Obama and His Honeymoon

Published in Lianhe Zaobao
(Singapore) on 08 February 2009
by Qingshan, Chen (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Mona Lim. Edited by .
A new broom always tries to sweep cleaner than the old one. Newcomers usually state their intentions to do something loud and clear and set the tone right. The present situation is never good enough and earthshaking changes have to be made. It is rare to have newcomers who will just take over and follow what their successors have done wholesale. What is common are newcomers who start off on a promising note and later fail to keep up with the momentum or even falter.

Obama had a magnificent inauguration ceremony that will go down in history. Equally magnificent is the expectation of the people for the “reforms” that he has promised. However, this expectation is unlikely to turn into reality in the short-run as Obama is still gathering his clout.

First of all, although Obama has stuck to his promise of fostering cooperation between the two rival political parties, the gulf between the two is simply too entrenched and wide to
bridge. While the House passed Obama’s economic stimulus package last week, all the Republican senators cast opposing votes to protest against House of Representative Speaker Pelosi and other Democratic senators for ignoring Obama’s call for inter-party cooperation in order to ostracize the Republicans.

As the Congressional debate over the economic plan kicks off this week, Republican leaders have openly advocated the use of a filibuster to block the vote unless major changes are made. As things look, the much-anticipated economic stimulus package is unlikely to receive the green light from Congress by the middle of this month before the term ends, much against what Obama had initially hoped.

Second, the Obama administration has seen the withdrawal of three of its nominees over misconduct. This has put the president’s integrity into question.

Daschle’s Nomination Saga

Of all nomination sagas, none has stirred up more controversy than that of Daschle, a Democrat and the former U.S. Senate majority leader, for the secretary of Health and Human Services.

Over the past two years, Daschle received $220,000 in speaking fees from the health care industry. In addition, he earned a total of $5.2 million for consultancy services he rendered to insurance, hospital, real estates, energy and power sectors.

Daschle has been embroiled in a tax scandal for omitting a car and chauffeur provided to him by a former employer in his tax submission. Moreover, his extraction of speaking and consultancy fees from health care and pharmaceutical bodies has put him in a conflict of interest. This has raised doubts over his suitability as a choice of someone who can accomplish Obama’s task in reforming the health care system.

Daschle turned to the business world after he was defeated in re-election five years ago, making him a typical hybrid of politician and businessman in the money game between lobby speakers and the government played in Washington. It reflects the many options and ways to spin money open to Washington elites who, more often than not, find themselves caught in the conflict of interest web.

Daschle is special to Obama. He was Obama’s de facto tutor in politics and one of the key Democratic contributors to having won the nomination as president. Obama staunchly supported and stood by Daschle initially. The president paid tributes to Daschle’s experience and emphasized his honesty as no attempt was made to conceal the tax omission.

Obama has vowed to set things right in Washington and make changes to the culture that engages in the exchange of interests between the commercial and political sectors. The president has drawn critics from commentators as some members of his team have allegedly put themselves "on the wrong side of history," one after another. The commentators criticized Obama of calling for integrity on one hand and backing Daschle on the other and accused him of not practicing what he preaches.

To build his dream government, which is socially responsible with no conflict of interest, Obama accepted the withdrawal of Daschle from his nomination, but not without reluctance.

Americans have always termed the first 100 days of the President’s office as the “honeymoon” period. How much can Obama do in his first 100 days in the face of numerous unspoken rules in Washington?

If Obama is unable to realize his campaign promise for reforms within his first100 days, he will risk falling support from the people. If this happens, his honeymoon period will be cut short.

The higher the hope the people have for Obama is, the steeper the “slope” of confidence that they have for him will be. American media cartoonists have played on these two words very often recently. It serves to caution Obama that he has only two ways out: either he swims or he drowns.


新官上任总是三把火,一要先声夺人来个下马威,二要改变现状干出一番轰轰烈烈的事业。萧规曹随,得过且过的新官很少见,可是三把火之后虎头蛇尾,有始无终甚至不了了之的新官比比皆是。
奥巴马的就职礼盛况空前,而随着其高调就职,公众对“变革”的期望达到顶峰,可是这期望看来无法迅速落实,奥巴马的三把火暂时还烧不起来。

首先,奥巴马上任后虽力图贯彻其推动两党合作的承诺,但国会两党议员的党同伐异文化实在根深蒂固,无法消除。众议院上周虽通过了刺激经济方案,但全体共和党众议员投反对票,抗议众院议长佩洛西和其他民主党议员没理会奥巴马的跨党合作指示,变相排斥共和党人。
参议院本周开始辩论振兴方案,共和党领袖更是公开叫阵,要求大幅修改方案,否则就利用“无限期辩论”(filibuster)手段阻绕参院表决方案。看样子,万众期待的振兴方案将无法如奥巴马所愿,在本月中国会寒假休会之前通过。

其次,奥巴马政府三位候任高官因操守出现问题而退出提名,令总统诚信受质疑。

达施勒提名沸沸扬扬

其中闹得最沸沸扬扬的是前参议院民主党领袖达施勒出任卫生部长的提名风波。
达斯勒过去两年曾当医药保健业顾问和代言人,并获取22万美元酬劳,此外,根据达斯勒向政府道德署提呈的财务报告,他曾为保险业、医院、房地产业、能源和电讯公司提供咨询服务,总共赚取了520万美元的酬劳。

达施勒是因聘任他为顾问的公司提供汽车和司机服务多年,却没在报税表内申报,而有漏税之嫌。而他从健康保健与医药机构接收代言费和咨询费,则牵涉“利益冲突”,令人怀疑他是否能胜任奥巴马委托给他的任务,改革医疗制度。

达施勒五年前连任失败后弃政投商,是华盛顿官商一体以及说客与政府之间权力与金钱游戏的典型例子,它反映了华府政治精英出路多,收入途径也多,容易引发利益冲突的现象。
达施勒和奥巴马的关系非比寻常,算得上是奥巴马的政治导师,也是奥巴马赢得民主党总统提名的功臣之一。

奥巴马起先还力挺达施勒,赞赏达施勒的上述工作经验,并强调达施勒并没有掩饰漏税问题,为人诚实。

但由于奥巴马承诺为华府树立新风、改变官商利益相授的文化,如今接二连三传出其班子其身不正,已引起评论家批评他一边高喊道义,一边挺达施勒的做法为说的是一套做的是一套。

奥巴马周二为了兑现其组建“有道德,负责任,同各方没有利益冲突”的廉洁政府,最后也只有“挥泪
斩马谡”,接受达施勒退出提名。

美国舆论爱把总统上任头100天当作“蜜月期”。面对华府官场种种潜规则,奥巴马在头100天里能够有多少作为?

如果奥巴马上任首100天内无法兑现竞选承诺和推动变革,就将面临支持率滑坡的危险,他的蜜月期也将提早结束。

民众对奥巴马的期望(hope)越高,对他信心下滑(slope)的失望将越高。美国媒体漫画家最近频频拿这两个字来做画,警戒奥巴马不进则退。

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Singapore: Trump’s America Brings More Chaos, but Not Necessarily More Danger

Singapore: No Ukraine Cease-fire – Putin Has Called Trump’s Bluff

Singapore: Lessons from the Trump-Zelenskyy Meltdown – for Friends and Foes

Singapore: In Trump and Musk’s America, Echoes of China’s Past Emerge