After a checkered campaign, Mitt Romney managed to secure the delegates he needed to become his party's candidate for the U.S. presidency. The nomination will be announced at the Republican National Convention in Florida in August. Romney will attempt to fulfill the Republican leadership's promise to prevent the reelection of Barack Obama. To that end, the Republicans have made use of every tactic available to them, some of which are barely legitimate, frequently going too far in the use of media in order to achieve their goal.
Perhaps the most controversial tactic has been their dogged obstruction of measures designed for a more rapid exit from the economic crisis that Obama inherited from his predecessor. Among the victims of this are millions of workers who lost their jobs after the crisis. Romney has taken advantage of this situation, criticizing the president for his inability to solve the country's economic problems, unemployment among them. What he has not said is that his own party members in Congress are the ones who have stood in the way of economic recovery, time and again voting against recovery programs proposed by Obama's administration. The conclusion drawn by 50 percent of the population is that the president is solely responsible for unemployment. The latest opinion polls show the president and his Republican rival in an almost dead heat on the question of who is the most able to solve the country’s economic problems.
There are still five months to go before the elections, and anything could happen. The only thing that can be said for sure is that the campaign will be long and very probably plagued with attacks, most of which will have no factual basis. An example is the recent event organized by Donald Trump, which raised $2 million for Romney's campaign. For the umpteenth time, the organizer raised doubts over the president's nationality and demanded that Obama prove his status as a U.S. citizen by releasing his birth certificate.* As well as being dirty, the campaign seems set to be the most expensive in American history. The Washington Post reported that, in just nine states, candidate support committees spent $87 million on television adverts, an unprecedented sum for the electoral process.
From now on, Obama must act decisively to hold off the onslaught that the Republican Party has launched on all fronts. Once again it looks as if the independent voters will be the ones to decide the outcome of the election, and Obama must convince them that not only is his government not directly responsible for the slow economic recovery, but also - and this could prove more difficult - that he has not been able to fulfill his electoral promises because of the Republican leadership's obstructions.
* In fact, Obama released his long-form birth certificate last year, but since then, Trump and the birther movement have been calling into question the authenticity of the document.
Después de una accidentada campaña para obtener la nominación de su partido como candidato a la presidencia de Estados Unidos, Mitt Romney logró reunir los votos necesarios para que la convención republicana, a realizarse en agosto en Florida, lo declare formalmente su candidato. Romney tratará de impedir la relección de Barack Obama y de esa forma consumar la promesa que el liderazgo republicano hizo en tal sentido. Para lograr su propósito los republicanos han echado mano de todos los recursos a su alcance, algunos de ellos en el borde de la legalidad, excediéndose frecuentemente en los medios para lograr su meta.
Tal vez el recurso más controvertido ha sido su tesón en obstaculizar las medidas encaminadas a salir con mayor celeridad de la crisis económica que Obama heredó de su antecesor. Entre las víctimas de ese propósito están millones de trabajadores que perdieron su empleo tras la crisis. Esta situación ha sido aprovechada por Romney para criticar al presidente por su incapacidad para resolver los problemas económicos del país, entre ellos el desempleo. Lo que no ha dicho es que son sus propios compañeros de partido en el Congreso quienes han impedido la recuperación económica, votando una y otra vez en contra de programas diseñados por la administración de Obama para superarla. La lectura que hace 50 por ciento de la población es que el único responsable del desempleo es el presidente. Según las más recientes encuestas de opinión hay un empate virtual entre él y su contrincante republicano sobre quién es el más capacitado para resolver los problemas económicos de ese país.
Aún faltan cinco meses para que las elecciones y pudieran pasar muchas cosas. Lo único que por ahora se puede asegurar es que la campaña será no sólo larga, sino que muy probablemente plagada de ataques, muchos de ellos sin base alguna. Un ejemplo es el acto recientemente organizado por Donald Trump, en el que se reunieron 2 millones de dólares para la campaña de Romney; por enésima vez el organizador puso en duda la nacionalidad del presidente y exigió que Obama comprobara su calidad de ciudadano estadunidense presentando su acta de nacimiento. Además de escabrosa, la campaña se vislumbra como la más cara en la historia estadunidense. El diario Washington Post informó que en tan sólo nueve estados, los comités de apoyo a los candidatos gastaron 87 millones en anuncios de televisión, una suma sin precedente en los procesos electorales.
A partir de ahora Obama deberá actuar decisivamente para contrarrestar la embestida que el Partido Republicano ha emprendido desde todos los frentes. Uno de ellos, convencer al electorado independiente, quien al parecer será una vez más el que decida la elección, que su gobierno no es el directamente responsable de la lenta recuperación económica, y de algo, tal vez más difícil, que no ha podido cumplir sus promesas de campaña debido al obstruccionismo del liderazgo republicano.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.