Pressure on Ukraine: The US Administration’s Focus Is Backward

Published in Sankei Shimbun
(Japan) on 14 October 2026
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dorothy Phoenix. Edited by Patricia Simoni.

 

 

President Donald Trump is trying to tie the hands of Ukraine as it fights Russia. This is difficult to understand: Doesn't aiming in the wrong direction benefit the aggressor?

Trump announced an agreement Oct. 9 on social media that Russia would provide diesel oil to the U.S. and the international market. The U.S. Treasury Department eased sanctions on Russian diesel exports. Russian President Vladimir Putin's administration decided to partially ease its ban on exporting diesel.

Furthermore, Trump unilaterally announced again on social media on Oct. 11 that Russia and Ukraine had reached a ceasefire agreement on energy-related facilities, effective immediately.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed surprise at the announcement of a mutual ceasefire on energy-related facilities, telling covering the U.S. media that it “was news for me.” He further commented that “we are ready to respect an energy ceasefire if Russia is ready to do the same.”

However, even after Trump's social media post, Zelenskyy announced on X that Russia had attacked a Ukrainian power station.

It is disturbing that Trump went over Ukraine's head to talk about a ceasefire on energy facilities.

Ukraine is using drones and striking oil refining facilities among other installations, working to diminish Russia's capability to continue the war. According to The Guardian, in July and August of this year, More than 170,000 tons of diesel were shipped from South Korea to Russia. Significantly, Ukraine's resistance is certainly bearing results.

The Trump administration's current response is undermining Ukraine's efforts. It could revive Russia's ability to produce diesel fuel and in turn support its war of aggression.

The majority Republican Party is reportedly facing an unfavorable outcome in the November midterm elections. The party will likely try to buy the voters’ s favor by supporting cost reductions in gas prices, but it is unclear if that will work. It is questionable whether Russia, which must transport diesel from South Korea, can export enough oil quickly and sufficiently enough to influence oil prices.

Ukraine's growing dissatisfaction with the Trump administration is understandable. The Trump administration has suggested that if Ukraine does not end its strikes on Russian refineries, the U.S. will end intelligence sharing.

There must be no confusion about which party to pressure if you want to end the war.


<主張>ウクライナへ圧力 米政権の矛先は逆さまだ

トランプ米大統領がロシアに抗戦するウクライナの手足を縛ろうとしている。理解に苦しむ話だ。矛先が逆(さか)さまで、侵略者を利するだけではないのか。

トランプ氏は9日、SNSで、ロシアが米国や国際市場への軽油の供給で合意したと表明した。米財務省はロシアの軽油輸出への制裁を緩和した。ロシアのプーチン政権は軽油の輸出禁止の一部緩和を決めた。

さらにトランプ氏は11日、ロシアとウクライナがエネルギー関連施設への攻撃停止で合意し、即時発効すると一方的に主張した。

ウクライナのゼレンスキー大統領はエネルギー関連施設への攻撃の相互停止について、米メディアの取材に「初耳だ」と驚きを隠さなかった。「露側がエネルギー分野の停戦に応じるなら同意する」とも語った。ただし、ゼレンスキー氏は、トランプ氏の投稿後も露軍がウクライナの発電所を攻撃したとXで明らかにした。

トランプ氏が、ウクライナの頭越しにエネルギー関連施設への攻撃停止を言い出したのは疑問である。

ウクライナは無人機(ドローン)を使って露国内の製油施設などを攻撃し、ロシアの継戦能力を減じようと努めてきた。英紙ガーディアンによると、今年の7、8月に韓国からロシアへ軽油が17万トン以上も運ばれた事実も明らかになっている。ウクライナの抗戦は一定の効果があったことを意味する。

今回のトランプ政権の対応はウクライナの努力を台無しにするものだ。露側の軽油生産を復活させ、その侵略戦争を後押しすることになりかねない。

11月の中間選挙で与党共和党の劣勢が報じられている。燃料価格の引き下げを実現することで米有権者の歓心を買おうとしているのかもしれないが、期待通りになるかは不透明だ。韓国から軽油を運ばなければならないようなロシアに油価を左右する迅速かつ大量の輸出ができるかは疑わしい。

ウクライナがトランプ政権への不満を強めているのはもっともである。

トランプ政権はウクライナがロシアの製油所への攻撃をやめなければ、情報共有を打ち切ることをちらつかせている。戦争を止めるために圧力をかける相手を取り違えてはならない。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: What It Means To Have Trump as an ‘Ally’*

Lebanon: Washington: The Limits of a Military Option

Venezuela: Rubbed the Wrong Way

Topics

Ireland: The Irish Times View on US Midterms: a Lame Duck Trump Is Still a Danger

Australia: Trump and Netanyahu Are Putting the World at Risk To Stay in Power

Canada: The Unpleasant Logic of Live-Streaming Nidal Hasan’s Execution

Egypt: What Happens in the US Economy Doesn’t Stay in the US Economy

Saudi Arabia: How UK-US Military Leases Secure Sovereign Concessions

Lebanon: Washington: The Limits of a Military Option

Related Articles

Germany: Trump Remains Putin’s Best Helper

Ireland: The Irish Times View on US Midterms: a Lame Duck Trump Is Still a Danger

Australia: Trump and Netanyahu Are Putting the World at Risk To Stay in Power

Egypt: What Happens in the US Economy Doesn’t Stay in the US Economy