Google Dominant

Published in La Vanguardia
(Spain) on 25 October 2012
by Unsigned Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Sullivan. Edited by Peter L. McGuire  .
Fifteen years ago, Google was only a project in the minds of two young entrepreneurs. Today it is the most popular search engine on the internet. Every day nearly 1.1 billion people use it – 60 percent of those with an internet connection. This success has led to the continued growth of Google, allowing it to buy iconic electronics-era firms like the handset maker Motorola and the video portal YouTube, and has boosted it to a dominant position in its industry.

The strength of Google, like so many things in life, has its dark side. For example, the use of content generated by quality media results in economic benefits that do not go, even partially, to the authors. Belgian newspaper publishers recently sued for recognition of their rights. It was in vain: Google did not agree to pay them and excluded them from its search engine.

Now there’s a new complaint, this time with broad European support, which could bear fruit. In fact, now there are leading companies already showing greater sensitivity to this issue – for example, Microsoft. Its new operating system, Windows 8, which will be available tomorrow, includes coordinated information service with quality media that will receive a share of revenue from its dissemination. That certainly seems a more fair and reasonable option, one that Google can and should share.


HACE quince años, Google era sólo un proyecto en la mente de dos jóvenes emprendedores. Hoy es el más popular motor de búsqueda de contenidos en internet. Cada día lo usan casi 1.100 millones de personas; es decir, el 60% de las que tienen conexión a la red. Este éxito ha propiciado el continuo crecimiento de Google, le ha permitido comprar firmas míticas de la era electrónica -como el fabricante de móviles Motorola o el portal de descargas de vídeo YouTube- y le ha aupado a una posición dominante en su sector. La pujanza de Google, como tantas cosas en esta vida, tiene su cara oscura. Por ejemplo, el uso de contenidos generados por medios de comunicación de calidad, del que obtiene beneficios económicos que no repercuten, ni siquiera parcialmente, en sus autores. Editores de prensa belgas litigaron recientemente para que se reconocieran sus derechos. Fue en balde: Google no se avino a retribuirles y, además, los excluyó de su buscador. Ahora se está gestando una nueva reclamación, esta vez con amplio apoyo europeo, que podría dar otro fruto. De hecho, ya hay firmas punteras que muestran mayor sensibilidad ante este asunto. Verbigracia, Microsoft. Su nuevo sistema operativo Windows 8, que se distribuirá a partir de mañana, incluye un servicio de información coordinado con medios de comunicación de calidad, que reciben una parte del ingreso por su difusión. Esa parece sin duda una opción más justa y razonable, que Google puede -y debería- compartir.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Topics

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Related Articles

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?

Spain: King Trump