Romney, Bachmann Winners of First Debate

Published in El Mundo
(Spain) on 15 June 2011
by Ricard Gonzalez (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Laura L. Messer. Edited by Janie Boschma.
A year and a half out from the U.S. presidential elections, the Republican primary campaign officially opened Monday night in New Hampshire with the first debate between the seven candidates who, at the moment, have already announced their intentions of aspiring to the White House.

Since there will be many other debates before the citizens of Iowa turn out for the caucus in February, the relevance of this first debate is relative. Notwithstanding, the dialogue between the candidates did indeed offer some signs about the narrative that will dominate the pre-campaign.

To begin with, Monday solidified Mitt Romney’s front-runner status, as many consider him the big winner of the debate. The former governor of Massachusetts offered a presidential image, responded confidently to all the questions and also improved his line of defense against his major weak point — the approval of healthcare reform in Massachusetts too similar to that of Obama's.

Due to his front-runner status, it was expected he would take the high road from the criticisms of his adversaries; however, it was a kid-glove debate, probably due to being the first. For Romney, coming out of the confrontation undamaged was already a complete victory.

The moderator served on a silver platter the opportunity for Tim Pawlenty, the other favorite of the seven contenders in the debate, to take a bite out of his greatest rival by asking Pawlenty about his definition of the healthcare reform he terms “Obamneycare.”

Pawlenty declined the offer, probably because he did not want to project an excessively aggressive image in his introduction to millions of voters. The decision appeared calculated as it has caused a resurgence of comments that Pawlenty is “too much of a good guy” to win the presidency.

Without a doubt, the other big winner was Michele Bachmann, who officially announced her candidacy on-air. The Minnesota congresswoman, considered a type of alter ego of Palin, offered some of the cleverest responses of the evening and received numerous ovations on the part of the public.

The charismatic Bachmann is a rising star in the Republican galaxy and could turn out to be the surprise of the primaries, because, among other reasons, she is well situated to win the caucuses in Iowa, her birth state, which would propel her candidacy.

Some, with certain wickedness, have defined her “a Sarah Palin with a brain.” In fact, if her popularity continues rising as Republican voters get to know her, she could end up permanently displacing Palin from the fight for the White House. The former governor of Alaska continues to keep up suspense about her future plans, but if she holds out for too long, she could discover that Bachmann has stolen her title as the icon of conservative America.

The other four candidates did not commit any glaring mistakes, but neither was their performance sufficiently good enough to escape from the pack and get into the group of front-runners in the primaries.


Romney y Bachmann ganadores del primer debate

A un año y medio de las elecciones presidenciales en EEUU, el lunes por la noche se abrió oficialmente en New Hampshire la campaña de las primarias republicanas con el primer debate entre los siete candidatos que, de momento, ya han anunciado su intención de aspirar a la Casa Blanca.

Aún se celebrarán otros muchos debates antes de que los ciudadanos de Iowa acudan a los “caucus” en febrero del 2012, por lo que la relevancia de este primer debate es relativa. No obstante, el diálogo entre los candidatos sí ofreció algunas señales sobre la narrativa que va a dominar la precampaña.

Para empezar, el lunes se consolidó la condición de gran favorito de Mitt Romney, al que muchos consideran el gran ganador del debate. El ex gobernador de Massachusetts ofreció una imagen presidencial, respondió con seguridad a todas las preguntas, e incluso mejoró su línea de defensa ante su mayor punto débil, la aprobación de un reforma sanitaria en Massachusetts demasiado parecida a la de Obama.

Por su condición de favorito, se esperaba que se convirtiera en el blanco de las críticas de sus adversarios. No obstante, probablemente por ser el primero, fue un debate de guante blanco. Para Romney, salir indemne de la confrontación ya fue toda una victoria.

A Tim Pawlenty, el otro favorito de los siete contendientes en el debate, el presentador le sirvió en bandeja la ocasión de clavar una dentellada a su máximo rival, al preguntarle por su definición de la reforma sanitaria como “Obamneycare”.

No obstante, declinó esta posibilidad, probablemente porque no quiso dar una imagen excesivamente agresiva en su presentación a millones de electores. La decisión pareció calculada, pero ha hecho resurgir los comentarios de que Pawlenty es demasiado "buen chico" como para ganar unas presidenciales.

Sin duda, la otra gran ganadora fue Michele Bachmann, que anunció en antena oficialmente su candidatura. La congresista de Minnesota, considerada una especie alter ego de Palin, ofreció algunas de las respuestas más ingeniosas de la noche, y recibió numerosas ovaciones por parte del público.

La carismática Bachmann es una estrella ascendente dentro del firmamento republicano, y podría convertirse en la sorpresa de las primarias. Entre otras cosas, porque está bien situada para ganar los “caucus” de Iowa, su estado natal, lo que propulsaría su candidatura.

Algunos, con cierta maldad, la han definido como una “Sarah Palin con cerebro”. De hecho, si su popularidad continúa subiendo a medida que se da a conocer entre los electores republicanos, podría acabar de desplazando a Palin definitivamente de la lucha por la Casa Blanca. La ex gobernadora de Alaska mantiene el suspense respecto a sus planes de futuro, pero si tarda demasiado definirse, podría descubrir que Bachmann le ha robado el título de icono de la América conservadora.

Los otros cuatro candidatos no realizaron ningún error de bulto, pero tampoco su actuación fue suficientemente buena como para escapar del furgón de cola de las primarias, y entrar en el grupo de cabeza.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Topics

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?