Obama and Hillary Clinton Will Be Missed

Published in El País
(Spain) on 11 November 2016
by Joaquín Prieto (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jamie Agnew. Edited by Alex Mullin.
It is not unlikely that the day Barack Obama leaves the White House for the final time, unable to pass on the keys to Hillary Clinton, there will be a wave of nostalgia. Yesterday, having spent months attacking the Republican candidate's vulgarity and aggression, Obama received Donald Trump in the White House, putting on a brave face despite the knowledge that the result may mean all of his work as president has been in vain. In the wake of the election, Obama stated that the country needs “a sense of unity, a sense of inclusion, a respect for our institutions,” while at the same time urging Trump to unite and lead the American people.

Obama's personal image remains unaffected. The president's approval is way over 50 percent, and he has not been tainted by scandal during his time in office. However, this was ultimately not enough to convince sufficient numbers of voters to opt for Hillary Clinton, whose success would have cemented a presidential legacy forged in the face of Republican majorities in both houses.

Feeling even worse than Obama, however, will be Hillary Clinton, who has, once again, had to suffer the pain of not being able to “shatter that highest, hardest glass ceiling.” Despite this, the defeated candidate used her concession speech to urge her supporters to continue the fight, encouraging them to “keep doing [their] part to build that better, stronger, fairer America.” Given that Clinton received over half of the popular vote, the result has not been the complete rejection of her ideals, unlike what many have exaggeratedly claimed. However, this has not prevented her from accepting the result, from the necessity of moving on, or from the need to give Trump the chance to lead – a very different attitude to that of the new president-elect who, during the campaign, threatened to reject the election’s outcome if he did not emerge victorious.

Clinton and Obama have not limited themselves to the usual speeches about trust in the country's institutions, nor to a sort of sad exercise in civility in the face of a candidate who has played on the division in the country, which Clinton has now recognized as larger than she thought. Both are asking their supporters to remain alert and vigilant and to continue fighting for their rights while standing by the tradition of uniting behind the president-elect, despite the terrible attacks that previously emanated from his campaign.

Although none of this will help Clinton or Obama with their political careers, it does serve to feed the idea that leaders are responsible for the preservation of their country and the basic consensuses upon which their societies are built. It is for this reason that they cannot allow their followers to sink into despair in the face of what lays before them. In life you win or you lose, but you always defend the causes in which you believe. One defeat does not render null and void the ideals that each of us believe are worth democratically fighting for.


Echaremos de menos a Obama y a Hillary Clinton

No es improbable una oleada de nostalgia el día en que Barack Obama abandone la Casa Blanca sin posibilidad de dejarla en manos de Hillary Clinton. Ayer recibió a Donald Trump después de haberse pasado varios meses atacando la vulgaridad y la agresividad desplegadas por el candidato republicano. Obama se ha esforzado por poner buena cara a un triunfador que amenaza con dejar su trabajo en un mero paréntesis. Tras las elecciones dijo que su país necesita “unidad, inclusión, respeto a nuestras instituciones”, al tiempo que exhortó a Trump a “unir y liderar” a los estadounidenses.

Se le discute como político; su imagen personal sale intacta. La popularidad del presidente de Estados Unidos supera ahora largamente el 50% de opiniones favorables. Nunca se ha visto afectado por un escándalo. Esta buena imagen no le ha bastado para movilizar a suficientes electores a favor de la candidata Clinton, cuyo éxito le habría venido bien para mantener el legado de su presidencia, desarrollada en su mayor parte con mayorías contrarias en las cámaras parlamentarias.

Más afectada, Hillary Clinton hubo de reconocer el dolor que sentía por no haber sido capaz de romper “el más alto y el más duro de los techos de cristal”. A partir de ahí, todo el discurso de despedida de la aspirante derrotada sonó a reivindicación del derecho de los suyos a continuar el combate, animándoles a “seguir haciendo nuestra parte para construir una América mejor, más fuerte, más justa”. Con lógica, porque algo más de la mitad de los electores votaron por ella: esto no ha sido el “vuelco” total que muchos se empeñan en exagerar. Lo cual no le ha impedido reconocer el resultado, la necesidad de pasar página y la obligación de dar a Trump la oportunidad de liderar. Una actitud muy distinta a la del presidente electo, que durante la campaña amenazó con denunciar la legitimidad del resultado si él no salía triunfante.

Clinton y Obama no se han limitado a una expresión rutinaria de confianza en las instituciones, ni a un atristado ejercicio de civismo frente al principal sospechoso de haber excitado esa división que la candidata ha reconocido, tardíamente, más grande de lo que creía. Lo que ambos están pidiendo a sus seguidores es que permanezcan atentos y vigilantes, que sigan peleando por sus derechos. Al tiempo que mantienen la tradición de unirse tras el presidente electo, a pesar de los terribles ataques que se han dirigido durante la campaña.

Todo esto ya no les servirá a Clinton ni a Obama para sus carreras políticas. Sin embargo, alimenta la idea de que los líderes son responsables de la continuidad de la nación y de los consensos básicos, y por eso no pueden permitir la desmoralización de su campo frente a lo que se le viene encima. En la vida se gana o se pierde, pero se defienden las causas. Una derrota no invalida aquello por lo que cada uno cree que merece la pena luchar democráticamente.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Spain: Response to Trump Chaos

Egypt: The Role of Technology and AI in the US-Israeli War with Iran

Canada: As Trump’s America Steps Back, Xi’s China Moves In

Spain: The Danger of Political Violence

Poland: Polish PM Donald Tusk Questions US Loyalty in Financial Times, Targeting Both Parties

Topics

Venezuela: Neither State of the Union nor Commonwealth nor Bolivarian Republic: The Republic of Venezuela

     

Ireland: Don’t Ask Americans about News or Politics. They’re Done

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump’s Tariffs: EU/US Trade Deal under Pressure

South Africa: Trump’s Cantankerous Leadership a Bad Omen for World Peace

Egypt: The Role of Technology and AI in the US-Israeli War with Iran

United Arab Emirates: Did the War Create a Rift in Trump’s Party?

Germany: The Pentagon’s Internal War

Related Articles

Venezuela: Neither State of the Union nor Commonwealth nor Bolivarian Republic: The Republic of Venezuela

Ireland: Don’t Ask Americans about News or Politics. They’re Done

South Africa: Trump’s Cantankerous Leadership a Bad Omen for World Peace

Egypt: The Role of Technology and AI in the US-Israeli War with Iran