China and the US Can Build a “Non-Alliance” Cooperation

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 20 February 2012
by Fan Wang (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Cheechen Chan. Edited by Tom Proctor.
There exist many options in U.S.-China strategy. From the “China threat theory” to the “strategic reassurance,” one of the main ideas is to seek from among strategies with multiplicity to ones with duality, then to possible certainties, then a strategic certainty.

In order to have a cooperative and peaceful development, a new form of Sino-American relations is imperative. There are, however, realistic restrictions which prevent this relationship from being taken to another level. There is a certain measure of unspoken strategic recognition between China and the U.S., but their strategic consensus is very limited. At the same time, despite their highly strategic dependence, the possibility of strategic confrontation between these two nations has nevertheless not been eliminated.

Sino-American relations depend on the interaction and coordination between two main factors, competition and cooperation; the key to its development is how to promote peace and cooperation. From the perspective of internal affairs and foreign relations, the impact of the international system on China is far greater than that on the U.S. Due to the differences in their stages of development and international status, China has greater self-discipline than the United States, whereas the U.S. finds itself in a great paradox of strategic planning. The superpower status which America enjoys enables it to rise above any constraints and to go its own way. Yet, this has or will soon lead to a greater rebound both internationally and domestically, and the domestic impact will keep increasing. America often finds it hard to reconcile the incongruity between “keeping the position of a world power” and “maintaining stability.” As a result, they are miserable and caught in a strategic dilemma. The crux of the problem is U.S. hegemony, which will prevent the U.S. from exceeding its strategic paradox if it remains. This is precisely one of America’s challenges of the century.

Currently, China is attempting to change the Sino-American cooperation under the outlook of power politics via five ways: First, fortifying interdependence; second, emphasizing the severity of common threats; third, strengthening cooperation on the international level, as there is much room for this type of cooperation; fourth, recognizing the importance of co-existing rather than replacing one another; and fifth, realizing the new non-alliance cooperation among major powers.

The U.S. has to avoid hedging, for China is not a bet for America, but a steadfast partner with which the U.S. can cooperate. At the same time, the U.S. needs to avoid the route of traditional Western hegemony and respect the “non-Western operations” of the world instead.

If cooperative relations with our competitors can be maintained, the development of Sino-American relations will be further promoted. I think that the outlook for Sino-American relations can be analyzed in three stages. With existing Sino-American relations as a starting point, the relations can be divided into three phases. The first is economic interdependence, the current and initial phase. The second is security and political interdependence. There will be more consensuses achieved in security and politics and an increase in strategic mutual trust, and both parties will not regard each other as strategic rivals. Third will be an integrated political and economic interdependence, a phase where non-traditional and non-alliance types of relationships between great powers are formed. At the moment, we are right in the middle of a difficult transition from the first phase into the second.

The author is a professor at the Institute of International Relations of China Foreign Affairs University.


王帆:中美能构筑“非联盟”型合作

摘要:对美国而言,美国需要避免两面下注,中国不是美国的赌注,而是美国可以合作的坚定伙伴。同时美国需要避免走传统西方式霸权统治的老路,尊重世界“非西方化进程”。

作者:王帆 外交学院国际关系研究所教授

美国对华战略存在多项选择。从“中国威胁论”到“战略再保障”,其中一个思路就是谋求确定性的战略,从多重性到双重性,再到尽可能的确定性。

合作与和平发展需要有一个新型的中美关系,而种种现实性制约使中美关系难以发展到新高度。现在中美间有一定程度的战略默契,但战略共识有限。同时,虽然双方战略依存度较高,但战略对抗的可能性也并未消除。

中美关系如何发展取决于竞争与合作这两大因素的互动和协调,如何促进和平与合作是中美关系发展的关键。从内政与外交相互影响的角度看,国际体制对中国的影响比对美国的影响更大一些,由于发展阶段和国际地位不同,中国的自律能力也远比美国要强。而美国则仍处于战略规划的巨大悖论之中:一超地位使美国可以无视国际上任何制约因素而自行其是,同时这又已经或即将引发国际国内社会的更大反弹,其中国内因素的影响将会继续加大。“维霸”与“维稳”的矛盾一直使美国难以协调,无法自控而陷于战略困境。问题的核心仍是美国的霸权情结,这个症结不除,其战略悖论就难以超越。而这恰恰是美国的世纪难题之一。

中国正在试图用五个办法来改变权力政治观下的中美合作:一是加强相互依存;二是强调共同威胁的严峻性;三是加强在国际制度层面的合作,这一合作发展空间很大;四是制度共存而不是相互取代;五是大国之间新型的非联盟合作。

对美国而言,美国需要避免两面下注,中国不是美国的赌注,而是美国可以合作的坚定伙伴。同时美国需要避免走传统西方式霸权统治的老路,尊重世界“非西方化进程”。

如果我们能够坚持合作竞争对手关系,就能推动中美关系向前发展。笔者以为中美关系发展可以用三阶段论来分析和展望。以现有中美关系为起点,中美关系分为三个阶段:第一阶段为经济相互依存,目前仍处于第一阶段,即初级阶段;第二阶段为安全与政治相互依存,意味着双方在政治安全上能达到更多共识,战略互信明显增强,不视对方为战略对手;第三阶段为政治经济综合相互依存阶段,形成非传统的、非联盟的大国关系。现在正处于第一阶段向第二阶段的艰难过渡之中。

▲(作者是外交学院国际关系研究所教授)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: Scorning Trump’s Golden Dome Would Be a Mistake

Australia: Which Conflicts of Interest? Trump Doubles Down on Crypto

Russia: Will Trump Investigate Harris? Political Analyst Responds*

Topics

Germany: Trump for the Charlemagne Prize!

Canada: It Turns Out Trump’s Tariffs Were Illegal After All

Australia: Trump’s Tariffs Were Already Ever-Changing. Now, Court Fights Add to the Uncertainty

Austria: Soon Putin Will Have Successfully Alienated Trump

Canada: Scorning Trump’s Golden Dome Would Be a Mistake

Related Articles

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary