America Is Delaying Resolution of the North Korean Nuclear Problem

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 22 July 2015
by Lu Chao (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Yuzhi Yang. Edited by Alison Lacey.
Joint talks featuring the U.S., Britain, France, Russia, China, Germany and Iran reached a historic agreement regarding the Iranian nuclear problem on July 14. This agreement proved that discussions are an effective way to resolve differences; it also made one think that resolving the Iran issue could be helpful in resolving the North Korean nuclear issue too.

In the Iran nuclear talks, America’s role was pivotal, exerting the maximum amount of effort. The American government actively negotiated in the Iran nuclear talks, and made an effort to coordinate with China while also respecting many of Iran’s reasonable demands, especially with regard to developing nuclear power plants.

However, when it comes to North Korea’s nuclear problem, America is still acting passively. In the past, America and North Korea have made some contact via the New York channel. But as of two years ago, America stopped contacting North Korea altogether, and even rejected some voluntary contact from North Korea. When the American government allowed the movie "The Interview" to be released, it was seen as a serious insult to North Korean leadership, and the two countries’ relationship entered a highly confrontational stage. The American and South Korean military also held targeted military exercises, such as those with anti-nuclear submarines as a focus; this kind of attack-oriented attitude made North Korea feel further threatened. American tactics not only did not ease the situation, but in fact worsened it in the Korean Peninsula.

In the last two years, America has not actively communicated with other countries about the North Korean nuclear problem, especially not with China. The American delegation leader, who was in charge of the six-party talks, only notified China about the U.S.-Japan-South Korea talks after first communicating with Japan and South Korea.* Nor did America try to renew the six-party talks. As of now, America still acknowledges that these talks are the most important mechanism for solving the North Korean nuclear problem and supports the discussions, which matches China’s stance.

After the Iranian nuclear problem is resolved, the international community should speed up solving the North Korean nuclear problem. Because of America’s passive attitude, and the unsuccessful diplomacy North Korea has had with Southeast Asia, the European Union and Russia in recent years, North Korea may become even more isolated from the international community. North Korea has disregarded China’s stern stance and discouragement of nuclear testing and continued forward. It may be accelerating development of nuclear weapons right now because it wants to engage with the world as a nuclear-enabled country. If America continues to neither contact nor acknowledge North Korea, the country may very well succeed and make the anti-nuclear efforts in the Korean Peninsula more difficult.

Israel has made America treat the Iran problem as a high priority. America is well aware of the North Korean nuclear issue, its threat to the international community and its own safety, which is why it has adjusted its North Korean policies. The North Korean nuclear problem is an urgent one. This year, many grain-producing areas in North Korea have greatly reduced their output, and the subsequent seawater encroachment would bring almost irreversible losses to the area; signs of famine are imminent. This is a good opportunity for the international community to lend help to North Korea. America should take action, stop giving North Korea the silent treatment, and re-establish contact with the country, especially in renewing the humanitarian aid during the six-party talks. The measure will contribute toward restarting the six-party talks and an earlier resolution of the North Korean nuclear problem.

The author is a researcher at the Liaoning Province Korean Peninsula Research Institute

*Editor’s note: The six-party talks, launched in 2003, are aimed at ending North Korea’s nuclear program through negotiations involving China, the United States, North and South Korea, Japan and Russia.


美、英、法、俄、中、德六国与伊朗7月14日达成了历史性的全面解决伊朗核问题的协议。这一协议证明协商谈判是解决核问题行之有效的方式。也令人联想到,伊核问题的解决,能否为朝核问题照亮一线曙光?

  在伊核谈判中,美国的作用举足轻重,在主观上做出了最大努力。美国政府积极参加伊核谈判的斡旋,特别是努力与中国协调。对于伊朗提出的许多正当要求,比如发展核电的问题,给予了尊重。

  但在朝核问题方面,美国仍在采取消极拖延的态度。过去美朝两国通过纽约渠道还有一些接触。两年前开始,美国对朝鲜已 是完全不接触,甚至对来自朝鲜方面的一些主动接触也予以拒绝。特别是美国政府为电影刺杀金正恩放行,在朝方看来,亵渎领袖权威性质很严重,美朝关系因此达 到高度对立状态。美韩军演采取了对朝鲜有针对性的项目,比如类似反核潜艇等内容,这种攻击性的态度令朝鲜进一步感受到了威胁。美国的一系列举动不是缓和朝 鲜半岛局势,反而加剧了朝鲜半岛局势的紧张。

  最近两年,美国与其他国家也没有积极进行沟通,特别是中美沟通显得非常不充分。美国负责六 方会谈的团长,只是在与日韩沟通后,到中国来就美日韩三国谈判的内容向中方做个通报。美国目前也没有积极努力恢复六方会谈的举动。但是从目前来看,美国依 然承认六方会谈是解决朝核问题最重要的机制,也支持恢复六方会谈,这一点与中国立场一致。

  伊核问题解决后,国际社会应当加紧把解决朝核问题提到议事日程上来。由于美国对朝鲜所采取的消极态度,加上近两年来,朝鲜对东南亚、对欧盟,包括对俄罗斯的 外交都不是特别顺利,可能令朝鲜更加走向封闭,孤立于国际社会的道路。特别是在发展核武器问题上,朝鲜不顾中方对朝鲜半岛无核化的坚定态度和劝阻,坚决进 行核试验。现在朝鲜很可能正在加紧核开发武器化的进度,其目的就是想以核拥有国的身份与国际社会打交道。如果美国继续对朝鲜继续采取不接触不理睬的态度, 朝鲜的目的很有可能达成,令朝鲜半岛的无核化进程更加艰难。

  以色列问 题的存在,令美国把解决伊核问题放在一个很高的位置。朝核问题对国际社会和美国安全构成的潜在威胁,美国心里非常清楚,它也一直在调整对朝政策。朝核问题 当前迫在眉睫。今年,朝鲜的黄海南道、黄海北道、平安南道等中部产粮区大面积减产,随后的海水倒灌给该地区造成的损失几乎不可逆,饥荒征兆正在显现。这正 是国际社会对朝鲜施以援手的好时机。美国应当行动起来,放弃对朝鲜不闻不问的态度,恢复与朝鲜方面的接触,特别是恢复六方会谈时期对朝鲜的人道主义援助。 这将有助于六方会谈的再次重启和朝核问题的早日解决。(作者是辽东学院辽宁省朝鲜半岛研究基地研究员)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Topics

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?