar a Felipe Calderón al compararlo con Elliot Ness, el Pentágono filtra que México es un “Estado fallido”. Cuando Janet Napolitano, la secretaria de Seguridad Interna de Estados Unidos, estalla en confianza hacia el Ejército, la Marina, la PGR, los militares de nuestro vecino se preocupan por la “narco-insurgencia”. Días después de que Hillary Clinton se declarara fan del mandatario mexicano, el subsecretario de Defensa, Joseph Westphal, dice que los narcos van a derrocar al gobierno federal y en una de esas el USArmy tendría que enviar tropas a suelo de nuestro país (un día después, el funcionario deslindó al gobierno de Obama de sus apreciaciones “personales” y se disculpó por lo dicho, pero dicho estaba).
Ya ni mencionar las desconfianzas de la Unión Americana hacia las autoridades de México exhibidas por WikiLeaks, ni que Washington llegó esta semana a 14 alertas a sus ciudadanos para que eviten viajar o si lo hacen extremen precauciones en el mismo número de entidades de la República Mexicana.
Unos días antes de la escandalosa declaración del subsecretario Westphal, Janet Napolitano había pronunciado un discurso dirigido a los cárteles criminales mexicanos, en el que les advertía que ni siquiera pensaran en llevar sus métodos violentos hacia territorio estadunidense, porque serían combatidos con toda la fuerza del Estado hasta aplastarlos.
Apenas pasadas algunas horas desde la disculpa de Westphal, la misma Napolitano planteó ante el Congreso de su país que existe un riesgo enorme en la posibilidad de que organizaciones terroristas como Al Qaeda lleguen a aliarse con grupos criminales mexicanos como Los Zetas.
Un garrote y una zanahoria. Una y otra vez. La cachetada y el besito. El gobierno mexicano sólo atina a indignarse cuando llegan los diagnósticos devastadores y a sonreír para la foto cuando las flores tocan a la puerta.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,