Where Does His Anger Come From?

Published in El Universal
(Mexico) on 27 April 2010
by Periodistas de El Universal (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Gabriela Mackenzie. Edited by Amy Wong.
What part of the statement "Bill Clinton supports Mexico" didn't the secretary of the interior understand? Where does his anger come from? Last Saturday, the former United States president announced he was in favor of a "Plan Mexico" against drug trafficking, designed by Mexico "so that no Mexican would think that we are intervening in his or her affairs or trying to determine their future."* Yes, he did say that no country, not even our country, can win a war on its own. The next day, Sunday, Clinton defended Mexico in front of the Univision audience: "It's not a failed country. ... Felipe Calderon has made huge efforts to defend society from drug traffickers."* He even went against former president George W. Bush because "he allowed the ban on the sale of assault weapons to expire." But that very Sunday afternoon, some guy named Fernando Gomez Mont angrily "replied" to Clinton: “We need to bear the shame of the fact that we are collecting the weapons with which Mexicans are killed in this country, and the money comes from your consumer market, which is the one that encourages and stimulates violence in Mexico," he said. Come again? Did he read not Clinton's full declaration, or does he know something the rest of us don’t know or don’t understand? Obviously, the State Department spokesman, Philip Crowley, replied, "[A]s the Secretary has said and as I think President Calderon has said, on both sides of the border we need to do more." He complained, "[W]e are significantly invested in the Merida Initiative." Where did Gomez Mont get lost? Where did we all get lost? That thing about “hanging Arizona” does sound good. But it will never happen from the U.S., and Mexico won't be able to do it for very simple reasons: if Mexico could find a way to "block" the economy with Arizona, it would affect Mexicans on both sides of the border. Any action against this racist law, which violates human rights, will come from politics, just like the President of the Senate Carlos Navarrate said, “This law is a wet slap in the face for Obama, a son of immigrants, part of the minority and, like an ‘evil wetback,’ just another one who's right-winged and cornered.”

It was learned that after the attack on Minerva Bautista, the head of public security in Michoacán, the Mexican Society of Bodyguards asked the secretaries of the interior and national defense for support to bear arms in order "to have the same power that organized crime uses" and allow free access to "adequate facilities to learn how to fire arms in a constant and permanent way." One question, though: who are they, these organized bodyguards?

On a final note: San Lazaro is like a madhouse. From today, Tuesday, until Friday, there will be work to do. The leaders of the blocs were stuck yesterday trying to define a route for the 100 initiatives and the 150 points in pending agreements. There's only one certainty: the anti-monopoly law will be approved and sent to the Senate. So they say.

*Editor’s Note: Quotes, accurately translated, could not be verified.


Como dicen por allí: ¿qué parte de “Bill Clinton apoya a México” no entendió el secretario de Gobernación? ¿De dónde su furia? El sábado pasado, el ex presidente de Estados Unidos se pronunció a favor de un “Plan México” contra el narco, diseñado por México “para que ningún mexicano piense que nosotros estamos interviniendo en sus asuntos o que tratamos de determinar el futuro”. Y sí, dijo que ni nuestro país ni ningún otro pueden ganar la guerra solo. Al día siguiente, el domingo, Clinton defendió a México frente a la audiencia de Univisión: “No es un Estado fallido […] Felipe Calderón ha hecho grandes esfuerzos para defender a la sociedad frente a los traficantes de drogas”. Incluso se lanzó contra el ex mandatario George W. Bush porque “permitió que expirara la prohibición de la venta de armas de asalto”. Pero ese mismo domingo por la tarde, un Fernando Gómez Mont furioso “respondió” a Clinton: “Necesitamos que asuman la vergüenza de estar reuniendo las armas con las que se asesina a mexicanos en este país, y la factura de que es su dinero, el de su mercado de consumo, el que fomenta e incentiva la acción de la violencia en México”, dijo. ¿Y eso? ¿Habrá leído la declaración completa de Clinton, o sabe algo que el resto no supo o no entendió? Por supuesto que el portavoz del Departamento de Estado, Philip Crowley, ya le respondió: “Creo que se puede decir que hay que hacer más a ambos lados de la frontera”, y con un reclamo: “Hemos invertido mucho en la Iniciativa Mérida…” ¿En dónde se perdió Gómez Mont, o dónde nos perdimos todos?

Suena bien, lo de “ahorcar Arizona”. Pero desde EU no sucederá nunca, y México no podrá hacerlo por razones simples: si encontrara la forma de “bloquear” la economía de Arizona, afectaría a los mexicanos en este y del otro lado de la frontera. Cualquier acción contra esta ley racista y violatoria de los derechos humanos vendrá desde la política, en todo caso; como dijo el presidente del Senado, Carlos Navarrete: la ley es una bofetada con mano mojada para Obama, un hijo de migrantes, parte de la minoría y, como “vil wetback”, un acorralado más de la derecha.

Se supo que tras el atentado a la titular de Seguridad Pública de Michoacán, Minerva Bautista, la Sociedad Mexicana de Guardaespaldas solicitó a las secretarías de Gobernación y de la Defensa Nacional apoyo para la portación de armas “que equiparen la potencia que emplea la delincuencia organizada”, y permiso para acceder libremente a “instalaciones adecuadas para recibir instrucción de tiro de manera constante y permanente”. Una pregunta: ¿Y quiénes son estos, los guaruras organizados?

Apunte final: San Lázaro es como un manicomio. De hoy martes al viernes habrá trabajo para aventar. Los líderes de las bancadas se atoraron ayer tratando de definir una ruta para las 100 iniciativas y los 150 puntos de acuerdo pendientes. Sólo hay una certeza: que la ley antimonopolios será aprobada y enviada al Senado. Eso dicen.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Topics

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Related Articles

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Mexico: US Pushes for Submission

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Afghanistan: Defeat? Strategic Withdrawal? Maneuver?