US and China Must Avoid 'Thucydidean Trap'

Published in The People's Daily
(China) on 5 July 2013
by Sun Zhe (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nathan Hsu. Edited by Bora Mici.
The Peloponnesian War brought previously untold tragedy to humanity, and Thucydides thus described the reason for its outbreak: The relationship between Athens and Sparta had always been one of healthy competition, but the growth and expansion of Athenian power drew the envy of Sparta and the ire of several other city-states. In the end, increased fear and misunderstanding ultimately led the two sides into armed conflict.

Today, to avoid the pitfalls of this "Thucydidean trap" between emerging and established powers, humanity must seek out and pave a path for coexistence, with lasting peace and collective prosperity. And as an important institution and platform for establishing a new great power relationship in the 21st century, the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue could be said to have created a new model, a new paradigm within international relations.

Since its inception in 2009, the U.S. and China have engaged in bilateral communications on strategic, long-term and far-reaching issues regarding the development of relations between the two countries. Agreements have been reached on 324 items since the mechanism for dialogue was established. In strategic negotiations, both sides have made headway on over 100 items, promptly moving forward with new mechanisms for exchange such as the U.S.-China Asia-Pacific Consultations, consultations on Middle Eastern affairs, a new round of the U.S.-China Strategic Security Dialogue, talks on multilateral arms control and nonproliferation, and practical military cooperation and exchange. On the track of economic dialogue, preliminary figures cite over 218 agreements reached, bringing concrete benefits to the people of both countries and lending momentum to the development of a new great power relationship between the U.S. and China. Because Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Barack Obama recently found common ground at their first meeting not long ago, the fifth round of the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue — about to commence in Washington — will consolidate that consensus with concrete results and encourage decisions on important topics such as North Korean nuclear weapons and the state of the region, cybersecurity, climate change, trade and the economy, and the relationship between the countries' militaries.

Judging by the amount of preparation that has preceded it, the fifth round of talks will have been worth the wait. The U.S. and China have already made new headway in strategic and economic cooperation. Recently, the situation on the Korean Peninsula has been relatively stable: There has been close interaction within the U.S.-China Working Group, and military exchange has become more frequent. On trade and the economy, the U.S. and China have already reached a preliminary consensus on over 90 items and will move for greater detail and integration during official talks. In this fifth round of dialogue, the U.S. and China will enter into negotiations on a bilateral investment treaty, coordinate financial policies and the opening of markets, and discuss policy proposals such as energy savings, cutting back on emissions, energy resource cooperation and economic cooperation on a local level. These talks will not only contribute to the economic implications of this new type of great power relationship, but will likely also have a significant impact on the direction of both countries' economic policies in the future. The income and spending power of the Chinese people is expected to continue to climb, and ordinary people will also be able to reap the dividends of the talks.

The U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue has matured, but it cannot be denied that a divide remains between the two sides' understanding of things relating to the term "strategic." Several prominent U.S. politicians still hope to change the platform for dialogue into a negotiating mechanism for the U.S. to head off crises and a pressure transmitter for "resolving real issues," demanding that China move according to U.S. wishes in a multitude of areas. Accordingly, there are questions we must tackle head-on: how to keep everything balanced domestically, hasten the democratization of and foster a scientific approach to related policies, and flexibly utilize various diplomatic tools to adequately ensure the realization of China's national interests. When it comes down to it, we will still have to rely on ourselves for the sustainable growth of China's economy and the stability of our society. Although the U.S. is overbearing on many issues, bilateral talks have been largely transformed from the attack-and-defense nature of earlier days, and the language of both the U.S. and China has gradually become more balanced.

Due to the lack of historical precedent, of course, the two countries are still in the process of exploring this new great power relationship. However, any positive outcome has the potential to become a fulcrum with which the fullest extent of cooperation between the two countries may be promoted, in the interests of safeguarding their own interests as well as the common good of the international community. The U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue has already demonstrated the political savviness and diplomatic finesse of both sides, and we can expect the conservative country to continue the search for a new answer to that age-old problem: the intersection of an emerging power with an established one, and the avoidance of a "Thucydidean trap."

The author is a professor, doctoral advisor, and director of the Tsinghua University Center for U.S.-China Relations.


  伯罗奔尼撒战争曾给人类带来空前悲剧,修昔底德曾这样解释其最终爆发的原因:雅典和斯巴达之间本来一直是健康的竞争关系,但是随着雅典实力的增强和对外扩张,引起了斯巴达的妒忌和一些城邦的不满。恐惧和误解的增长使得双方最终兵戎相见。

  今天,在新兴大国和守成大国之间,为避免“修昔底德陷阱”,人类必须努力寻求和建设持久和平、共同繁荣的共存之道。而作为构建21世纪新型大国关系的重要制度设计和沟通平台,中美战略与经济对话可谓开创了国际关系的新模式、新典范。

  自2009年启动以来,中美双方已就事关两国关系发展的战略性、长期性、全局性问题进行了虚实结合的四轮对话。对话机制建成以来,两国已经达成324项成果。在战略对话轨道,双方达成约上百项具体成果,及时启动了中美亚太事务磋商、中美中东事务磋商、中美新一轮战略安全磋商、多边军控与防扩散磋商及两军务实交流合作等新型交流机制。在经济对话轨道,两国达成的成果初步统计高达218项,给两国人民带来实实在在的利益,为发展中美新型大国关系注入强劲动力。由于不久前中国国家主席习近平与美国总统奥巴马的元首会晤刚达成共识,即将于美国华盛顿召开的中美第五轮战略与经济对话会以具体成果来巩固共识,进一步落实朝核及地区形势、网络安全、应对气候变化、经济与贸易及两军关系等重大议题。

  从前期准备情况看,第五轮中美对话相当值得期待。此前,中美双方在战略与经济方面的合作已经取得了全新进展,近期朝鲜半岛形势相对稳定、中美网络安全工作小组密切互动、两军交流更加频繁。在经济和贸易领域,中美已初步达成90多项共识,将在正式会谈中进一步细化和整合。第五轮中美对话,中美将就双方投资协定进行磋商,就双方在市场开放及金融政策进行协调、商讨节能减排及能源合作、地方层级的经济合作等政策主张。这些对话,不仅会继续充实新型大国关系的经济内涵,还可能在很大程度上影响两国今后经济政策的走向。中国国民收入和支出能力有望得到进一步提高,普通民众也能享受对话的“红利”。

  中美两国间的战略与经济对话已渐入佳境,但不能否认,双方对有关“战略性”的理解依然有所差异,一些美国政要仍然企望把对话平台变作美国“预防危机”的对华谈判机制和“解决实际问题”的压力传输器,要求中国在诸多领域按照美国的意愿行事。因此,如何坚持国内综合协调,促进相关决策民主化、科学化;怎样灵活运用多种外交手段,以充分保证中国国家利益的实现,是我们必须正视研究的问题。说到底,中国经济的可持续增长和社会的稳定最终还要靠我们自己。美方虽然在诸多问题上咄咄逼人,但是双方对话的攻防态势已经有了很大转换,中美话语权逐渐走向平衡。

  当然,由于缺乏足够的历史经验支撑,中美两国对新型大国关系的塑造,仍然处在探索过程中。不过,任何积极的成果都可以转化成重要支点,推进两国为维护各自国家利益和共同国际利益进行最大限度的合作。中美战略与经济对话已经显示出两国的政治智慧和外交能力,期待他们继续为新兴大国和守成大国相遇的老问题,寻找新的答案,避免“修昔底德陷阱”。

  (作者为清华大学中美关系研究中心主任、教授、博导)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Topics

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

1 COMMENT