Energy Independence Can Reduce the Risks in Sino-American Contest

Published in Hong Kong Economic Journals
(Hong Kong) on 19 July 2013
by Li Xin (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Winnie Yeung. Edited by Kyrstie Lane.
American geopolitics academic George Modelski presented the theory of “Long Cycles in World Politics” in 1987, suggesting that every 100 years or so, a war for world leadership takes place.

At the moment, China and the United States are both ahead of the rest of the world in terms of energy consumption, gross domestic product and influence. Therefore some critics view China as the United States’ main challenger.

China is currently adopting the strategy of “peaceful emergence,” hoping to rely on its own power to solve its economic, energy and environmental problems. With the breakthrough in shale gas extraction technology and the commercialization of liquefied coal gas technology, China hopes to follow the United States’ lead and become fully independent in energy consumption. This will provide material support for China’s “peaceful emergence” and also lower the possibility of Sino-American energy conflict, defying the “fate” of confrontation between these two nations.

China Should “Share the Same Ride” as the United States

Modelski divides world leadership into four stages: Firstly, the “world war” stage in which a new world leader emerges. It is followed by the “unequivocal world leadership” stage in which the leader establishes a new global order. The third stage is the “delegitimization” stage where the legitimacy of the leader is questioned but it remains powerful. Lastly, in the “decentralization” stage, the leader’s power dwindles and different emerging powers appear, forcing the existing leader to rely on war to maintain its legitimacy.

After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, China immediately became the biggest challenger to the United States. In 1996, professor of international politics Dr. Shi Yi Wen from Renmin University of China published an essay titled “The Centennial Order of International Politics and Its Insights to China,” which attracted wide attention and heated debate. He followed Modelski’s view that most challenges in these last 500 years have ended in vain. New world leaders normally are those who cooperated with the previous hegemonic nation, while the hegemon gradually faced major setbacks. Hence Shi suggests that China should adopt the policy of “sharing the same ride” with the United States: Cooperating instead of becoming the leader of the Third World, or continuing an isolationist policy, hiding her light under a bush.

However, the ability to “share the same ride” does not depend on China. Even though China and the United States cooperate on many fronts, when conflicts actually occur it is impossible for the United States to abandon its long-time ally, Japan. Conversely, Japan keeps hanging on to the United States, knowing that sharing the same ride with the United States is the best option it has. For this reason, Wen’s idea of “peaceful emergence” is still the mainstream point of view at the moment. Its central idea is that development in China should not and cannot depend on other countries; it should take matters into its own hands. Wen also pointed out that China should rely on the domestic market and improvements in technology to solve energy and environmental issues. This type of theory is in essence an extension of isolationism in order to minimize conflicts with other countries. Yet in reality, China still faces an increasing energy demand that can only be met by imports.

Energy Independence Is Not a Far-Fetched Dream

In the era of globalization, using imported energy for developing the local economy is the norm, yet inevitably creates competition among powerful nations. Realism, the mainstream theory in international relations, dictates that despite all the ideologies of emerging nations, these nations will still bring changes to international politics to satisfy their domestic needs (such as requiring energy to develop their economies). In the last decade, Chinese reliance on imported oil increased steadily. In 1990, 2.92 million tons of crude oil were imported and the degree of dependence on foreign oil was -20.5 percent; whereas in 2010, imports of crude oil increased to 2.4 billion tons and the degree of dependence on foreign oil reached a new height of 54.8 percent. Although, China has rich coal resources: In 2009 it became a net importer of coal.

In terms of natural gas, in 2011, the production of natural gas in China reached an historic height of 101.9 billion cubic meters. Yet at the same time, its degree of dependence on foreign natural gas also reached a new height of 24 percent. Some experts estimate that by 2020, China might need to import 200 billion cubic meters of natural gas, reaching a reliance of 50 percent. Naturally, this huge import of energy will have a huge impact on the current international political situation.

Last April, the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued the first liquefied natural gas (LNG) export license in the last 40 years, marking a milestone in the successful development in shale gas. The exporting corporation, Cheniere Energy, announced that beginning in 2015 they will produce 200 tons of American-produced LNG. We may be able to say that, since last year, energy independence in the United States has become a reality.

Many analysts maintain the view that the United States’ decreasing interference in Middle Eastern affairs is closely related to its energy independence. It is reducing its imports of energy and its substantial naval forces can block sea transport routes efficiently, which are both factors that sharpen the need for China to become energy independent too.

Royal Dutch Shell estimated that China owns 25.1 trillion cubic meters of extractable shale gas reserves, ranking first in the world. On Dec. 25, 2012, the China National Petroleum Corporation announced that they have reached a breakthrough in key shale gas technologies, reaching the same standard as similar foreign products. Also announced in November 2012 was the news that Petrochina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company had already produced and sold 11.253 million cubic meters of shale gas. Shenhua group also announced in September the opening of the first coal-to-liquid (CTL) gas station, signifying that CTL will operate in a commercial setting and reflecting that energy independence in China is no longer a far-fetched dream.

Minimize Conflicts and Avoid Wars

In truth, reasons for international conflicts vary. For example, well-known political theorist Samuel Phillips Huntington defines the Cold War conflicts as “clashes of ideologies” whereas post-Cold War conflicts are “clashes of civilizations.” International energy politics suggest that with oil, “10 percent is about economics and 90 percent is about politics.” Offensive realism scholars, such as professor of political science Dr. John J. Mearsheimer at University of Chicago, argue that survival is the primary motivation of all states in the international system and propose to preempt the development of China so as to avoid falling into a passive role in the future. However, going back to the issue of the outbreak of wars and conflicts, they are still tightly related to energy. Given that both China and the United States have rich shale gas reserves, when the cost of locally extracted energy is significantly lower than war, it will greatly reduce the potential cause of any conflict between the two nations.

The “long-cycle theory” is based on the history of great geographical discovery, when leaders and challengers in the past both fought for the same kind of need, such as colonies, markets, resources, energy or influence. If China reaches energy independence it will solve the demand for energy for its own economic development, and then a new situation will emerge: For the first time in 500 years, both the leader and its challenger will not have to expand their own living space but they will have to worry about the obstruction of energy transport.

Whether energy independence can prevent wars from happening or not is a question that only history can answer. At the moment, China remains at the industrializing and sub-urbanizing stage. The country has a huge energy demand that makes a complete halt of energy imports impossible. In addition, because of technological reasons and other objective conditions, China still has a long way to go until they reach complete energy independence. But China’s energy development provides a convincing argument for the prospect of “peaceful emergence.”


美國地緣政治學家莫德爾斯基(George Modelski)於1987年提出「國際政治長周期」理論(Long Cycles in World Politics),指每一百年左右就會發生一次世界領導權戰爭。
目前中美兩國在能源消耗、GDP和影響力方面都數一數二,故有論者把中國視為美國的主要挑戰者。
中國目前的發展戰略為「和平崛起」,希望依靠自身力量解決市場、能源和環境等問題。隨着去年頁岩氣開採技術的突破性發展,以及煤炭直接液化製油等技術的商業化,中國有望隨美國之後實現能源獨立。這將為中國「和平崛起」提供物質支持,也減低中美兩國能源衝突的可能,進而打破兩國走向全面對抗的「宿命」。
中國應「搭車」聯美
莫德爾斯基把世界領導權分為四個階段:首先是「世界大戰」階段,會產生新的世界領導者;其次是「沒有爭議性的世界領導者」階段,由領導者建立新的國際秩序;第三是「去合理化」階段,領導者權威備受質疑但依然強大;而「去中心化」的第四階段則出現領導者權威衰落,新興強權四起,領導者需要依賴戰爭維繫其權威。
蘇聯解體後,中國隨即成為美國的主要「挑戰者」。1995年,中國人民大學國際政治系教授時殷弘發表了《國際政治的世紀性規律及其對中國的啟示》一文,引起廣泛關注和討論。他根據莫德爾斯基的理論,認為近500年來的挑戰者都以失敗告終,新的世界領導者通常是「先前霸權國家的合作者」,而挑戰者的合作方也會遇到重要挫折。因此建議中國應該採取「搭車」的戰略,和美國合作,而不選擇成為第三世界的領導者,或繼續孤立主義的韜光養晦戰略。
可是,能否搭車不取決於中國。中美兩國雖有多種合作,但衝突真正發生後,要美國放棄其傳統盟友日本並不可能;反過來說,日本「緊抱美國大腿」企圖搭車也是其最優選擇。故此,溫家寶總理2003年提出的「和平崛起」目前依然是主流,其內涵是中國發展「不應當也不可能依賴外國,必須也只能把事情放在自己的力量的基點上」,又指中國將依靠國內市場及提高科技,以解決能源和環境問題。這種理論應屬「韜光養晦」戰略的延伸,以減少和其他國家的衝突;但面對國內日益增加的能源需求,卻始終需要依賴進口。
能源獨立非遙不可及
在全球化時代,利用進口能源發展經濟屬於常態,但也無可避免產生大國博弈。國際關係主要流派的現實主義認為,新興大國的崛起,無論其意志和主張為何,都會因為國內的需要(如經濟發展而需要能源)而挑戰國際格局。近十年來,中國石油對外依存度不斷增加。1990年原油進口292萬噸,對外依存度為-20.5%;2010年原油進口增加到了2.4億噸,對外依存度高達54.8%。雖然中國在煤炭方面的儲藏量豐富,但2009年開始也成為了煤炭淨進口國。
至於天然氣方面,2011年中國天然氣的產量達到了1019億立方米的歷史新高,但與此同時,對外依存度也上升至前所未有的24%。有專家估計到2020年時,中國可能需要進口2000億立方米天然氣,對外依存度達到50%。大量進口能源,很難對國際政治格局不產生影響。
去年4月,美國聯邦能源管理委員會(Federal Energy Regulatory Commission)批出了近40年來第一個液化天然氣(LNG)的出口許可,成為了頁岩氣發展十年來的一個成功標誌。出口LNG的Cheniere Energy宣布,由2015年開始,每年可以出口200噸美國產的LNG。可以說,由去年開始,美國的能源獨立已經成為了現實。
不少分析人士認為,美國減少對中東事務的干預,跟能源獨立有密切的關係。美國減少進口能源,其龐大的艦隊也可以更靈活地對海上運輸線進行封鎖,這都加強了中國對「能源獨立」的需要。
蜆殼公司(Royal Dutch Shell)估計,中國擁有25.1萬億立方米可開採的頁岩氣儲量,位居世界第一。去年12月25日,中國石油天然氣集團宣布在頁岩氣開發關鍵技術取得突破,性能達到外國同類產品水平。同時公布2012年11月底,中石油西南油氣田公司已生產並銷售了1125.3萬立方米頁岩氣。中國神華集團也於去年9月宣布首座煤製油的加油站開張,意味着煤炭直接液化製油也將商業化運作,反映中國的能源獨立不再是遙不可及的夢想。
減少衝突 避免戰爭
誠然,國際衝突原因多種多樣,如著名政治學家亨廷頓(Samuel Phillips Huntington)把冷戰時期的衝突界定為意識形態的衝突,而後冷戰時期的衝突界定為文明之間的衝突。國際能源政治也認為「石油,10%是經濟,90%是政治」。進攻型現實主義學者,如芝加哥大學政治學教授米爾斯海默(John J. Mear-sheimer)更認為「大國行為背後的首要動機是生存」,主張壓制中國的發展,以免日後陷於被動。但戰爭衝突的爆發始終和能源有着千絲萬縷的關係,在中美兩國的頁岩氣儲量豐富的情況下,當本國能源開採的成本遠低於戰爭,應會極大程度地減少衝突產生的誘因。
「長周期」理論建基於地理大發現之後的歷史,過去的領導者和挑戰者都為了同一種需要而戰,如殖民地、市場、資源、能源或影響力等。中國能源獨立可以在本土解決經濟發展所需要的能源,這將促使新局面誕生:即五百年來,首次出現領導者和挑戰者都毋須拓展生存空間,也毋須防範能源通道受阻。
能源獨立是否可防止戰爭,要留待歷史去回答。目前中國尚處於工業化及城鎮化的發展階段,對於能源的需求依然巨大,不可能完全停止進口能源。加上技術和客觀條件等原因,要實現完全的能源獨立,需要不少時間。但去年中國的能源發展已經提供了可以預期的前景,為「和平崛起」提供有說服力的論據。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Topics

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Mexico: Big Tech and the Police State

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Foreign Media Warn US Brand Reputation Veering toward ‘Collapse’ under Trump Policy Impact

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Hong Kong: What Makes US Trade War More Dangerous than 2008 Crisis: Trump

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump