In the Best Interest of Our Nation: Four Points for Trump To Address

Published in El Universal
(Mexico) on 23 December 2016
by Carlos Heredia Zubieta (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jared Martin. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
What do Mexicans want from Trump? Do we want to confront him, to negotiate with him, to adapt ourselves to his intentions, or some sort of combination of all those things?

The first thing we need to do is determine our nation’s best interest. While we are not sure about his nature or reach, our secretariat of the economy would advise something along the lines of “the priority is the defense of NAFTA.” Foreign Affairs will say “it’s imperative we protect Mexicans abroad.” National Defense will say “it’s important to safeguard national security and the borders, as compartmentalized forces and not as a coherent and consistent strategy.” How best to ensure synergy? Let’s take a look:

1. Diagnosis: How do we best assemble the separate parts of the Mexican state? A discussion needs to be had between the three powers of the Union, between civilians and the military, state and local governments, among businessmen, laborers, academics, churches, civic organizations, and Mexicans abroad. A top-down summons is not enough, it’s more apt to organize from the bottom up.

2. Negotiate: What does Trump want with Mexico? Knowing our interlocutor is crucial. What do we want to happen? We should put our agenda on the table. Trump is highly unpredictable, but there is some consistency in his conduct: He values know-how and is focused on compromise when it comes to business. He knows his strengths and makes it clear he will make use of them in the long run. He quite naturally sees to it that all aspects of his interactions defend his interests. He doesn’t fear nationalism; he considers it a logical path for every country to follow. What does he think with respect to Enrique Peña Nieto?

3. Be dignified: The fact that Slim and Videgaray have channels of communication to Trump’s world hasn’t resulted in us being treated any better.* If we maintain a dignified position, sustained by our own people, he will listen to us. If we yield to him, he will humiliate us and unilaterally impose his agenda upon us. It’s essential that we are clear and concise when it comes to non-negotiable issues and who our allies are in the United States.

4. The reason of State: It’s not about defending the status quo, but about converting our country into a habitable one. It’s not about collecting and defending treaties as a means to an end, but investing in our own people. It’s not about betting on generous concessions from our neighbors, but rather liberating Mexicans from the chains of ignorance and unproductivity.

A dialogue is already underway between Mexico and the necessary interlocutors. Juan Pablo Castañón is increasing his contacts in the U.S. Chamber of Commerce here in Mexico and in the states. José Luis Gutiérrez is gathering binational Michoacanos in an effort to put our heads together and get on the same page. Alexandra Haas is calling together churches in the two nations on behalf of the National Council to Prevent Discrimination. Jesús Campos, as a member of FIDES,** is pushing for investment in the businesses of returned migrants to boost the economies in their communities of origin. Jill Anderson and Marggie Loredo, by way of the Office of Detainee Affairs, and Rebeca Vargas and Raúl Rodríguez Barocio via the U.S. Mexico Foundation and the Monterrey Institute of Technology, are promoting a binational dialogue between young leaders in the two countries. Sergio López Ayllón, the dean of the Center for Research and Teaching in Economics in Mexico City, is calling for a strengthening of academic cooperation with universities in the U.S., and Blanca Heredia and Mónica Jacobo, also from CIDE, are promoting more inclusion of deportees in education and labor.

This political environment we are living in is unprecedented. We should take advantage of the uproar Trump triggered and imagine an inclusive country, open to the world, but sustained by our own creativity and innovation, with unparalleled alliances in this time of great uncertainty. I refuse to accept things as they are. If we always continue doing the same thing, we will only reap the same poor results that we’ve already come to be familiar with.

*Editor’s note: These names refer to Carlos Slim, a Mexican business magnate, investor and philanthropist, and Luis Videgaray, a Mexican politician who served as secretary of finance and public credit in the cabinet of Enrique Pena Nieto from 2012-2016.

**Editor’s note: FIDES stands for Federacion Interamericana de Empresas de Seguros, a Mexican insurance company.


¿Qué queremos los mexicanos con Trump? ¿Queremos confrontarlo, negociar con él,

acomodarnos a sus intenciones, o una combinación de todas las anteriores?

Lo primero es definir el interés nacional. Mientras no tengamos clara su naturaleza y

alcances, Economía dirá por aquí: “la prioridad es la defensa del TLCAN”; Relaciones

Exteriores dirá por acá: “el imperativo es la protección de los mexicanos en el exterior”;

Defensa y Marina dirán por allá: “la salvaguarda de la seguridad nacional y de las fronteras,

como esfuerzos compartimentados y no como una estrategia coherente y consistente”.

¿Cómo favorecer sinergias? Veamos:

1. Diagnóstico. ¿Cómo articular las piezas del Estado mexicano? Se necesita el concurso

de los tres poderes de la Unión; de civiles y militares; estados y municipios; empresarios,

trabajadores, academia, iglesias, organismos de la sociedad civil, y mexicanos en el

exterior. No basta una convocatoria cupular, es preciso articular desde abajo hacia arriba.

2. Negociación. ¿Qué quiere Trump con México? Conocer a nuestro interlocutor es crucial.

¿Qué queremos nosotros que ocurra? —debemos poner nuestra agenda sobre la mesa.

Trump es altamente impredecible, pero su conducta registra constantes: valora la

habilidad empresarial y tiene un enfoque transaccional sobre los negocios; conoce sus

fortalezas y deja claro que las hará valer a lo largo de todo el proceso; ve de manera

natural que cada parte defienda su propio interés. No le teme al nacionalismo; lo

considera el camino lógico a seguir por cada país. ¿Qué piensa al respecto EPN?

3. Dignidad. El hecho de que Slim y Videgaray tengan canales de comunicación en el

entorno de Trump no llevará a que él nos trate mejor. Si mantenemos una posición digna,

sustentada en nuestra propia gente, nos va a escuchar; si nos arrodillamos, nos va a

humillar y a imponer unilateralmente su agenda. Es fundamental tener claridad sobre los

temas no negociables, así como las fichas de negociación y los aliados con que contamos

en EU.

4. La razón de Estado. No es defender el statu quo, sino convertir al nuestro en un país

habitable. No es coleccionar y defender tratados como un fin en sí mismos, sino invertir en

nuestra propia gente. No es apostarle a generosas concesiones de nuestros vecinos, sino

liberar a los mexicanos de las ataduras de la ignorancia y la improductividad.

Ya está en curso un diálogo entre nosotros mismos y con interlocutores cruciales. Juan

Pablo Castañón multiplica contactos con la Cámara Americana de Comercio aquí y allá.

José Luis Gutiérrez reúne a michoacanos binacionales para pensar juntos. Alexandra

Haas convoca desde Conapred a la conversación entre las iglesias de aquí y de allá. Jesús

Campos desde Fides impulsa la inversión de migrantes retornados en las empresas de la

economía social en sus comunidades de origen. Jill Anderson y Maggie Loredo desde

ODA, y Rebeca Vargas y Raúl Rodríguez Barocio desde la Fundación México-Estados

Unidos (USMF) y el Tecnológico de Monterrey, promueven el diálogo binacional de jóvenes

líderes. Sergio López Ayllón desde el CIDE llama a fortalecer la cooperación académica

con las universidades de allá, y Blanca Heredia y Mónica Jacobo, también desde el CIDE,

promueven la inserción educativa y laboral de los deportados.

Vivimos un momento político fuera de lo común. Aprovechemos el sismo desatado por

Trump para imaginar un país incluyente, abierto al mundo, pero sustentado en nuestra

creatividad e innovación, con alianzas inéditas en un escenario de alta incertidumbre. Yo

me niego a aceptar las cosas como están. Si seguimos haciendo lo mismo de siempre,

tendremos los magros resultados que ya conocemos.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Turmoil in Los Angeles: Key Test of Trump’s Power

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Topics

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Germany: Peace Report 2025: No Common Ground with Trump

Related Articles

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Israel: The President Who Forgot History: Trump Blames Biden for Wave of Antisemitism

Poland: Donald Trump — Elon Musk’s Worst Investment Yet

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations