America’s Disloyalty

Published in Exclesior
(Mexico) on 7 March 2011
by Alberto Begné Guerra (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Robin Salomon . Edited by Heidi Kaufmann.
[Attorney General] Eric Holder is deeply concerned that guns sold in his country could be used against his agents in Mexican territory. Once it was discovered that the 7.62 mm Draco that was used to kill Jaime Zapata was sold in Dallas, Holder said: “The concern I have is that with the increasing number of agents from the DEA, the ATF, and the FBI (in Mexico) these weapons (…) could be used against them, and that is a tragedy that I hope we can avoid.”* The audacity and the offense could not be greater: The thousands of Mexican lives slaughtered with the same weapons are not among his concerns. But the issue goes beyond insensitivity.

That the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives of the State Department** has launched the operation called “Fast and Furious,” opening the flow of high-caliber weapons to our country — as they explain now, to find their target, drug cartels, without informing the Mexican government and regardless of its terrible consequences — constitutes an unacceptable insult. The revelations of agent John Dodson from the ATF concerning this operation opened a sewer full of a murky policy and strategy that, moreover, confirms the perception that they have surrounding the Mexican government. It is not exorbitant to assume that Carlos Pascual’s viewpoints, later published in WikiLeaks, share a direct relationship with the design and implementation of this operation.

Today we are asked to consider the possibility that their agents carry weapons on our territory, a prerogative reserved for the armed forces and the Mexican police. This is an unacceptable request. It not only is contrary to the principles of the exclusive exercise of the security functions by the state, but also to the wise restrictions in effect in Mexico on the possession and use of firearms that, outside of the grounds of the barbarism of organized crime, we have learned to appreciate and is observed by the vast majority of Mexicans.

The bilateral relationship is going through a difficult time. It is not about avoiding our serious legal, institutional, social and ethical deficiencies, freeing the responsibility for our neighbors. It is about demanding respect to our constitutional system, as well as to the essential loyalty between two countries that, formally, maintain an alliance before a shared problem, the origins and growth of which could not be explained without the great demand of drugs by American consumers. In any case, we must continue to evaluate if the Mexican government’s strategy on drugs is relevant, not only for its high costs and limited results, but also because it has become clear that we don’t have an ally who, with respect and loyalty, actually recognizes and shares these efforts.

*Editor’s Note: This quote, accurately translated, could not be verified.
**Editor’s Note: The ATF is an organization within the U.S. Treasury Department.


Al procurador Eric Holder le preocupa mucho que las armas vendidas en su país sean utilizadas contra sus agentes en territorio mexicano. Una vez constatado que la Draco de 7.62 milímetros con la que asesinaron a Jaime Zapata fue vendida en Dallas, Holder declaró: “La preocupación que tengo es que con el creciente número de agentes de la DEA, de ATF y del FBI (en México) estas armas (…) sean usadas contra ellos, y esa es una tragedia que espero podamos evitar.” El descaro y la ofensa no podrían ser mayores: las miles de vidas mexicanas segadas con las mismas armas no figuran entre sus preocupaciones. Pero el asunto trasciende la insensibilidad.

Que la Oficina de Alcohol, Tabaco, Armas y Explosivos (ATF) del Departamento de Estado haya lanzado el operativo denominado “Fast and Furious”, abriendo el flujo de armas de alto calibre hacia nuestro país para, según explican ahora, dar con sus destinatarios, los cárteles de las drogas, sin haber informado al gobierno mexicano y sin reparar en sus terribles consecuencias, constituye un agravio inadmisible. Las revelaciones del agente John Dodson de la ATF sobre dicho operativo abrieron la cloaca de una política y una estrategia turbias que, además, confirman la percepción que tienen acerca del gobierno mexicano. No es desorbitado suponer que las opiniones de Carlos Pascual, más tarde publicadas en WikiLeaks, guarden una relación directa con la concepción y puesta en marcha de este operativo.

Hoy nos piden considerar la posibilidad de que sus agentes porten armas en nuestro territorio, prerrogativa reservada a las Fuerzas Armadas y las policías mexicanas. Es una petición inaceptable. No sólo contraviene los principios sobre el ejercicio exclusivo de las funciones de seguridad por parte del Estado, sino las atinadas restricciones vigentes en México sobre posesión y uso de armas de fuego que, fuera de los terrenos de la barbarie del crimen organizado, hemos sabido apreciar y observar la inmensa mayoría de los mexicanos.

La relación bilateral pasa por un momento difícil. No se trata de eludir nuestras graves deficiencias legales, institucionales, sociales y éticas descargando la responsabilidad en nuestros vecinos. Se trata de exigir respeto a nuestro ordenamiento constitucional, así como la lealtad imprescindible entre dos países que, formalmente, mantienen una alianza frente a un problema compartido, cuyos orígenes y crecimiento no se pueden explicar sin la gran demanda de drogas de los consumidores norteamericanos. En todo caso, debemos seguir valorando si la estrategia del gobierno mexicano contra el narco es pertinente, no sólo por sus altos costos y limitados resultados, sino también porque ha quedado claro que no tenemos un aliado que, con respeto y lealtad, realmente reconozca y comparta estos esfuerzos.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: As Southeast Asia Reels from Tariffs, Donald Trump’s Flashy ‘Peace’ Deal Falls Short

Colombia: The Global Game: China Advances, but the United States Still Sets the Pace

Austria: Trump Has Cut the Gordian Knot in Gaza, What Comes Next?

Canada: Canada’s Mysterious New Love for Ronald Reagan, Free Trade

Topics

Spain: I, Trump

Egypt: Trump’s Shifting Positions

Austria: Trump Has Cut the Gordian Knot in Gaza, What Comes Next?

Austria: In His Blunt Manner, Vance Comes to Netanyahu’s Aid

Japan: Antagonism with South America: Ship Attacks Go Too Far

Colombia: Everything Is ‘the Caribbean’

Colombia: The Global Game: China Advances, but the United States Still Sets the Pace

Related Articles

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Mexico: US Pushes for Submission

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Afghanistan: Defeat? Strategic Withdrawal? Maneuver?