Migration: A Political Crisis?

Published in El Heraldo de México
(Mexico) on 9 June 2025
by José Carreño Figueras (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Stephen Routledge. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
But if Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is to be believed, the number of protesters was only a few hundred, and the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops was unjustified

The incidents involving migrants and immigration agents in Los Angeles have underscored the Trump administration's anti-immigrant campaign, and the mobilization of National Guard troops to control them has dramatized the situation of undocumented immigrants, legal residents and U.S. citizens of color.

But if Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is to be believed, the number of protesters was only a few hundred, and the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops was unjustified.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, for his part, said that “the federal government is taking control of the California National Guard and has deployed 2,000 troops to Los Angeles, not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a show.”* He then asked that “they not be given one.”*

Nonetheless, conditions are ripe for a “show.”

Judging by appearances, some in President Donald Trump's administration are eager for images of U.S. soldiers confronting the “invading enemy,” although, according to its critics, most of those invaders are taking care of gardens, cooking, waiting tables, cleaning houses and offices, or harvesting crops.

However, the dozens, or hundreds, of people who demonstrated Saturday night around the Los Angeles Federal Detention Center allowed Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House and a well-known anti-immigrant figure, to send a tweet alleging “insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States.”
The situation gives new substance to concerns about authoritarianism and xenophobia.

Above all, it raises the possibility of violence. The National Guard is not a police force but a military force.

For starters, this is the first time since 1965 that National Guard troops have been mobilized without a request from the state government. At that time, then-President Lyndon B. Johnson used them to enforce racial integration in Alabama.

In this context, expressions of discontent over the deployment of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement border police, which seems to have “free rein” to fill a quota of deportations by any means necessary, have highlighted what some see as a growing sign of authoritarianism and others as a decision to “take back” the country.

Reports, not only of raids in which U.S. citizens of Latin American origin are detained and even injured, but also of abuses of authority against foreign tourists including Europeans, do not help the international image, but they do help Trump and his allies' domestic audience.

The use of the militia reflects the Trump administration's decision to use emergency laws to confront what the radical right — including racist groups — has defined for years as the “invasion” of the United States.

Will the National Guard have “free rein”?

*Editor's note: These quotes, accurately translated, could not be independently verified.


Pero de creer a la alcaldesa de Los Angeles, Karen Baas, el número de manifestantes fue de apenas unos cientos y el despliegue de dos mil elementos de la Guardia Nacional es injustificado

Los incidentes protagonizados por migrantes y agentes migratorios ocurridos en Los Angeles subrayaron la campaña antimigrante del gobierno de Donald Trump y la movilización de tropas de la Guardia Nacional para dominarlos dramatizó la situación de indocumentados, residentes legales y ciudadanos estadounidenses de color.

Pero de creer a la alcaldesa de Los Angeles, Karen Baas, el número de manifestantes fue de apenas unos cientos y el despliegue de dos mil elementos de la Guardia Nacional es injustificado.

El gobernador Gavin Newsom, por su parte, señaló que "el gobierno federal está tomando el control de la Guardia Nacional de California y han desplegado 2 mil soldados en Los Ángeles, no porque haya escasez de fuerzas del orden, sino porque quieren un espectáculo". Y pidió luego "no les den uno".

Pero las condiciones están dadas para que haya un "espectáculo".

A juzgar por las apariencias, algunos en el gobierno del presidente Trump están ansiosos por imágenes en que soldados estadounidenses hagan frente al "enemigo invasor", si bien según sus críticos la mayoría de esos invasores se hace cargo de jardines, cocinar, servir mesas, limpieza de casas y oficinas o levantar cosechas.

Pero las decenas, o cientos de personas que se manifestaron la noche del sábado alrededor del Centro de Detenciones Federales de Los Angeles permitieron que Stephen Miller, Subjefe de Asesores de la Casa Blanca y un connotado anti-migrante, enviará un tweet con alegatos de "insurrección contra las leyes y la soberanía de Estados Unidos".

La situación da nuevo cuerpo a preocupaciones sobre autoritarismo y xenofobia.

Y sobre todo, la posibilidad de violencia. La Guardia Nacional no es un cuerpo de policía sino militar.
De entrada, es la primera vez desde 1965 que hay una movilización de tropas de la Guardia Nacional sin petición del gobierno estatal; en ese entonces, el entonces presidente Lyndon B. Johnson la usó para hacer cumplir la integración racial en Alabama.

En ese marco, las expresiones de descontento por el despliegue de la policía fronteriza (Immigration and Customs Enforcement-ICE), que parece tener "manos libres" para llenar a como dé lugar y sin importar como, una cuota de deportaciones, pusieron de relieve lo que para algunos es una creciente señal de autoritarismo y para otros la decisión de "recuperar" el país.

Los relatos no solo de razzias en las que resultan detenidos y hasta lesionados ciudadanos estadounidenses de origen latino, sino de abusos de autoridad contra turistas extranjeros, incluso europeos, no ayudan en cuanta imagen internacional, pero sí a la audiencia doméstica de Trump y sus aliados.

El uso de la milicia refleja la decisión del gobierno Trump de usar leyes de emergencia para enfrentar lo que la derecha radical –grupos racistas incluidos– ha definido por años como la "invasión" de Estados Unidos.

¿Habrá "manos libres" para la Guardia Nacional?
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Topics

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Related Articles

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Germany: US under Trump: Supreme Court Paves the Way for Racial Profiling

Israel: From the Cities of America to John Bolton: Trump’s Vendetta Campaign against Opponents Reaches New Heights

Germany: The President and His Private Army