Trump and Fox: Much More Than Friends

Published in El Pais
(Spain) on 26th August 2018
by Sandro Pozzi (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Stephen Routledge. Edited by Barbara Finkemeyer .
The network, an audience leader, attacks other media outlets to defend the U.S. president.

The opening of Studio F at Fox News on Avenue of the Americas in New York coincided with the presidential election. It cost $30 million. The square that can be seen from its windows was a hotbed of activity that night. Donald Trump supporters flocked there in order to celebrate. It was an island in hostile territory. “The victory of the deplorables,” they shouted when Hillary Clinton accepted defeat.

Last Tuesday – the darkest day of his presidency – was just like any other for Fox News. Michael Cohen's guilty plea, which implicated the president in an illegal campaign funding campaign, was not news for the network. The same was true when former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort was convicted of fraud. Fox devoted its headlines to a student killed by an immigrant who entered this country without legal documentation.

Fox News bet heavily on Trump long before he was nominated, and the network is much more than a friend to the president. It is the most influential political machine in the country, with agitators standing in front of its cameras. Rupert Murdoch created the Fox News Channel two decades ago with the specific intention of giving voice to conservatives and avoiding progressive reporters.

The standard-bearer of the resistance is Sean Hannity. He completely failed to mention that Cohen had implicated Trump, and instead attacked the liberal media. “They hate him,” he explained. Hannity’s program has 3.4 million viewers, along with his three-hour radio program and 3.7 million followers on Twitter. The news team is supported by Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham.

Cohen's statement was sold as being “100 percent political.” “Scandalous,” Ingraham lamented.*

“The liberal media are getting carried away by hysteria,” insisted Hannity, “pure persecution.”*

“Despite the joy coming out of CNN and MSNBC,” said the all-rounder Geraldo Rivera, “I remind you that Paul Manafort was the target of the investigation because he worked for the campaign.”**

This is the strategy Ainsley Earhardt pursued in the interview broadcast on Thursday on “Fox & Friends,” the most highly watched morning program with 1.4 million viewers.*** The host had the opportunity to have the president clarify the situation, but instead she hugged him and asked him about things like a memo he had given to his administration, and allowed him to complain about Cohen's allegation.

That the cameras chose to look the other way was predictable. Trump and Fox feed each other. Some 60 percent of Republicans identify the channel as the news media they most trust. For 20 percent of Democrats, the most trustworthy station is CNN. And while the majority of voters think the president should be impeached, nine out of 10 Fox News followers approve of his leadership of the country.

According to the Nielsen ratings, the station is a clear leader in audience share with 2.4 million viewers during prime time, 14 percent more than a year ago. It exceeds MSNBC’s 1.6 million viewers, with CNN making up the remaining share. Fans of Fox do not see interference in the election as a serious problem, and 85 percent of respondents believe that the Russia investigation is a witch hunt.

Fox News propaganda is reinforced through local television and Fox Business Network. (watched by more viewers than CNBC and Bloomberg News). On the latter program, Neil Cavuto has created a sense of alarmism. “You don’t prevent a constitutional crisis by threatening a financial one,” he warned, referring to the consequences of a forced Trump exit, adding, “The longest bull market in history just could be history.”

The coverage was accompanied by a poll which indicated that 36 percent of Americans are inclined toward a “socialistic” system, twice as many as in 2010. Cavuto’s words were accompanied by images of riots in Venezuela. "I hope we don’t have to eat the animals in the zoos.”****

*Editor’s note: Although accurately translated, Ingraham’s quoted remark could not be independently verified.

**Editor’s note: Rivera’s original tweet was: “Remember-despite the glee emanating from #CNN & #MSNBC-nothing in the @PaulManafort trial or guilty verdict on the tax charges has to do with @realDonaldTrump Except for the fact that he was targeted because he later worked for the Trump campaign.”

***Editor’s note: According to the Nielsen TV ratings, as of Jan. 30, 2018, “Fox & Friends” was the most-watched cable news program in its time slot.

**** Editor’s note: The actual quote from Cavuto’s program was made by Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig, who stated, “Of course, look at Venezuela, they’re eating the zoo animals. My God, I hope it doesn’t come to that.”



El estudio F de Fox News en la Avenida de las Américas de Nueva York se inauguró coincidiendo con las elecciones. Costó 30 millones de dólares (25,8 millones de euros). La plaza que se ve tras sus cristaleras era un hervidero aquella noche. Allí acudieron los simpatizantes de Donald Trump en masa para celebrar. Era una isla en territorio hostil. “La victoria de los deplorables”, gritaban cuando Hillary Clinton aceptó la derrota.
El martes pasado, el día más oscuro en su presidencia, fue como cualquier otro para Fox News. La declaración de culpabilidad de Michael Cohen, que implicaba al presidente en una trama de financiación ilegal de su campaña, no fue noticia en la cadena. Tampoco que el antiguo director de su campaña, Paul Manafort, fuera declarado culpable de fraude. Las alarmas las dedicaban a una estudiante asesinada por un indocumentado.
Fox News apostó fuerte por Trump desde bastante antes de ser nominado. Es mucho más que la televisión amiga del presidente. Es la maquinaria política más influyente del país, que tiene ante sus cámaras a agitadores que lo llevan en volandas. Rupert Murdoch creó la cadena hace dos décadas precisamente para dar voz a los conservadores y esquivar a los periodistas progresistas.
El abanderado de la resistencia es Sean Hannity. Omitió por completo contar que Cohen implicaba a Trump y en su lugar atacó de los medios liberales. “Le odian”, justificaba. Su programa lo siguen 3,4 millones de abonados. Lo combina con tres horas de radio y 3,7 millones de seguidores en Twitter. El equipo informativo lo refuerzan Tucker Carlson y Laura Graham.
La declaración de Michael Cohen la vendieron como “cien por cien política”. “Escandaloso”, lamentaba Graham. “Los medios liberales vuelven a dejarse llevar por la histeria”, insistía Hannity, “pura persecución”. “Pese a la alegría que emana de la CNN y de la MSNBC”, decía el todoterreno Geraldo Rivera, “os recuerdo que Paul Manafort fue objetivo de la investigación porque trabajó para la campaña”.
Es la táctica que siguió Ainsley Earhard en la entrevista que emitió el jueves Fox & Friends. Es el programa más visto en la mañana, con 1,4 millones de espectadores. La presentadora tuvo la oportunidad de hacer que el presidente fuera claro sobre la situación. Pero en su lugar le abrazó preguntándole por cosas como la nota que daba a su gestión o dejándole que se quejara por la acusación de Cohen.
Que sus cámaras optaran por mirar hacia otro lado era predecible. Trump y Fox se retroalimentan. El 60% de los republicanos identifica a la cadena como el medio en el que más confían. Para los demócratas la más fiable es CNN, con el 20%. Y mientras la mayoría de los electores suspende al presidente, nueve de cada diez seguidores de Fox News aprueban su gestión al frente del país.
La cadena es líder clara en audiencia, según la medición de Nielsen de julio, con 2,4 millones de televidentes en prime time, un 14% más que hace un año. Supera los 1,6 millones de MSNBC. La CNN tiene una tercera parte. Los fans de la Fox no ven la interferencia en las elecciones como un problema serio y el 85% de los encuestados opina que la investigación de la trama rusa es una caza de brujas.
La propaganda de Fox News se refuerza con las televisiones locales y Fox Business News, más vista que la CNBC y Bloomberg. Desde ahí Neil Cavuto creaba alarmismo. “No se previene una crisis constitucional amenazando con crear una financiera”, advertía en referencia a las consecuencias que podría tener una salida forzada de Trump, “la remontada más larga de la historia en Wall Street será historia”.
La cobertura la aderezaba con una encuesta en la que mostraba que el 36% de los estadounidenses se inclinan por un sistema “socialista”, el doble que en 2010. Sus palabras se cubrían con imágenes de disturbios en Venezuela, “espero que no tengamos que comernos los animales de los zoológicos”.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness