Trump Is Stranger Than Fiction

Published in El observador
(Uruguay) on 5 August 2018
by Luis Roux (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Tom Walker. Edited by Barbara Finkemeyer.
The president of the United States uses techniques from the Theater of the Absurd in the creation of his persona. It’s fascinating, in spite of everything.

"I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose voters." Donald Trump said this, quite clearly, in the middle of the election campaign that carried him to the presidency of the most powerful country on the planet.

He was referring to the loyalty of his followers; he made the claim onstage before thousands of them, as if to say: no matter what I do, and no matter what I say, you are going to vote for me because you know what’s right. At the same time, he was also laughing in his opponents’ faces: no matter what you do, and no matter what you say, it’s not going to stop me.

His bragging turned out to be accurate, in large part thanks to a campaign of dissemination of false news items showing the “true” face of his opponent. Nevertheless, he succeeded, by means of an overwhelming persistence, in pinning the expression “fake news media” on the communications media that were trying to use common sense investigation and analysis of the facts.

Who would dare to propose such a character in a work of fiction? There have been several attempts. Among the most similar is Ubu, for whom French writer Alfred Jarry’s play “Ubu Roi” is named. Ubu is a sinister tyrant and a doctor of “pataphysics,” a discipline that apparently seeks to establish the absurd in the universe. For its part, the Trump administration, with great pataphysical depth, denies the most obvious facts, argues that truth is a relative concept, and that, contrary to reality, “alternative facts” exist.

Trump is much more like King Ubu than he is like Frank Underwood, the unscrupulous protagonist of the series “House of Cards.” Underwood carries traditional techniques of deception to the extreme. Trump, on the other hand, breaks new ground, using the rhetoric of leaders like Kim Jong Un of North Korea and Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines.

His preferred way of escaping from a scandal is to create another, even bigger, scandal. When it appears that he is getting backed into a corner by a problem, he opens up an even more tempting target for his opponents. Faced with the explosion of denunciations from the media, he reacts, accusing them of being “enemies of the American people.”

Every time he leaves the United States, he causes an international conflict. It’s something that fascinates him. He hasn’t missed a single opportunity to disparage the country’s European allies and its neighbor, Canada, while he has very much enjoyed his meetings with the strong men of North Korea and Russia.

During the interminable election campaign, he was master of the spectacle. Since becoming president, he has carried this to an even greater extent. He has succeeded in dividing the people of the United States more than ever, to the extent that it doesn’t matter if what he does is good or bad. What matters is whether you are with him or against him.

There is something that Trump understands very well, and that he has taken to extremes, which would have been unthinkable until now: The bad guy is a very attractive character. The U.S. president is doing many unnecessary things to maintain his status as a bad guy — his sympathy with Nazis, the deportations that separate parents and children, and the choosing the worst people for the most important government offices.

At this stage, it seems evident that there is a method to the absurdity in Trump’s strategy. It is “coldly calculated” as the celebrated character Chespirito* would say. What puzzles me is his relationship with Vladimir Putin.

It is clear that the Russian helped him win the election, but normally Trump would now be trying to distance himself from Putin or send inconsistent signals to confuse the people or wear them down, as he has done in so many other situations. However, he has not done that. On the contrary, he has instead expressed his admiration and affection for the Russian leader in various ways.

Just like the great characters of literature and film, Trump has been keeping audiences around the world on the edge of their seats. What is uncomfortable is the fact that we share the plot with him; even though we close the book or change the channel, he will still be lurking there.

*Editor’s note: Chespirito was the stage name of Roberto Gomez Bolanos (1929-2014), a popular Spanish-language author, comedian, and director from Mexico.


Trump supera a la ficción
El presidente de Estados Unidos usa técnicas del teatro del absurdo en la creación de su propio personaje. Es fascinante a pesar de todo

Puedo pararme en la mitad de la 5ª Avenida y pegarle un tiro a alguien, que igual no voy a perder votos". Lo dijo Donald Trump, claro, en medio de una campaña electoral que lo llevó a la presidencia del país más poderoso del planeta.

Se refería a la lealtad de sus seguidores y lo decía en un estrado frente a miles de ellos, como si dijera: "Haga lo que haga y diga lo que diga, ustedes me van a votar, porque saben lo que es bueno". Y de paso también se reía en la cara de sus adversarios: "Hagan lo que hagan y digan lo que digan, no me van a detener".

El alarde resultó certero, en gran parte gracias a un procedimiento de diseminación de noticias falsas que mostraban la "verdadera" cara de su adversaria. Sin embargo, logró, mediante una insistencia abrumadora, endilgarle la expresión fake news media (prensa de noticias falsas) a los medios de prensa que intentaban la cordura, la investigación y el análisis de los hechos.

¿Quién se atrevería a postular semejante personaje en una obra de ficción? Ha habido varios intentos. Uno de los que más se le parece es Ubú, el que da nombre a la obra de teatro Ubú Rey, del francés Alfred Jarry.

Ubú es un tirano muy malvado que además es gran doctor en patafísica, una disciplina que a todas luces pretende instaurar el absurdo en el universo. La administración Trump, por su parte, con gran hondura patafísica, niega los hechos más evidentes y esgrime que la verdad es un concepto relativo y que, contra los hechos, existen "hechos alternativos".

Trump es mucho más parecido al rey Ubú que a Frank Underwood, el inescrupuloso protagonista de la serie House of Cards. Underwood lleva los métodos tradicionales del engaño hasta el extremo. Trump, en cambio, abre nuevos caminos y usa la retórica de líderes como el norcoreano Kim Jong-un o el filipino Rodrigo Duterte.

Su forma preferida de escaparse de un escándalo es crear otro mayor. Cuando parece que está acorralado por un problema, abre un flanco todavía más promisorio para sus adversarios, y ante la explosión de denuncias de los medios, reacciona acusándolos de "enemigos del pueblo americano".

Cada vez que sale de Estados Unidos crea un conflicto internacional. Es algo que le fascina. No ha desaprovechado ninguna oportunidad de despreciar a sus aliados europeos y a su vecino Canadá, en tanto que se lo ha visto muy a gusto en sus reuniones con los hombres fuertes de Corea del Norte y de Rusia.

Durante la interminable campaña electoral fue el rey del espectáculo y desde que es presidente lo ha sido todavía más. Ha logrado dividir al pueblo estadounidense más que nunca, de tal manera que no importa si lo que hace está bien o está mal. Lo que importa es si estás con él o contra él.

Hay algo que Trump entiende muy bien y que ha llevado a límites hasta ahora inconcebibles: el malo es un personaje muy atractivo. Hay muchas cosas innecesarias que hace el presidente de Estados Unidos para mantener el estatus de villano: su simpatía con los nazis, las deportaciones que separan a padres e hijos, la elección de las peores personas para ocupar los cargos más importantes de gobierno.

A esta altura parece evidente que el absurdo en la estrategia de Trump tiene un método, está "fríamente calculado", como diría el célebre personaje de Chespirito. Lo que me tiene perplejo es su relación con Vladimir Putin.

Está claro que el ruso lo ayudó a ganar las elecciones, pero lo normal sería que ahora Trump intentara desmarcarse o que diera señales incoherentes para confundir y aburrir al público, como ha hecho en tantos otros casos. Sin embargo no lo ha hecho sino que, por el contrario, ha expresado de diversas formas su admiración y afecto por el líder ruso.

Tal como sucede como los grandes personajes de la literatura y el cine, Trump mantiene en vilo a los espectadores del mundo entero. Lo incómodo es el hecho de que compartamos la trama con él, que aunque cerremos el libro o cambiemos de canal, seguirá al acecho.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness