How Long Can the Fire of Populism Burn in the US?

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 30 September 2018
by Zheng Xi Ran (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Daniel Chow. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
In recent years, populism has been all the rage in the U.S. and Europe, and has become a unique phenomenon in Western politics and society. From the U.S. “Occupy Wall Street” movement to the rise of the tea party, from the British Brexit referendum to the election of Donald Trump in the U.S., the soul of populism has been moving back and forth between the coasts on both sides of the Atlantic. Most attention-grabbing of all, would probably be the surprising events in the United States.

Many people believe that Trump’s election and the current wave of populism in the U.S. is a black swan event, but in reality, it is not.* By examining trends and realities in U.S. politics, its economy and social developments, it can be seen that populism has always been an approaching gray rhino ignored by the mainstream elite.* The consolidation of the U.S. populist ideological trend reflects the feelings of disappointment, disenfranchisement and insecurity of blue-collar, lower middle class whites. More importantly, it reflects the growing imbalance and unfairness in the distribution of wealth within the U.S. For decades, the phenomenon of the “rich get richer and the poor get poorer” in the U.S. has worsened. In 1981, the average annual income of the top 1 percent of adults was 27 times that of the adult income of the bottom 50 percent. Today, that figure is now as high as 81 percent, and the population of those living in extreme poverty is nearly double that 20 years ago. In the 2008 financial crisis, ordinary people had to pay taxes in order to bail out the disaster caused by the Wall Street elite.

Currently, the political forces that have appeared in the American populist wave are showing their power. They have released a series of extremely controversial so-called new policies, flaunting “America First,” drafting a “Muslim ban” and implementing political conservatism and economic nationalism. They have withdrawn from many international associations, broken treaties and sparked trade wars everywhere, bringing great instability and uncertainty to the world. They cause the outside world much concern, but their national support ratings are comparatively stable.

However, history has proven time and again that populism is a two-edged sword, capable of both harming others and oneself. It must not be forgotten that although public morale can be manipulated, it is like flowing water that can both float a boat or sink it. Should one who comes to power based on popular opinion act and behave in a manner that breaks away from the true needs of the population, he shall in the end be consumed by that same popular opinion and buried by history.

There is no lack of such examples throughout history. During the French Revolution, after the Jacobins led by Robespierre came to power, they unleashed a reign of terror and were soon abandoned by all, with Robespierre himself being sent to the guillotine. Under the banner of the people, the Nazis in Germany implemented dictatorial rule, brazenly starting World War II and meeting with shameful defeat, bringing unprecedented disaster to Germany and the whole world. In recent U.S. history, be it the anti-modernization movement of the People’s Party during the latter part of the 19th century, or the racially-toned populist movements of the 1960s, all came and went in haste, lasting only for a fleeting moment.

Populists will say that popular opinion is the essence, but what is true popular opinion in this day and age? From the perspective of the international situation, it is the voice of peace, development, cooperation, win-win situations. From the aspect of contemporary trends, it is to comply with the will of the people in order to lead a good life and to respect the right of the people of every nation to pursue such a good life. A nation, a people that wants to reverse the decline of its national fortune and to truly prosper must advance within the progressive logic of history, develop according to the developmental trend of the period, proceed from the basic and long-term interests of the people and lead responsibly or it will be battered and bruised. The fire from the stalk of populism may be smoldering hot for now, but it will turn to ashes in the end.

The author is an observer of international issues.

*Editor’s note: The black swan theory or theory of black swan events is a metaphor that describes an event that comes as a surprise, has a major effect and may be rationalized after the fact with the benefit of hindsight. Gray rhinos is a term used to describe obvious dangers that are often ignored.


近年来,民粹主义在美国和欧洲大行其道,已成为西方政治、社会中的独特现象。从美国的“占领华尔街”运动到“茶党”的兴起,从英国的公投“脱欧”到美国特朗普的上台,一个民粹主义的幽灵正在跨大西洋两岸徘徊。而这其中,尤为引人关注的,恐怕还是发生在美国的魑魅怪象。

  很多人认为,特朗普的上台和美国当前的民粹主义是突如其来的“黑天鹅”,实则不然。考察近年美国政治、经济、社会发展的轨迹和现实,可以看出,民粹主义实际上是一头渐行渐近但被主流精英忽视的“灰犀牛”。美国民粹主义思潮集中反映了中下阶层白人蓝领的失落感、被剥削感还有不安全感,更重要的是,它折射出美国国内日益严重的分配失衡和不公平问题。数十年来,美国的“富者愈富、贫者愈贫”现象变本加厉。1981年,最顶层1%的成年人平均收入是底层50%的成年人收入的27倍,而今天更高达81倍,极端贫困人口几乎是20年前的两倍。2008年金融危机中,普通民众还不得不纳税为华尔街精英酿成的这场灾难纾困。

  目前,在美国民粹浪潮里登场的政治势力正在展示其“威力”。他们出台了一系列极具争议的所谓“新政”,标榜“美国优先”“美国第一”,制定“禁穆令”,推行政治保守主义和经济民族主义。在国际上频频退群、毁约,四处点燃贸易战火,给世界带来了巨大的不稳定性和不确定性。令外界不无担忧的是,他们的国内支持率甚至还较为稳固。

  然而,历史一再证明,民粹主义是一把双刃剑,既能砍向别人,也会伤及自己。不要忘记,民气固然可用,但民意如流水,水可载舟,亦可覆舟。携民意上台者,如果所作所为脱离了民众的真正需求,背离了民众的根本利益,最终会被民意所反噬,为历史所埋葬。前车之鉴,史不乏例。法国大革命时期,以罗伯斯庇尔为首的雅各宾派执政后,大搞恐怖政治,不久便众叛亲离,罗本人被送上断头台。德国纳粹打着人民的旗号,推行独裁统治,悍然发动第二次世界大战,遭到可耻失败,给德国和全世界带来空前劫难。美国近代史上,无论是19世纪后期反现代化的人民党运动,还是20世纪60年代种族主义色彩的民粹运动,均来去匆匆,昙花一现而已。

  民粹主义者言必称“以民意为精粹”,但当今时代的真正民意是什么呢?从国际大势来讲,就是和平、发展、合作、共赢的呼声,从时代潮流来讲,就是顺应人民对美好生活的向往,尊重每一个国家的人民追求这种美好生活的权利。一个国家、一个民族要想扭转国运衰败,真正振兴,都必须在历史前进的逻辑中前进,在时代发展的潮流中发展,从人民的根本和长远利益出发,以负责任态度施政,否则必然会碰得头破血流。民粹主义的稻草之火虽然可能热腾一时,但最终不得不归为余烬。(作者是国际问题观察员)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Topics

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Germany: Peace Report 2025: No Common Ground with Trump

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Israel: The President Who Forgot History: Trump Blames Biden for Wave of Antisemitism

Poland: Donald Trump — Elon Musk’s Worst Investment Yet