The State of Democracy Today

Published in Le Journal de Québec
(Canada) on 14 December 2021
by Mathieu Bock-Côté (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Mollie Lippett. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
Joe Biden recently organized an international virtual summit on the future of democracy.

The agenda included global reflection on the future of a political regime that we thought would be forever triumphant after the fall of the Berlin Wall a little over 30 years ago.

Today, it is being challenged by great authoritarian powers such as China and Turkey.

Biden

We saw liberal democracy spreading throughout the world, as if every country had to convert to it. It was a dream. But just a pipe dream.

Today, it is again, in many respects, a peculiarity of Western society. We should have known better: Democracy requires a particular cultural and civilizational context in which to flourish. Democracy is not imposed by force or by bombs, as we have seen in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But we can also see today that democracy is weakened in the Western world. However, the picture is more complex as we see conflicting diagnoses for the crisis.

For some, democracy is threatened by what they call populism. An image of raging people, tempted by the tyranny of the majority's identity. For others, it is the opposite: Democracy is threatened by a government of judges and the omnipotence of "minority" lobbies that stifle the legitimate aspirations of the majority.

Crisis

Through all this, what are we to think of social networks that are transforming our way of debating, of the ideological fanaticism that is back in fashion, of censorship laws that are multiplying, of economic powers that no longer think on a national scale?

In short, the crisis is profound.

We simply don't know what we are talking about anymore when we speak about democracy. The first thing to do is to clarify the language, get beyond the confusion. It is really a question of mental clarity.


Joe Biden organisait ces derniers jours un sommet international virtuel sur l’avenir de la démocratie.

Au programme, une réflexion globale sur l’avenir d’un régime politique que l’on croyait pour de bon triomphant, après la chute du mur de Berlin, il y a un peu plus de 30 ans.

On le découvre aujourd’hui contesté par l’affirmation de grandes puissances autoritaires, comme la Chine ou la Turquie.

Biden

On voyait la démocratie libérale s’étendre à travers le monde, comme si chaque pays devait s’y convertir. C’était un rêve. Mais ce n’était qu’un beau rêve.

Aujourd’hui, elle redevient, à bien des égards, une particularité des sociétés occidentales. Il aurait fallu s’en douter : la démocratie exige un contexte culturel et civilisationnel particulier pour éclore. On ne l’impose pas par la force ou par les bombes, comme on l’a constaté en Irak et en Afghanistan.

Mais on constate aussi, aujourd’hui, que la démocratie est fragilisée dans le monde occidental. Le portrait est toutefois plus complexe, car les diagnostics sur cette crise s’entrechoquent.

Pour les uns, la démocratie serait menacée par ce qu’ils appellent le populisme. Ils s’imaginent un peuple rageur, tenté par la tyrannie identitaire de la majorité.

Pour les autres, c’est le contraire : la démocratie serait menacée par le gouvernement des juges et la toute-puissance des lobbies « minoritaires » qui étoufferaient les aspirations légitimes de la majorité.

Crise

À travers cela, que penser des réseaux sociaux qui transforment notre manière de débattre, du fanatisme idéologique qui revient à la mode, des lois de censure qui se multiplient, des puissances économiques qui ne se pensent plus à l’échelle nationale ?

Résumons : la crise est très profonde.

Nous ne savons tout simplement plus de quoi nous parlons lorsque nous parlons de démocratie. La première chose à faire consisterait à clarifier les termes. Pour sortir de la confusion. C’est une question d’hygiène mentale.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Lebanon: No Agreement on Islamabad Negotiations — Vance and Qalibaf Hold Firm on Red Lines

Saudi Arabia: A World without NATO… What Would It Look Like?

Canada: POTUS Versus the Pontiff

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump Versus the Pope: Leo Has the Advantage

Topics

Ireland: The Audacity of Newbie Catholic JD Vance Lecturing Pope Leo Is Breathtaking

Liberia: The Price of Dependence: What a Middle East Conflict Is Telling Liberia About Itself

Saudi Arabia: A World without NATO… What Would It Look Like?

India: The Gulf’s Borrowed Shelter: What the Iran War Is Really Exposing

Germany: Would a Trump Deal Be Better Than the Obama Deal?*

Luxembourg: Stories from the Grave

Australia: As Iran War Fallout Spreads, the Focus Shifts to Trump’s Mind — as It Should

Related Articles

Taiwan: A Global Democratic Reversal

Saudi Arabia: A World without NATO… What Would It Look Like?

Canada: POTUS Versus the Pontiff

Canada: Is It Normal for the US President To Spar with the Pope?