The abrupt dismissal – via Twitter – of Rex Tillerson from the State Department and his possible replacement by CIA Director Mike Pompeo is bad news. Not because Tillerson, former CEO of Exxon Mobil Corp., is a champion of the environment, but because, during his watch, United States diplomacy continued to play a relatively constructive role in international negotiations on climate change, in spite of the political hullabaloo that caused the U.S. exit from the Paris climate agreement. For example, at the most recent meeting of the parties in Bonn, the Washington representative did not start torpedoing the conference.
All of that could now change radically, which is something that Argentine diplomacy should follow closely, given its role as chair of the Group of 20 industrial and emerging-market nations. Pompeo is one of the most vocal climate change deniers in Washington. Before his promotion to spy chief, he was a U.S. representative from the district that included Wichita, Kansas, which – oh, what a coincidence – is the headquarters for Koch Industries, the largest money factory opposing climate change science. Pompeo was systematically financed by the Koch brothers; they are the candy men of North American democracy. Although Tillerson was a bad secretary of state (in fact, morale in his organization was poor), it can always be worse.
China’s Claws
China has just given teeth and claws to its Ministry of the Environment as a way of actively countering climate change and the resulting contamination of the rivers and air – the price it paid for becoming the world’s factory. It would be very helpful if the Asian giant would also address what Chinese companies do in other places. Here, for example, they are ready to sacrifice the Rio Santa Cruz with a bad and expensive project that contains very dark aspects in its conception and design. It is best to say and do the same thing everywhere.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.