Goldman: Speculation and Impunity

Published in La Jornada
(Mexico) on 22 March 2012
by John Saxe-Fernández (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Pedro Garcés Satué. Edited by Katya Abazajian.
“Today is my last day at Goldman Sachs. After almost 12 years at the firm, I can honestly say that the environment now is as toxic and destructive as I have ever seen it… To put the problem in the simplest terms, the interests of the client continue to be sidelined in the way the firm operates… The firm has veered so far… I can no longer in good conscience say that I identify with what it stands for.” The New York Times of March 14 echoed the resignation of Greg Smith, who was Goldman Sachs’ executive director and head of the firm's U.S. equity derivatives business in Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Once again, deception, impunity and lack of control are affecting the lives, the jobs and the assets of thousands of people inside and outside of the United States given the extent of the businesses of this investment bank. At the same time, the complicity and the symbiosis of the imperial presidency Bush/Obama and the Congress is being shown with this modus operandi.

An institutional context of corrosive usury and greed is prevailing in some banks and investment firms that are beacons of high finance such as CitiGroup, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, etc. In 2008, this context was fed by excessive bailouts and benefits of $13 and $14 trillions. These are businesses and corruptions that include clean-up operations and make the Banking Fund for the Protection of Savings and the Mexicana de Aviación disaster seem cunning operations run by petty thieves. The Consejo Coordinador Empresarial is behind the big loot, that is, floating Pemex-CFE where sharks such as Goldman Sachs are operating and betting, something that is part of the electoral offer proposed by the usual Peña Nieto and Vázquez Mota. They ask for votes in order to strip the electorate of assets which are linked to the people and increasingly more valuable for the oil ceiling and whenever the world energy equation favors the public control of vital resources. Thanks to the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, a law passed by Bill Clinton in 2000, they offer to bring national wealth where clients and nations are impoverished. According to economist Chris Hedges, Goldman Sachs’ commodities price index is the most quoted in world markets. Thanks to Clinton, the company speculates based on popular demand: rice, wheat, corn, sugar, meat, minerals, metals and fossil fuels.

Smith’s resignation is revealing: “Over the course of my career I have had the privilege of advising two of the largest hedge funds on the planet, five of the largest asset managers in the United States, and three of the most prominent sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East and Asia. My clients have a total asset base of more than $1 trillion. I have always taken a lot of pride in advising my clients to do what I believe is right for them, even if it means less money for the firm. This view is becoming increasingly unpopular at Goldman Sachs. Another sign that it was time to leave.”

Although the role of some operators, such as Robert Rubin, who is close to the current, unmentionable presidents, left a permanent sign in the crisis and subsequent plundering of Mexican public funds (and oil) during the great operation of speculation and bailout that made the country kneel down after the debacle of December 1994, Smith thinks that the actions of Lloyd C. Blankfein and Gary D. Cohn, chief operating officer and president of Goldman Sachs, is one of the most serious threats to the survival of the firm even though Blankfein declared on London newspaper, The Times, that Goldman Sachs was doing God’s work. The idea of securitizing hundreds of thousands of toxic mortgages started there. Later, Goldman Sachs, just like other banks and firms, sold these mortgages to its clients at the same time that it was betting against them.

The prosperity of Goldman Sachs was not due to the wonders of God, but to the money it received from benefits and bailouts of the Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve, which proceeded to print money as had never been done since Tiberius in 33 BC, who aimed to recover the finances of the Roman Empire. The Federal Reserve acts as a central bank, it has the monopoly for the issuing of currency, and therefore regulates interest rates and determines the amount of money that flows into the economy.

Those in the Mexican Congress, who passed the unusual rise of the IMF quota without pity or responsibility, should remember where the funds will end up: with Blankfein. A few months after the collapse that made thousands become unemployed, the executives of Goldman Sachs obtained the biggest compensation in Goldman Sachs’ history of 143 years; according to official figures revealed by Hedges at Zuccotti Park in front of hundreds of squatters, the executives received $18 billion in 2009, $16 billion in 2010 and $10 billion in 2011. Blankfein was later arrested by the New York police in front of Goldman Sachs headquarters.

Smith is ashamed of this and he is resigning.


“Hoy es mi último día en la firma. Después de casi 12 años –en Goldman Sachs (GS)–... digo con honestidad que su ambiente es hoy muy tóxico y destructivo... en síntesis, el problema es que en sus operaciones se abandonó el interés de los clientes... la empresa se desvió tanto... que siendo honesto no puedo identificarme con sus objetivos”. La renuncia de Gregg Smith, director ejecutivo de GS y principal encargado de los mayores y magnos portafolios de derivados en Europa, Medio Oriente, África y Asia, fue destacada por el New York Times del 14 de marzo. Ahí se desnuda, una vez más el desenfreno usurero, el engaño y la impunidad que, dada la magnitud de los negocios de esta firma de inversión, afectan patrimonio, empleo y vida de millones dentro y fuera de Estados Unidos, mostrando de paso la complicidad y simbiosis de la presidencia imperial Bush/Obama, el Congreso y las cortes con este modus operandi.

Prevalece un contexto institucional de corrosiva usura y codicia en instituciones ícono de la alta finanza, bancos y firmas de inversión tipo CitiGroup, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, etcétera, alimentado en 2008 por desmedidos rescates y subsidios de entre 13 y 14 billones (trillions) de dólares. Son negocios y corruptelas que incluyen operaciones de lavado y que hacen aparecer al Fobaproa o al desastre de Mexicana de Aviación como astutas operaciones de roba-gallinas, con el Consejo Coordinador Empresarial tras el botín mayor: lanzar a Pemex-CFE al piso de remates donde operan y apuestan tiburones como GS, parte de la oferta electoral de los Peña Nieto y Vázquez Mota de siempre. Piden el voto para despojar al electorado de un patrimonio legado al pueblo, cada día más valioso por el techo del petróleo y cuando la ecuación energética mundial favorece el control público de recursos vitales. Ofrecen llevar la riqueza nacional ahí donde, gracias a la Commodity Futures Modernization Act –una ley firmada por Bill Clinton en 2000–, se esquilma a clientes y naciones enteras. Según el economista Chris Hedges (TruthDig 4/11/2011) el índice de commodities de GS es el más cotizado en los mercados del mundo. Gracias a Clinton la empresa acapara y especula con el hambre popular: arroz, trigo, maíz, azúcar, carne, incluyéndose minerales, metales y combustibles fósiles.

La renuncia de Smith es reveladora: “En el curso de mi carrera he tenido el privilegio de manejar dos de los mayores hedge funds del planeta, cinco de las mayores administradoras de activos en Estados Unidos y tres de los más prominentes fondos soberanos de Europa, Medio Oriente y de Asia. Los activos de mis clientes han llegado a totalizar un valor base de más de un billón (trillion) de dólares. Me enorgullezco de haberlos aconsejado en lo que más les convenía, aunque ello significara menos ganancia para la firma. Esta perspectiva es más y más rara en GS. Otro indicio de que era el momento de renunciar”. (Ibid)

Aunque el papel de operadores como Robert Rubin, cercano a innombrables presidentes de turno, dejó una huella indeleble en la crisis y posterior saqueo del erario (y del crudo) mexicano durante la magna operación de especulación/rescate que puso de rodillas al país luego de la debacle de diciembre de 1994, para Smith la actuación de Lloyd C. Blankfein y de Gary D. Cohn, director ejecutivo y presidente de Goldman Sachs, también representan la más seria amenaza a la sobrevivencia de esa firma, aunque Blankfein proclamara a The Times de Londres, que GS realizaba el trabajo de Dios, posiblemente porque de ahí salió y se impulsó la idea de securitizar cientos de miles de hipotecas tóxicas que luego GS, como los otros bancos y firmas, vendió a su clientela mientras apostaba contra ellas.

La bonanza de GS no fue por la gracia de Dios sino por los dineros que recibió de subsidios y rescates del Departamento del Tesoro y de la Fed, que procedió a imprimir dinero como pocas veces desde que Tiberio, en el año 33, decidió rescatar las finanzas del Imperio Romano. La Fed funge como banco central, tiene el monopolio para la emisión de moneda, por tanto regula el precio del crédito –las tasas de interés– y determina la cantidad de dinero que fluye en la economía.
Quienes en el Congreso mexicano aprobaron, sin pena y responsabilidad, un inusitado aumento de la cuota al FMI, recuerden dónde van los fondos: bajo Blankfeim, a pocos meses del colapso que dejó en la calle a millones, los altos cargos de Goldman Sachs se recetaron la mayor compensación registrada en su historia de 143 años: 18 mil millones de dólares (mmdd) en 2009; 16 mmdd en 2010 y 10 mmdd en 2011, según cifras oficiales dadas a conocer por Hedges en el parque Zuccotti ante cientos de ocupas. Luego fue arrestado por la policía neoyorquina frente a las oficinas centrales de Goldman Sachs.

A Smith le da vergüenza y renuncia.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Topics

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Related Articles

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Mexico: US Pushes for Submission

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Afghanistan: Defeat? Strategic Withdrawal? Maneuver?